The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A machine learning approach using stone volume to predict stone-free status at ureteroscopy

A machine learning approach using stone volume to predict stone-free status at ureteroscopy
A machine learning approach using stone volume to predict stone-free status at ureteroscopy

Introduction: To develop a predictive model incorporating stone volume along with other clinical and radiological factors to predict stone-free (SF) status at ureteroscopy (URS). Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing URS for kidney stone disease at our institution from 2012 to 2021. SF status was defined as stone fragments < 2 mm at the end of the procedure confirmed endoscopically and no evidence of stone fragments > 2 mm at XR KUB or US KUB at 3 months follow up. We specifically included all non-SF patients to optimise our algorithm for identifying instances with residual stone burden. SF patients were also randomly sampled over the same time period to ensure a more balanced dataset for ML prediction. Stone volumes were measured using preprocedural CT and combined with 19 other clinical and radiological factors. A bagged trees machine learning model with cross-validation was used for this analysis. Results: 330 patients were included (SF: n = 276, not SF: n = 54, mean age 59.5 ± 16.1 years). A fivefold cross validated RUSboosted trees model has an accuracy of 74.5% and AUC of 0.82. The model sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 72.2% respectively. Variable importance analysis identified total stone volume (17.7% of total importance), operation time (14.3%), age (12.9%) and stone composition (10.9%) as important factors in predicting non-SF patients. Single and cumulative stone size which are commonly used in current practice to guide management, only represented 9.4% and 4.7% of total importance, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning can be used to predict patients that will be SF at the time of URS. Total stone volume appears to be more important than stone size in predicting SF status. Our findings could be used to optimise patient counselling and highlight an increasing role of stone volume to guide endourological practice and future guidelines.

AI, Kidney calculi, Machine learning, Stone volume, Ureteroscopy
0724-4983
Vigneswaran, Ganesh
4e3865ad-1a15-4a27-b810-55348e7baceb
Teh, Ren
751dbd30-a534-40d6-a397-6b4b55ac146b
Ripa, Francesco
9630dd73-714a-44cc-81b3-89f2179147e1
Pietropaolo, Amelia
dd6770c4-bf2e-46a9-b7a2-7bd3f9fdba56
Modi, Sachin
caef086a-dda5-418a-ada8-fc042e6e0b18
Chauhan, Jagmohan
831a12dc-6df9-40ea-8bb3-2c5da8882804
Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
7ed77b4e-3ffc-43ef-bc61-bd1c1544518c
Vigneswaran, Ganesh
4e3865ad-1a15-4a27-b810-55348e7baceb
Teh, Ren
751dbd30-a534-40d6-a397-6b4b55ac146b
Ripa, Francesco
9630dd73-714a-44cc-81b3-89f2179147e1
Pietropaolo, Amelia
dd6770c4-bf2e-46a9-b7a2-7bd3f9fdba56
Modi, Sachin
caef086a-dda5-418a-ada8-fc042e6e0b18
Chauhan, Jagmohan
831a12dc-6df9-40ea-8bb3-2c5da8882804
Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
7ed77b4e-3ffc-43ef-bc61-bd1c1544518c

Vigneswaran, Ganesh, Teh, Ren, Ripa, Francesco, Pietropaolo, Amelia, Modi, Sachin, Chauhan, Jagmohan and Somani, Bhaskar Kumar (2024) A machine learning approach using stone volume to predict stone-free status at ureteroscopy. World Journal of Urology, 42 (1), [344]. (doi:10.1007/s00345-024-05054-6).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: To develop a predictive model incorporating stone volume along with other clinical and radiological factors to predict stone-free (SF) status at ureteroscopy (URS). Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing URS for kidney stone disease at our institution from 2012 to 2021. SF status was defined as stone fragments < 2 mm at the end of the procedure confirmed endoscopically and no evidence of stone fragments > 2 mm at XR KUB or US KUB at 3 months follow up. We specifically included all non-SF patients to optimise our algorithm for identifying instances with residual stone burden. SF patients were also randomly sampled over the same time period to ensure a more balanced dataset for ML prediction. Stone volumes were measured using preprocedural CT and combined with 19 other clinical and radiological factors. A bagged trees machine learning model with cross-validation was used for this analysis. Results: 330 patients were included (SF: n = 276, not SF: n = 54, mean age 59.5 ± 16.1 years). A fivefold cross validated RUSboosted trees model has an accuracy of 74.5% and AUC of 0.82. The model sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 72.2% respectively. Variable importance analysis identified total stone volume (17.7% of total importance), operation time (14.3%), age (12.9%) and stone composition (10.9%) as important factors in predicting non-SF patients. Single and cumulative stone size which are commonly used in current practice to guide management, only represented 9.4% and 4.7% of total importance, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning can be used to predict patients that will be SF at the time of URS. Total stone volume appears to be more important than stone size in predicting SF status. Our findings could be used to optimise patient counselling and highlight an increasing role of stone volume to guide endourological practice and future guidelines.

Text
15-01-2024-A_Machine_Learning_Approach_to_Predict_Stone_GVeditdocx (1) - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 22 May 2025.
Available under License Other.
Request a copy
Text
s00345-024-05054-6 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 May 2024
Published date: 22 May 2024
Keywords: AI, Kidney calculi, Machine learning, Stone volume, Ureteroscopy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492118
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492118
ISSN: 0724-4983
PURE UUID: dbdfcc93-699d-44d1-90e1-f137bf3f7581
ORCID for Ganesh Vigneswaran: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4115-428X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jul 2024 16:31
Last modified: 18 Jul 2024 01:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ren Teh
Author: Francesco Ripa
Author: Amelia Pietropaolo
Author: Sachin Modi
Author: Jagmohan Chauhan
Author: Bhaskar Kumar Somani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×