The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

2024 UK General Election manifesto commitments: implications for the economy, environment, and society

2024 UK General Election manifesto commitments: implications for the economy, environment, and society
2024 UK General Election manifesto commitments: implications for the economy, environment, and society
In July 2024, the UK will have a general election and elect a new government. The election campaign is filled with claims and counterclaims about what different parties will do. The promises made in political manifestos are a key part of this claim-making, and the wider electoral processes which aid voters in making their decisions. Manifestos can be an important part of people’s decision making and are one way in which the elected government is then held to account. However, the level of detail varies across manifestos, and the accuracy of costings and other information is hotly contested. This work assesses the pledges made in manifestos using a complex system modelling approach, identifying how different pledges interact to predict how each party’s policies would change the political, economic, environmental, and social landscapes of the UK. The outcomes show that more radical ideas are proposed by the smaller parties. The Greens and Liberal Democrats deliver better environmental, social and public services outcomes. Reform UK are predicted to cut average living standards (despite tax cuts) and perform poorly on the environment and many public services such as the NHS, but likely to reduce crime. The Labour and Conservative parties have policies which mainly are predicted not to deliver to the same magnitude as the Greens, Liberal Democrats and Reform (as indicated above). However, Labour are more aligned in most cases to publicly favourable outcomes than the Conservatives. While no party is a clear ‘winner’ in terms of policies, this work compares outcomes across the different parties and may result in better informed decisions being made at the ballot box.
Research Square
Stafford, Rick
cae120e8-477d-4abb-bbea-5df35e0b04ec
Alexander, Jenny
d1118797-d285-4e86-80b2-4c5361c685e2
Axon, Stephen
c4c023f0-121f-4a4b-af33-03f17ba42e8c
Boakes, Zach
91a932a9-02c6-4546-9db4-657e0d009799
Cantarello, Elena
cd0eaa25-7564-4630-9b12-7e51b2369570
Croker, Abigail
eba03727-d50d-4aa1-9a6e-850a469f7125
Cvitanović, Marin
0a3161cf-918e-4bd5-92c8-ace76578d04a
Dominguez Almela, Vicky
c46c331c-e5ba-4da9-8f58-207a4999e02e
Ginige, Tilak
80ea9b65-f8e0-4969-a3ae-dfed973f43d4
Harris, Natalie
650da346-03ca-46a3-9eed-e88d8e65a5ac
Jones, Ellie-Anne
85872338-31a2-4750-baa5-1c461315efd6
Kountouris, Yiannis
e2ec2027-5e5e-42a8-8325-9603dbcd3441
Lilleker, Darren
0b98e4c5-be8d-4817-898d-1166b6cf3315
Russell, Freya
60d47864-cb0b-4aa7-befd-4c7b825841eb
Sokolnicki, James
8198c2b3-cbf6-40df-a332-a17bc51595fd
Upson, Sarah
b761027c-178f-4710-903d-8e15772c9513
Vincent, Ellie
f4b649aa-f8ac-4065-8e51-819a13b01133
Stafford, Rick
cae120e8-477d-4abb-bbea-5df35e0b04ec
Alexander, Jenny
d1118797-d285-4e86-80b2-4c5361c685e2
Axon, Stephen
c4c023f0-121f-4a4b-af33-03f17ba42e8c
Boakes, Zach
91a932a9-02c6-4546-9db4-657e0d009799
Cantarello, Elena
cd0eaa25-7564-4630-9b12-7e51b2369570
Croker, Abigail
eba03727-d50d-4aa1-9a6e-850a469f7125
Cvitanović, Marin
0a3161cf-918e-4bd5-92c8-ace76578d04a
Dominguez Almela, Vicky
c46c331c-e5ba-4da9-8f58-207a4999e02e
Ginige, Tilak
80ea9b65-f8e0-4969-a3ae-dfed973f43d4
Harris, Natalie
650da346-03ca-46a3-9eed-e88d8e65a5ac
Jones, Ellie-Anne
85872338-31a2-4750-baa5-1c461315efd6
Kountouris, Yiannis
e2ec2027-5e5e-42a8-8325-9603dbcd3441
Lilleker, Darren
0b98e4c5-be8d-4817-898d-1166b6cf3315
Russell, Freya
60d47864-cb0b-4aa7-befd-4c7b825841eb
Sokolnicki, James
8198c2b3-cbf6-40df-a332-a17bc51595fd
Upson, Sarah
b761027c-178f-4710-903d-8e15772c9513
Vincent, Ellie
f4b649aa-f8ac-4065-8e51-819a13b01133

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

In July 2024, the UK will have a general election and elect a new government. The election campaign is filled with claims and counterclaims about what different parties will do. The promises made in political manifestos are a key part of this claim-making, and the wider electoral processes which aid voters in making their decisions. Manifestos can be an important part of people’s decision making and are one way in which the elected government is then held to account. However, the level of detail varies across manifestos, and the accuracy of costings and other information is hotly contested. This work assesses the pledges made in manifestos using a complex system modelling approach, identifying how different pledges interact to predict how each party’s policies would change the political, economic, environmental, and social landscapes of the UK. The outcomes show that more radical ideas are proposed by the smaller parties. The Greens and Liberal Democrats deliver better environmental, social and public services outcomes. Reform UK are predicted to cut average living standards (despite tax cuts) and perform poorly on the environment and many public services such as the NHS, but likely to reduce crime. The Labour and Conservative parties have policies which mainly are predicted not to deliver to the same magnitude as the Greens, Liberal Democrats and Reform (as indicated above). However, Labour are more aligned in most cases to publicly favourable outcomes than the Conservatives. While no party is a clear ‘winner’ in terms of policies, this work compares outcomes across the different parties and may result in better informed decisions being made at the ballot box.

Text
v1_covered_5e14b5cf-18f5-45b2-9c04-4ea1d6bfed60 - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (675kB)

More information

Published date: 23 June 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491658
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491658
PURE UUID: f1935766-b0c9-4598-a50c-cf16b3c85d94
ORCID for Vicky Dominguez Almela: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4877-5967

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2024 09:42
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 02:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rick Stafford
Author: Jenny Alexander
Author: Stephen Axon
Author: Zach Boakes
Author: Elena Cantarello
Author: Abigail Croker
Author: Marin Cvitanović
Author: Tilak Ginige
Author: Natalie Harris
Author: Ellie-Anne Jones
Author: Yiannis Kountouris
Author: Darren Lilleker
Author: Freya Russell
Author: James Sokolnicki
Author: Sarah Upson
Author: Ellie Vincent

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×