The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Discovery of marageing steels: machine learning vs. physical metallurgical modelling

Discovery of marageing steels: machine learning vs. physical metallurgical modelling
Discovery of marageing steels: machine learning vs. physical metallurgical modelling

Physical metallurgical (PM) and data-driven approaches can be independently applied to alloy design. Steel technology is a field of physical metallurgy around which some of the most comprehensive understanding has been developed, with vast models on the relationship between composition, processing, microstructure and properties. They have been applied to the design of new steel alloys in the pursuit of grades of improved properties. With the advent of rapid computing and low-cost data storage, a wealth of data has become available to a suite of modelling techniques referred to as machine learning (ML). ML is being emergingly applied in materials discovery while it requires data mining with its adoption being limited by insufficient high-quality datasets, often leading to unrealistic materials design predictions outside the boundaries of the intended properties. It is therefore required to appraise the strength and weaknesses of PM and ML approach, to assess the real design power of each towards designing novel steel grades. This work incorporates models and datasets from well-established literature on marageing steels. Combining genetic algorithm (GA) with PM models to optimise the parameters adopted for each dataset to maximise the prediction accuracy of PM models, and the results were compared with ML models. The results indicate that PM approaches provide a clearer picture of the overall composition-microstructure-properties relationship but are highly sensitive to the alloy system and hence lack on exploration ability of new domains. ML conversely provides little explicit physical insight whilst yielding a stronger prediction accuracy for large-scale data. Hybrid PM/ML approaches provide solutions maximising accuracy, while leading to a clearer physical picture and the desired properties.

Machine learning, Marageing steel, Physical metallurgy, Small sample problem
1005-0302
258-268
Shen, Chunguang
30382d2f-8af8-4b18-82a4-cbbfa60fee87
Wang, Chenchong
7a4e43c6-5a3d-4b92-b7ef-ced54e775b1f
Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, Pedro E.J.
6e0abc1c-2aee-4a18-badc-bac28e7831e2
Xu, Dake
ad084bd6-0725-4c0c-babd-76efea918839
Zhang, Qian
64250070-817f-43bd-bd37-105597de48f6
Zhang, Chi
ed1c74f9-93dc-4d1d-88b4-439537af8031
Xu, Wei
d012c621-8510-4ac3-bd83-9da7515b98d2
Shen, Chunguang
30382d2f-8af8-4b18-82a4-cbbfa60fee87
Wang, Chenchong
7a4e43c6-5a3d-4b92-b7ef-ced54e775b1f
Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, Pedro E.J.
6e0abc1c-2aee-4a18-badc-bac28e7831e2
Xu, Dake
ad084bd6-0725-4c0c-babd-76efea918839
Zhang, Qian
64250070-817f-43bd-bd37-105597de48f6
Zhang, Chi
ed1c74f9-93dc-4d1d-88b4-439537af8031
Xu, Wei
d012c621-8510-4ac3-bd83-9da7515b98d2

Shen, Chunguang, Wang, Chenchong, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, Pedro E.J., Xu, Dake, Zhang, Qian, Zhang, Chi and Xu, Wei (2021) Discovery of marageing steels: machine learning vs. physical metallurgical modelling. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 87, 258-268. (doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.017).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Physical metallurgical (PM) and data-driven approaches can be independently applied to alloy design. Steel technology is a field of physical metallurgy around which some of the most comprehensive understanding has been developed, with vast models on the relationship between composition, processing, microstructure and properties. They have been applied to the design of new steel alloys in the pursuit of grades of improved properties. With the advent of rapid computing and low-cost data storage, a wealth of data has become available to a suite of modelling techniques referred to as machine learning (ML). ML is being emergingly applied in materials discovery while it requires data mining with its adoption being limited by insufficient high-quality datasets, often leading to unrealistic materials design predictions outside the boundaries of the intended properties. It is therefore required to appraise the strength and weaknesses of PM and ML approach, to assess the real design power of each towards designing novel steel grades. This work incorporates models and datasets from well-established literature on marageing steels. Combining genetic algorithm (GA) with PM models to optimise the parameters adopted for each dataset to maximise the prediction accuracy of PM models, and the results were compared with ML models. The results indicate that PM approaches provide a clearer picture of the overall composition-microstructure-properties relationship but are highly sensitive to the alloy system and hence lack on exploration ability of new domains. ML conversely provides little explicit physical insight whilst yielding a stronger prediction accuracy for large-scale data. Hybrid PM/ML approaches provide solutions maximising accuracy, while leading to a clearer physical picture and the desired properties.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 February 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 March 2021
Published date: 25 March 2021
Keywords: Machine learning, Marageing steel, Physical metallurgy, Small sample problem

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492234
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492234
ISSN: 1005-0302
PURE UUID: 8fa52dfe-3e81-4b1f-b579-de6a295646f9
ORCID for Pedro E.J. Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-8347

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jul 2024 17:00
Last modified: 23 Jul 2024 02:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chunguang Shen
Author: Chenchong Wang
Author: Pedro E.J. Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo ORCID iD
Author: Dake Xu
Author: Qian Zhang
Author: Chi Zhang
Author: Wei Xu

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×