Cost-effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a UK perspective
Cost-effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a UK perspective
Background: use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcomes over angiography alone. Despite this, the adoption of IVUS in clinical practice remains low.
Aims: to examine the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI compared to angiography alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Methods and results: a 1-year decision tree and lifetime Markov model were constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI to angiography alone for two hypothetical adult populations consisting of 1000 individuals: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The United Kingdom (UK) healthcare system perspective was applied using 2019/20 costs. All-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat PCI, lifetime costs, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed. Over a lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PCI was cost-effective compared to angiography alone in both populations, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3649 and £5706 per-patient in STEMI and UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively.
In the 1-year time horizon, the model suggested that IVUS was associated with reductions in mortality, MI, and repeat PCI by 51%, 33%, and 52% in STEMI and by 50%, 29%, and 57% in UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the model with IVUS being 100% cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY-gained.
Conclusions: from a UK healthcare perspective, an IVUS-guided PCI strategy was highly cost-effective over angiography alone amongst ACS patients undergoing DES implantation due to the medium- and long-term reduction in repeat PCI, death, and MI.
Sharp, Andrew S.P.
055f6bfa-5dfe-435b-950b-71cf482e734f
Kinnaird, Tim
dffd47bc-275a-4590-a152-bb589fce875e
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Ayyub, Ruba
06ef9422-133c-44af-8fdf-1d00703efa20
Alfonso, Jorge Emilio
f6939e20-f717-46d1-bf68-fa81008ae83c
Mamas, Mamas A.
f242959b-aa00-4234-831e-2d7b4e7a0ead
Bavière, Henri Vanden
9919f09e-3d24-4a3c-b6c4-241eaaa77192
8 January 2024
Sharp, Andrew S.P.
055f6bfa-5dfe-435b-950b-71cf482e734f
Kinnaird, Tim
dffd47bc-275a-4590-a152-bb589fce875e
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Ayyub, Ruba
06ef9422-133c-44af-8fdf-1d00703efa20
Alfonso, Jorge Emilio
f6939e20-f717-46d1-bf68-fa81008ae83c
Mamas, Mamas A.
f242959b-aa00-4234-831e-2d7b4e7a0ead
Bavière, Henri Vanden
9919f09e-3d24-4a3c-b6c4-241eaaa77192
Sharp, Andrew S.P., Kinnaird, Tim, Curzen, Nick, Ayyub, Ruba, Alfonso, Jorge Emilio, Mamas, Mamas A. and Bavière, Henri Vanden
(2024)
Cost-effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a UK perspective.
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, [qcad073].
(doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad073).
Abstract
Background: use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcomes over angiography alone. Despite this, the adoption of IVUS in clinical practice remains low.
Aims: to examine the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI compared to angiography alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Methods and results: a 1-year decision tree and lifetime Markov model were constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI to angiography alone for two hypothetical adult populations consisting of 1000 individuals: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The United Kingdom (UK) healthcare system perspective was applied using 2019/20 costs. All-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat PCI, lifetime costs, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed. Over a lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PCI was cost-effective compared to angiography alone in both populations, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3649 and £5706 per-patient in STEMI and UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively.
In the 1-year time horizon, the model suggested that IVUS was associated with reductions in mortality, MI, and repeat PCI by 51%, 33%, and 52% in STEMI and by 50%, 29%, and 57% in UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the model with IVUS being 100% cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY-gained.
Conclusions: from a UK healthcare perspective, an IVUS-guided PCI strategy was highly cost-effective over angiography alone amongst ACS patients undergoing DES implantation due to the medium- and long-term reduction in repeat PCI, death, and MI.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 December 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 December 2023
Published date: 8 January 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 492024
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492024
ISSN: 2058-5225
PURE UUID: 61f9463a-085b-4047-8aa7-38124f84c064
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jul 2024 17:06
Last modified: 13 Jul 2024 01:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Andrew S.P. Sharp
Author:
Tim Kinnaird
Author:
Ruba Ayyub
Author:
Jorge Emilio Alfonso
Author:
Mamas A. Mamas
Author:
Henri Vanden Bavière
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics