The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Realistic evaluation of ESP curriculum implementation

Realistic evaluation of ESP curriculum implementation
Realistic evaluation of ESP curriculum implementation
English for specific purposes ESP is a language learning curriculum that is inherently more complex than general English. In higher educational contexts, ESP in the preparatory year programme targets equipping undergraduates with the needed language skills to pursue their academic studies. The specific carrier content in ESP requires English language teachers to expand their professional profile to include knowledge about the specialist field. This study is concerned with evaluating ESP programme through understanding how the processes of curriculum implementation work to enable language teachers to tackle the challenge of fulfilling the learning goals in ESP.
Current research on the evaluation of ESP programmes commonly measures the effectiveness of a programme in terms of its achieved learning outcomes. In contrast, the present study aims to evaluate an ESP programme in Saudi Arabia using a Realist Evaluation (RE) framework. RE was initially developed by Pawson and Tilley (1997), who argued that measuring the end product of an intervention, in this case, an educational programme, does not help us to understand why a specific programme worked or did not work for specific agents and in specific institutions. RE studies, therefore, investigate the causal mechanisms (M)—in the present study, this includes teachers’ reasoning that operates in this particular context (C) and leads to particular outcomes (O).
The current study, therefore, asks in the first instance how the programme was conceptualised and meant to work by programme leads and designers (initial programme theories) and what kind of resources were designated to trigger generative responses for the desired outcomes. These theories are tested through teachers’ theorisation of their practice within the context and in response to the provided resources. From here, we return to the initial programme theories to refine them with the aim of developing models of practice in the ESP programme. Substantive theories within Csikszentmihalyi’s (1990) flow framework were then sought with a view to future incorporation into other educational contexts.
The findings demonstrate that realist evaluation methodology can accommodate the complexity of ESP curriculum implementation and provide practical implications for improving the implementation process. Theorising the embedded practices helped to uncover hidden causal mechanisms located in participants’ reactions and responses to the resources that resulted from interactions with the structure and the professional community. To develop a conducive work environment for ESP teacher engagement, supportive resources that enhance flow state, such as challenge-skill balance, clear goals, and exercising control, would help ESP teachers to be totally immersed in achieving the intended learning objectives and to execute the required efforts to achieve them. The study suggests that promoting the sources of efficacy (Bandura,1997), such as activate mastery, vicarious experience, and managing affective states, may support pragmatic schemes targeting conducive ESP teaching context.
realist evaluation, English for specific purposes, curriculum implementation
University of Southampton
Turkustani, Alaa Mohammedamin
d74e3487-43b7-4926-99e4-9188ba5950ab
Turkustani, Alaa Mohammedamin
d74e3487-43b7-4926-99e4-9188ba5950ab
Zotzmann, Karin
83cb3ab3-c9cd-43c5-946e-cc48462ac234
Kiely, Richard
fc7e2435-51b5-4bf6-8f4e-924b23457630

Turkustani, Alaa Mohammedamin (2024) Realistic evaluation of ESP curriculum implementation. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 357pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

English for specific purposes ESP is a language learning curriculum that is inherently more complex than general English. In higher educational contexts, ESP in the preparatory year programme targets equipping undergraduates with the needed language skills to pursue their academic studies. The specific carrier content in ESP requires English language teachers to expand their professional profile to include knowledge about the specialist field. This study is concerned with evaluating ESP programme through understanding how the processes of curriculum implementation work to enable language teachers to tackle the challenge of fulfilling the learning goals in ESP.
Current research on the evaluation of ESP programmes commonly measures the effectiveness of a programme in terms of its achieved learning outcomes. In contrast, the present study aims to evaluate an ESP programme in Saudi Arabia using a Realist Evaluation (RE) framework. RE was initially developed by Pawson and Tilley (1997), who argued that measuring the end product of an intervention, in this case, an educational programme, does not help us to understand why a specific programme worked or did not work for specific agents and in specific institutions. RE studies, therefore, investigate the causal mechanisms (M)—in the present study, this includes teachers’ reasoning that operates in this particular context (C) and leads to particular outcomes (O).
The current study, therefore, asks in the first instance how the programme was conceptualised and meant to work by programme leads and designers (initial programme theories) and what kind of resources were designated to trigger generative responses for the desired outcomes. These theories are tested through teachers’ theorisation of their practice within the context and in response to the provided resources. From here, we return to the initial programme theories to refine them with the aim of developing models of practice in the ESP programme. Substantive theories within Csikszentmihalyi’s (1990) flow framework were then sought with a view to future incorporation into other educational contexts.
The findings demonstrate that realist evaluation methodology can accommodate the complexity of ESP curriculum implementation and provide practical implications for improving the implementation process. Theorising the embedded practices helped to uncover hidden causal mechanisms located in participants’ reactions and responses to the resources that resulted from interactions with the structure and the professional community. To develop a conducive work environment for ESP teacher engagement, supportive resources that enhance flow state, such as challenge-skill balance, clear goals, and exercising control, would help ESP teachers to be totally immersed in achieving the intended learning objectives and to execute the required efforts to achieve them. The study suggests that promoting the sources of efficacy (Bandura,1997), such as activate mastery, vicarious experience, and managing affective states, may support pragmatic schemes targeting conducive ESP teaching context.

Text
PhD_Thesis_Alaa_Turkustani_updated_-_Copy - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 January 2025.
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mrs-Alaa-Turkustani
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2024
Keywords: realist evaluation, English for specific purposes, curriculum implementation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491683
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491683
PURE UUID: ef8d6a65-eba7-462d-9b4b-22666691b815

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2024 15:49
Last modified: 11 Jul 2024 04:40

Export record

Contributors

Author: Alaa Mohammedamin Turkustani
Thesis advisor: Karin Zotzmann
Thesis advisor: Richard Kiely

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×