Primary care consultation predictors in men and women: a cohort study
Primary care consultation predictors in men and women: a cohort study
Background: women visit their doctors more than men, but comparatively few studies have explored gender differences in consultation in detail.
Aims: to identify the factors that predicted the number of primary care consultations in men and women over a 5-year period.
Design of study: prospective cohort study with three waves of data collection by postal questionnaire.
Setting: a single suburban general practice in Greater Manchester, UK.
Method: consultation data were sought from primary care records on a random sample of 800 adults. The main outcome measure was the number of consultations over the 5 years of the study. Questionnaire measures included the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire, the Illness Attitude Scales, a somatic symptom scale, a fatigue scale, and a functional assessment of disability.
Results: consultation data were obtained on 738 patients (445 women, 293 men, 92% of selected subjects). Longitudinal models of consultation over 5 years showed that changes in psychological distress were more strongly associated with consultation in women than in men, whereas cognitive factors (negative illness attitudes) were more strongly associated with the consultation rate in men than women.
Conclusion: the predictors of consultation in primary care may be different for men and women. A fuller understanding of the reasons for consultation may enable primary care doctors to better help individual patients, as well as perhaps contributing more generally to the development of gender specific interventions for those who consult unusually frequently.
108-113
Kapur, Navneet
f713a6d9-5625-4492-81fb-75801b6cb12a
Hunt, Isabelle
bcc66767-5860-4e22-9a21-ce72ce35b6b4
Lunt, Mark
c2b3288c-62f9-4a6c-aca5-ad0c1cc76ce5
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Creed, Francis
9df34f9e-5bf4-411f-8eed-b12dbc2d395c
Macfarlane, Gary
dafa2d7d-c3c2-4c41-8fe7-e8d8de0ee3e7
February 2005
Kapur, Navneet
f713a6d9-5625-4492-81fb-75801b6cb12a
Hunt, Isabelle
bcc66767-5860-4e22-9a21-ce72ce35b6b4
Lunt, Mark
c2b3288c-62f9-4a6c-aca5-ad0c1cc76ce5
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Creed, Francis
9df34f9e-5bf4-411f-8eed-b12dbc2d395c
Macfarlane, Gary
dafa2d7d-c3c2-4c41-8fe7-e8d8de0ee3e7
Kapur, Navneet, Hunt, Isabelle, Lunt, Mark, McBeth, John, Creed, Francis and Macfarlane, Gary
(2005)
Primary care consultation predictors in men and women: a cohort study.
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 55, .
Abstract
Background: women visit their doctors more than men, but comparatively few studies have explored gender differences in consultation in detail.
Aims: to identify the factors that predicted the number of primary care consultations in men and women over a 5-year period.
Design of study: prospective cohort study with three waves of data collection by postal questionnaire.
Setting: a single suburban general practice in Greater Manchester, UK.
Method: consultation data were sought from primary care records on a random sample of 800 adults. The main outcome measure was the number of consultations over the 5 years of the study. Questionnaire measures included the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire, the Illness Attitude Scales, a somatic symptom scale, a fatigue scale, and a functional assessment of disability.
Results: consultation data were obtained on 738 patients (445 women, 293 men, 92% of selected subjects). Longitudinal models of consultation over 5 years showed that changes in psychological distress were more strongly associated with consultation in women than in men, whereas cognitive factors (negative illness attitudes) were more strongly associated with the consultation rate in men than women.
Conclusion: the predictors of consultation in primary care may be different for men and women. A fuller understanding of the reasons for consultation may enable primary care doctors to better help individual patients, as well as perhaps contributing more generally to the development of gender specific interventions for those who consult unusually frequently.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Submitted date: 21 October 2003
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 May 2004
Published date: February 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 491512
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491512
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 847d8c5e-a959-40cc-9c9f-a43df2c5a3f7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Jun 2024 16:51
Last modified: 26 Jun 2024 02:11
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Navneet Kapur
Author:
Isabelle Hunt
Author:
Mark Lunt
Author:
John McBeth
Author:
Francis Creed
Author:
Gary Macfarlane
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics