The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Development and validation of classification criteria for idiopathic orofacial pain for use in population-based studies

Development and validation of classification criteria for idiopathic orofacial pain for use in population-based studies
Development and validation of classification criteria for idiopathic orofacial pain for use in population-based studies
Aim: to develop and validate a questionnaire-based tool which would enable classification of idiopathic orofacial pain in the general population.

Methods: a postal questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was made of 4200 randomly selected adults who were registered with a general medical practice in North West England. The questionnaire collected information on a number of factors: demographics (age, gender), orofacial pain (duration, descriptors, site, pattern, intensity, disability, and consultation behavior), and comorbidities (reporting of other unexplained symptoms and psychosocial factors). Subjects reporting orofacial pain were interviewed by an examiner blinded to their exposure status and classified into 1 of 3 categories: (a) dentoalveolar, (b) musculoligamentous/soft tissue, and (c) idiopathic orofacial pain.

Results: a high adjusted response rate of 72% was achieved (crude response rate 60%). Of those who reported orofacial pain and were eligible for interview (n=218), 197 (88%) were interviewed. Subjects classified by interview into the idiopathic category were more likely to report aching, nagging, and chronic pain pain at multiple sites. They were also more likely to report facial trauma and other chronic symptoms and to have consulted multiple health-care workers. Variables that most strongly predicted membership into the idiopathic category were female gender, nagging, aching pain which was worse when stressed, and topography (pain at multiple sites and unilateral pain).

Conclusion: the classification criteria developed for idiopathic orofacial pain can be used as a screening tool for subjects with this condition in the general population.
203-215
Aggarwal, Vishal R.
0ee2f49c-3fae-4d46-8754-09a1f72bb25e
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Lunt, Mark
c2b3288c-62f9-4a6c-aca5-ad0c1cc76ce5
Zakrzewska, Joanna M.
cc61cb10-51fd-4d54-9045-6d088c1e5a7a
Macfarlane, Gary J.
332acabb-a9cf-4434-b375-c8dd3a659e9f
Aggarwal, Vishal R.
0ee2f49c-3fae-4d46-8754-09a1f72bb25e
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Lunt, Mark
c2b3288c-62f9-4a6c-aca5-ad0c1cc76ce5
Zakrzewska, Joanna M.
cc61cb10-51fd-4d54-9045-6d088c1e5a7a
Macfarlane, Gary J.
332acabb-a9cf-4434-b375-c8dd3a659e9f

Aggarwal, Vishal R., McBeth, John, Lunt, Mark, Zakrzewska, Joanna M. and Macfarlane, Gary J. (2007) Development and validation of classification criteria for idiopathic orofacial pain for use in population-based studies. Journal of Orofacial Pain, 21 (3), 203-215.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aim: to develop and validate a questionnaire-based tool which would enable classification of idiopathic orofacial pain in the general population.

Methods: a postal questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was made of 4200 randomly selected adults who were registered with a general medical practice in North West England. The questionnaire collected information on a number of factors: demographics (age, gender), orofacial pain (duration, descriptors, site, pattern, intensity, disability, and consultation behavior), and comorbidities (reporting of other unexplained symptoms and psychosocial factors). Subjects reporting orofacial pain were interviewed by an examiner blinded to their exposure status and classified into 1 of 3 categories: (a) dentoalveolar, (b) musculoligamentous/soft tissue, and (c) idiopathic orofacial pain.

Results: a high adjusted response rate of 72% was achieved (crude response rate 60%). Of those who reported orofacial pain and were eligible for interview (n=218), 197 (88%) were interviewed. Subjects classified by interview into the idiopathic category were more likely to report aching, nagging, and chronic pain pain at multiple sites. They were also more likely to report facial trauma and other chronic symptoms and to have consulted multiple health-care workers. Variables that most strongly predicted membership into the idiopathic category were female gender, nagging, aching pain which was worse when stressed, and topography (pain at multiple sites and unilateral pain).

Conclusion: the classification criteria developed for idiopathic orofacial pain can be used as a screening tool for subjects with this condition in the general population.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491538
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491538
PURE UUID: dfc10422-f5d4-41b3-9035-e248ae54b81d
ORCID for John McBeth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-2183

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jun 2024 17:08
Last modified: 26 Jun 2024 02:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: Vishal R. Aggarwal
Author: John McBeth ORCID iD
Author: Mark Lunt
Author: Joanna M. Zakrzewska
Author: Gary J. Macfarlane

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×