The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The relationship between psychosis and psychological flexibility and other acceptance and commitment therapy processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The relationship between psychosis and psychological flexibility and other acceptance and commitment therapy processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The relationship between psychosis and psychological flexibility and other acceptance and commitment therapy processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: The psychological inflexibility model proposes several transdiagnostic processes maintaining psychological distress and is one of the models forming the basis of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). ACT has been recently used as an intervention for psychosis but prior to the present review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022369048) the relationship between psychological inflexibility and other ACT processes in the context of psychosis or psychosis-like symptoms has not been investigated. Method: A Literature search of PsychINFO, Medline, PsychArticles, Web of Science and Embase was conducted, and methodological quality assessed. 655 titles were screened and were included if they explored the relationship between psychological inflexibility (experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, values clarity, committed action) and psychosis or psychosis-like symptoms in the general population. Results: A total of 32 studies were included in this review. Most studies were cross sectional and rated moderate in their methodological quality. Meta-analyses revealed a large effect of psychological inflexibility on paranoia, medium effect on delusions, small effect on auditory hallucinations. A medium effect of cognitive fusion on paranoia was found and medium effect size when comparing group differences (psychosis vs controls) in psychological flexibility. Additional findings (mostly mediation and moderation effects) not included in the meta-analyses are reported. Discussion: The overall evidence suggests that there is a significant relationship between psychological flexibility and psychotic symptoms, particularly paranoia. This provides evidence supporting the use of acceptance-based interventions in the context of psychosis. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
2212-1447
Pittman, James
b894f9d0-9497-4936-a5e8-bf998061d037
Richardson, Thomas
f8d84122-b061-4322-a594-5ef2eb5cad0d
Palmer-Cooper, Emma
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
Pittman, James
b894f9d0-9497-4936-a5e8-bf998061d037
Richardson, Thomas
f8d84122-b061-4322-a594-5ef2eb5cad0d
Palmer-Cooper, Emma
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086

Pittman, James, Richardson, Thomas and Palmer-Cooper, Emma (2024) The relationship between psychosis and psychological flexibility and other acceptance and commitment therapy processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, [100800]. (doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100800).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Introduction: The psychological inflexibility model proposes several transdiagnostic processes maintaining psychological distress and is one of the models forming the basis of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). ACT has been recently used as an intervention for psychosis but prior to the present review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022369048) the relationship between psychological inflexibility and other ACT processes in the context of psychosis or psychosis-like symptoms has not been investigated. Method: A Literature search of PsychINFO, Medline, PsychArticles, Web of Science and Embase was conducted, and methodological quality assessed. 655 titles were screened and were included if they explored the relationship between psychological inflexibility (experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, values clarity, committed action) and psychosis or psychosis-like symptoms in the general population. Results: A total of 32 studies were included in this review. Most studies were cross sectional and rated moderate in their methodological quality. Meta-analyses revealed a large effect of psychological inflexibility on paranoia, medium effect on delusions, small effect on auditory hallucinations. A medium effect of cognitive fusion on paranoia was found and medium effect size when comparing group differences (psychosis vs controls) in psychological flexibility. Additional findings (mostly mediation and moderation effects) not included in the meta-analyses are reported. Discussion: The overall evidence suggests that there is a significant relationship between psychological flexibility and psychotic symptoms, particularly paranoia. This provides evidence supporting the use of acceptance-based interventions in the context of psychosis. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Text
Pittman_full accepted Manuscript- Meta - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 June 2026.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 June 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 June 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492033
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492033
ISSN: 2212-1447
PURE UUID: 5a1d901f-063b-48bf-bfe9-79f8863b09d1
ORCID for James Pittman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0008-3195-1649
ORCID for Thomas Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-4281
ORCID for Emma Palmer-Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-1518

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jul 2024 16:50
Last modified: 13 Jul 2024 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Pittman ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×