The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction
Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction
Background: Whether revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve event-free survival and left ventricular function in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, as compared with optimal medical therapy (i.e., individually adjusted pharmacologic and device therapy for heart failure) alone, is unknown.
Methods : We randomly assigned patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less, extensive coronary artery disease amenable to PCI, and demonstrable myocardial viability to a strategy of either PCI plus optimal medical therapy (PCI group) or optimal medical therapy alone (optimal-medical-therapy group). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure. Major secondary outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 and 12 months and quality-of-life scores.
Results: A total of 700 patients underwent randomization — 347 were assigned to the PCI group and 353 to the optimal-medical-therapy group. Over a median of 41 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 129 patients (37.2%) in the PCI group and in 134 patients (38.0%) in the optimal-medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.27; P=0.96). The left ventricular ejection fraction was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, −1.6 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.7 to 0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference, 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.7 to 3.4). Quality-of-life scores at 6 and 12 months appeared to favor the PCI group, but the difference had diminished at 24 months
Conclusions:
Among patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction who received optimal medical therapy, revascularization by PCI did not result in a lower incidence of death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Program; REVIVED-BCIS2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920048.)
0028-4793
1351-1360
Perera, D
c865e2d8-c0bf-48fb-b8ee-d551ea0f1ab7
Clayton, T
cad36fc1-839b-4d23-9059-38e0e15f2792
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
REVIVED-BCIS2 Investigators
Perera, D
c865e2d8-c0bf-48fb-b8ee-d551ea0f1ab7
Clayton, T
cad36fc1-839b-4d23-9059-38e0e15f2792
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4

REVIVED-BCIS2 Investigators (2022) Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. New England Journal of Medicine, 387 (15), 1351-1360. (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2206606).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Whether revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve event-free survival and left ventricular function in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, as compared with optimal medical therapy (i.e., individually adjusted pharmacologic and device therapy for heart failure) alone, is unknown.
Methods : We randomly assigned patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less, extensive coronary artery disease amenable to PCI, and demonstrable myocardial viability to a strategy of either PCI plus optimal medical therapy (PCI group) or optimal medical therapy alone (optimal-medical-therapy group). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure. Major secondary outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 and 12 months and quality-of-life scores.
Results: A total of 700 patients underwent randomization — 347 were assigned to the PCI group and 353 to the optimal-medical-therapy group. Over a median of 41 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 129 patients (37.2%) in the PCI group and in 134 patients (38.0%) in the optimal-medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.27; P=0.96). The left ventricular ejection fraction was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, −1.6 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.7 to 0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference, 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.7 to 3.4). Quality-of-life scores at 6 and 12 months appeared to favor the PCI group, but the difference had diminished at 24 months
Conclusions:
Among patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction who received optimal medical therapy, revascularization by PCI did not result in a lower incidence of death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Program; REVIVED-BCIS2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920048.)

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 27 August 2022
Published date: 13 October 2022
Additional Information: Perera D, Clayton T, O'Kane PD, Greenwood JP, Weerackody R, Ryan M, Morgan HP, Dodd M, Evans R, Canter R, Arnold S, Dixon LJ, Edwards RJ, De Silva K, Spratt JC, Conway D, Cotton J, McEntegart M, Chiribiri A, Saramago P, Gershlick A, Shah AM, Clark AL, Petrie MC; REVIVED-BCIS2 Investigators. Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1351-1360. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206606. Epub 2022 Aug 27. PMID: 36027563

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492425
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492425
ISSN: 0028-4793
PURE UUID: d1a65a08-6237-4d70-85fa-e7ceac9473ca
ORCID for Nick Curzen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2024 16:37
Last modified: 27 Jul 2024 01:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D Perera
Author: T Clayton
Author: Nick Curzen ORCID iD
Corporate Author: REVIVED-BCIS2 Investigators

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×