A multimethod study of NHS 111 online
A multimethod study of NHS 111 online
Background: NHS 111 online offers 24-hour access to health assessment and triage.
Objectives: this study examined pathways to care, differential access and use, and workforce impacts of NHS 111 online. This study compared NHS 111 with Healthdirect (Haymarket, Australia) virtual triage.
Design: interviews with 80 staff and stakeholders in English primary, urgent and emergency care, and 41 staff and stakeholders associated with Healthdirect. A survey of 2754 respondents, of whom 1137 (41.3%) had used NHS 111 online and 1617 (58.7%) had not.
Results: NHS 111 online is one of several digital health-care technologies and was not differentiated from the NHS 111 telephone service or well understood. There is a similar lack of awareness of Healthdirect virtual triage. NHS 111 and Healthdirect virtual triage are perceived as creating additional work for health-care staff and inappropriate demand for some health services, especially emergency care. One-third of survey respondents reported that they had not used any NHS 111 service (telephone or online). Older people and those with less educational qualifications are less likely to use NHS 111 online. Respondents who had used NHS 111 online reported more use of other urgent care services and make more cumulative use of services than those who had not used NHS 111 online. Users of NHS 111 online had higher levels of self-reported eHealth literacy. There were differences in reported preferences for using NHS 111 online for different symptom presentations.
Conclusions: greater clarity about what the NHS 111 online service offers would allow better signposting and reduce confusion. Generic NHS 111 services are perceived as creating additional work in the primary, urgent and emergency care system. There are differences in eHealth literacy between users and those who have not used NHS 111 online, and this suggests that ‘digital first’ policies may increase health inequalities
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Maclellan, Jennifer
2035484c-7514-4a4b-9ad4-ef8e3fdc95e9
Churruca, Kate
09a2253c-e702-43c8-9ad0-17bc09d8b6f3
Ellis, Louise A.
f7798bf2-8eb4-4518-b823-260f146c59d0
Prichard, Jane
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
Browne, David
b8580a4d-4309-4230-b9a2-fe86b79464a6
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
1a460cca-92db-459d-ba1b-7d0a25ee6546
Petter, Emily
8997239e-a174-498b-a0de-da9b9cc4cb8a
Chisambi, Matthew
56c6b68a-5399-47e6-880f-92964032a983
Pope, Catherine
1de78791-009f-41f0-8b9f-6d3a9d2ce412
15 June 2023
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Maclellan, Jennifer
2035484c-7514-4a4b-9ad4-ef8e3fdc95e9
Churruca, Kate
09a2253c-e702-43c8-9ad0-17bc09d8b6f3
Ellis, Louise A.
f7798bf2-8eb4-4518-b823-260f146c59d0
Prichard, Jane
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
Browne, David
b8580a4d-4309-4230-b9a2-fe86b79464a6
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
1a460cca-92db-459d-ba1b-7d0a25ee6546
Petter, Emily
8997239e-a174-498b-a0de-da9b9cc4cb8a
Chisambi, Matthew
56c6b68a-5399-47e6-880f-92964032a983
Pope, Catherine
1de78791-009f-41f0-8b9f-6d3a9d2ce412
Turnbull, Joanne, Maclellan, Jennifer, Churruca, Kate, Ellis, Louise A., Prichard, Jane, Browne, David, Braithwaite, Jeffrey, Petter, Emily, Chisambi, Matthew and Pope, Catherine
(2023)
A multimethod study of NHS 111 online.
Health and Social Care Delivery Research, 11 (5).
(doi:10.3310/YTRR9821).
Abstract
Background: NHS 111 online offers 24-hour access to health assessment and triage.
Objectives: this study examined pathways to care, differential access and use, and workforce impacts of NHS 111 online. This study compared NHS 111 with Healthdirect (Haymarket, Australia) virtual triage.
Design: interviews with 80 staff and stakeholders in English primary, urgent and emergency care, and 41 staff and stakeholders associated with Healthdirect. A survey of 2754 respondents, of whom 1137 (41.3%) had used NHS 111 online and 1617 (58.7%) had not.
Results: NHS 111 online is one of several digital health-care technologies and was not differentiated from the NHS 111 telephone service or well understood. There is a similar lack of awareness of Healthdirect virtual triage. NHS 111 and Healthdirect virtual triage are perceived as creating additional work for health-care staff and inappropriate demand for some health services, especially emergency care. One-third of survey respondents reported that they had not used any NHS 111 service (telephone or online). Older people and those with less educational qualifications are less likely to use NHS 111 online. Respondents who had used NHS 111 online reported more use of other urgent care services and make more cumulative use of services than those who had not used NHS 111 online. Users of NHS 111 online had higher levels of self-reported eHealth literacy. There were differences in reported preferences for using NHS 111 online for different symptom presentations.
Conclusions: greater clarity about what the NHS 111 online service offers would allow better signposting and reduce confusion. Generic NHS 111 services are perceived as creating additional work in the primary, urgent and emergency care system. There are differences in eHealth literacy between users and those who have not used NHS 111 online, and this suggests that ‘digital first’ policies may increase health inequalities
Text
3042388
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 15 June 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 492023
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492023
ISSN: 2755-0060
PURE UUID: 8c33d49c-c44f-412c-be41-3f98890cfa64
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jul 2024 17:03
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 01:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jennifer Maclellan
Author:
Kate Churruca
Author:
Louise A. Ellis
Author:
David Browne
Author:
Jeffrey Braithwaite
Author:
Emily Petter
Author:
Matthew Chisambi
Author:
Catherine Pope
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics