The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Interpretation of natural tibio-femoral kinematics critically depends upon the kinematic analysis approach: A survey and comparison of methodologies

Interpretation of natural tibio-femoral kinematics critically depends upon the kinematic analysis approach: A survey and comparison of methodologies
Interpretation of natural tibio-femoral kinematics critically depends upon the kinematic analysis approach: A survey and comparison of methodologies
While there is general agreement on the transverse plane knee joint motion for loaded flexion activities, its kinematics during functional movements such as level walking are discussed more controversially. One possible cause of this controversy could originate from the interpretation of kinematics based on different analysis approaches. In order to understand the impact of these approaches on the interpretation of tibio-femoral motion, a set of dynamic videofluoroscopy data presenting continuous knee bending and complete cycles of walking in ten subjects was analysed using six different kinematic analysis approaches. Use of a functional flexion axis resulted in significantly smaller ranges of condylar translation compared to anatomical axes and contact approaches. All contact points were located significantly more anteriorly than the femur fixed axes after 70° of flexion, but also during the early/mid stance and late swing phases of walking. Overall, a central to medial transverse plane centre of rotation was found for both activities using all six kinematic analysis approaches, although individual subjects exhibited lateral centres of rotation using certain approaches. The results of this study clearly show that deviations from the true functional axis of rotation result in kinematic crosstalk, suggesting that functional axes should be reported in preference to anatomical axes. Contact approaches, on the other hand, can present additional information on the local tibio-femoral contact conditions. To allow a more standardised comparison and interpretation of tibio-femoral kinematics, results should therefore be reported using at least a functionally determined axis and possibly also a contact point approach.
0021-9290
Postolka, Barbara
b230433d-44da-4ebb-b632-bd91b8f1a8bd
Taylor, William R.
1ed48ef6-e396-40f5-8434-6c0628c9d3ca
Dätwyler, Katrin
848a168a-5153-415f-9eeb-4acc3c31221a
Heller, Markus
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829
Postolka, Barbara
b230433d-44da-4ebb-b632-bd91b8f1a8bd
Taylor, William R.
1ed48ef6-e396-40f5-8434-6c0628c9d3ca
Dätwyler, Katrin
848a168a-5153-415f-9eeb-4acc3c31221a
Heller, Markus
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829

Postolka, Barbara, Taylor, William R., Dätwyler, Katrin and Heller, Markus (2022) Interpretation of natural tibio-femoral kinematics critically depends upon the kinematic analysis approach: A survey and comparison of methodologies. Journal of Biomechanics, 144 (11), [111306]. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111306).

Record type: Article

Abstract

While there is general agreement on the transverse plane knee joint motion for loaded flexion activities, its kinematics during functional movements such as level walking are discussed more controversially. One possible cause of this controversy could originate from the interpretation of kinematics based on different analysis approaches. In order to understand the impact of these approaches on the interpretation of tibio-femoral motion, a set of dynamic videofluoroscopy data presenting continuous knee bending and complete cycles of walking in ten subjects was analysed using six different kinematic analysis approaches. Use of a functional flexion axis resulted in significantly smaller ranges of condylar translation compared to anatomical axes and contact approaches. All contact points were located significantly more anteriorly than the femur fixed axes after 70° of flexion, but also during the early/mid stance and late swing phases of walking. Overall, a central to medial transverse plane centre of rotation was found for both activities using all six kinematic analysis approaches, although individual subjects exhibited lateral centres of rotation using certain approaches. The results of this study clearly show that deviations from the true functional axis of rotation result in kinematic crosstalk, suggesting that functional axes should be reported in preference to anatomical axes. Contact approaches, on the other hand, can present additional information on the local tibio-femoral contact conditions. To allow a more standardised comparison and interpretation of tibio-femoral kinematics, results should therefore be reported using at least a functionally determined axis and possibly also a contact point approach.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 17 September 2022
Published date: 1 November 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492443
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492443
ISSN: 0021-9290
PURE UUID: cd9a1e55-8b50-4e06-ad00-bf0a85f4a60f
ORCID for Markus Heller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-1135

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2024 16:57
Last modified: 27 Jul 2024 01:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Barbara Postolka
Author: William R. Taylor
Author: Katrin Dätwyler
Author: Markus Heller ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×