The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory

Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory
Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory
Background: Translating evidence into practice has been notoriously difficult within the field of infection prevention and control (IPC). Care bundles- a form of complex intervention with multiple interacting components, may reduce neonatal CLABSIs by 60%. However, it may be unclear if it is the bundle, the implementation process, or a combination of both, that results in CLABSI reductions. Therefore, understanding what works, how it works, and in what settings, is important to improve the translation of evidence into practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of a care bundle aimed at reducing CLABSIs in a UK neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: A mixed-methods, focused ethnography design underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) surveys, observations of practice with retrospective, dyadic think aloud interviews, and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate implementation. Routinely collected, anonymised local data on CLABSI rates and bundle adherence rates provided the context for implementation. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: The introduction of a care bundle into a tertiary UK NICU did not result in sustained reductions in CLABSIs, despite apparent increases in bundle adherence. There was only partial bundle implementation, with minimal changes in survey scores and influences across individual, team and organisational levels moderating bundle adoption. Local organisational culture sometimes undermined implementation efforts. Ultimately, there were challenges relating to reinforcement and endorsement of the bundle. Recommendations to improve bundle adoption include improving reinforcement, building in accountability, and improving collective knowledge management.

Conclusions: The introduction of a care bundle into a tertiary UK NICU did not result in sustained reductions in CLABSIs, which is one of few negative studies. Understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not) in specific contexts is important to optimise the delivery of evidence-based care.
Neonatal, Implementation science, Infection prevention and control
1355-1841
Payne, Vicky
e8d0b37f-b13e-4990-871f-c60def347dd8
Johnson, Mark
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
Hunt, Katherine
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Prieto, Jacqui
47dd42cd-35d5-4ece-8fc6-fdb8fe1f01cc
Payne, Vicky
e8d0b37f-b13e-4990-871f-c60def347dd8
Johnson, Mark
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
Hunt, Katherine
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Prieto, Jacqui
47dd42cd-35d5-4ece-8fc6-fdb8fe1f01cc

Payne, Vicky, Johnson, Mark, Hunt, Katherine and Prieto, Jacqui (2024) Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. (doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2024.07.026). (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Translating evidence into practice has been notoriously difficult within the field of infection prevention and control (IPC). Care bundles- a form of complex intervention with multiple interacting components, may reduce neonatal CLABSIs by 60%. However, it may be unclear if it is the bundle, the implementation process, or a combination of both, that results in CLABSI reductions. Therefore, understanding what works, how it works, and in what settings, is important to improve the translation of evidence into practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of a care bundle aimed at reducing CLABSIs in a UK neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: A mixed-methods, focused ethnography design underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) surveys, observations of practice with retrospective, dyadic think aloud interviews, and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate implementation. Routinely collected, anonymised local data on CLABSI rates and bundle adherence rates provided the context for implementation. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: The introduction of a care bundle into a tertiary UK NICU did not result in sustained reductions in CLABSIs, despite apparent increases in bundle adherence. There was only partial bundle implementation, with minimal changes in survey scores and influences across individual, team and organisational levels moderating bundle adoption. Local organisational culture sometimes undermined implementation efforts. Ultimately, there were challenges relating to reinforcement and endorsement of the bundle. Recommendations to improve bundle adoption include improving reinforcement, building in accountability, and improving collective knowledge management.

Conclusions: The introduction of a care bundle into a tertiary UK NICU did not result in sustained reductions in CLABSIs, which is one of few negative studies. Understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not) in specific contexts is important to optimise the delivery of evidence-based care.

Text
Accepted manuscript PURE 23 07 2024 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 17 July 2025.
Request a copy
Text
Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory - Proof
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 July 2024
Keywords: Neonatal, Implementation science, Infection prevention and control

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492243
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492243
ISSN: 1355-1841
PURE UUID: 67f606f6-70ec-48a1-a26c-19c9aeb0eb15
ORCID for Vicky Payne: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-2806
ORCID for Mark Johnson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1829-9912
ORCID for Katherine Hunt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7319
ORCID for Jacqui Prieto: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5524-6775

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jul 2024 16:32
Last modified: 24 Jul 2024 01:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Vicky Payne ORCID iD
Author: Mark Johnson ORCID iD
Author: Katherine Hunt ORCID iD
Author: Jacqui Prieto ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×