The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A response to Ofsted’s work with schools inquiry

A response to Ofsted’s work with schools inquiry
A response to Ofsted’s work with schools inquiry
There is evidence that inspectors with different characteristics reach different
judgements, especially in primary schools for contract type (HMI versus OI) and gender.
• However, not enough research on Ofsted is done. There can be more transparency and
data made available by Ofsted to facilitate more research.
• The argument that inspection reports are useful for school choice needs to be revised.
• There is a tension between two competing functions of an inspectorate: accountability
and school improvement.
• There is a trade-off between consistency in judgements and the stakes: the higher the
stakes, the more problematic unreliable judgements are.
University of Southampton
Bokhove, Christian
7fc17e5b-9a94-48f3-a387-2ccf60d2d5d8
Jerrim, John
7451aa3a-7b0a-4900-ae83-743eadc70781
Sims, Samuel
958f3090-b223-4832-8794-883afc83cca8
Bokhove, Christian
7fc17e5b-9a94-48f3-a387-2ccf60d2d5d8
Jerrim, John
7451aa3a-7b0a-4900-ae83-743eadc70781
Sims, Samuel
958f3090-b223-4832-8794-883afc83cca8

Bokhove, Christian, Jerrim, John and Sims, Samuel (2023) A response to Ofsted’s work with schools inquiry University of Southampton 5pp. (doi:10.5258/SOTON/PP0031b).

Record type: Monograph (Working Paper)

Abstract

There is evidence that inspectors with different characteristics reach different
judgements, especially in primary schools for contract type (HMI versus OI) and gender.
• However, not enough research on Ofsted is done. There can be more transparency and
data made available by Ofsted to facilitate more research.
• The argument that inspection reports are useful for school choice needs to be revised.
• There is a tension between two competing functions of an inspectorate: accountability
and school improvement.
• There is a trade-off between consistency in judgements and the stakes: the higher the
stakes, the more problematic unreliable judgements are.

Text
Ed_Select_Submission_FNL - Version of Record
Download (332kB)

More information

Published date: 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492348
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492348
PURE UUID: 17b73d7c-6ac0-4845-9ecc-41536209405b
ORCID for Christian Bokhove: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4860-8723

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jul 2024 16:58
Last modified: 25 Jul 2024 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: John Jerrim
Author: Samuel Sims

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×