Service provision for Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED): a survey of operational characteristics
Service provision for Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED): a survey of operational characteristics
Background: the observational Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED) study found 40% of older people attending for care to be living with frailty. Older people with frailty have poorer outcomes from emergency care. Current best practice calls for early identification of frailty and holistic multidisciplinary assessment. This survey of FEED sites explores variations in frailty-attuned service definitions and provision.
Methods: this cross-sectional survey included study sites across Europe identified through snowball recruitment. Site co-ordinators (healthcare professionals in emergency and geriatric care) were surveyed online using Microsoft Forms. Items covered department and hospital capacity, frailty and delirium identification methods, staffing, and frailty-focused healthcare services in the ED. Descriptive statistics were reported.
Results: a total of 68 sites from 17 countries participated. Emergency departments had median 30 (IQR 21–53) trolley spaces. Most defined "older people" by age 65+ (64%) or 75+ (25%). Frailty screening was used at 69% of sites and mandated at 38%. Night-time staffing was lower compared to day-time for nursing (10 [IQR 8–14] vs. 14 [IQR 10–18]) and physicians (5 [IQR 3–8] vs. 10 [IQR 7–15]). Most sites had provision for ED frailty specialist services by day, but these services were rarely available at night. Sites mostly had accessible facilities; however, hot meals were rarely available at night (18%).
Conclusion: this survey demonstrated variability in case definitions, screening practices, and frailty-attuned service provision. There is no unanimous definition for older age, and while the Clinical Frailty Scale was commonly used, this was rarely mandated or captured in electronic records. Frailty services were often unavailable overnight. Appreciation of the variation in frailty service models could inform operational configuration and workforce development.
Delirium, Emergency care, Frailty, Health services
64
Fehlmann, Christophe
e11821d4-af7a-48ae-bbb4-9917fd784830
Mcloughlin, Kara
e95a6d50-a465-4f39-b120-fb0538512525
Cosgriff, Emma Jane
a1b60614-27d8-4cb2-b618-7f5c1875497d
Ferrick, John Francis
a60bca88-1bda-4614-97f5-db65c4c8b1df
Lim, Stephen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
van Oppen, James
918c74eb-3330-466c-86df-577c920ecbda
European Taskforce for Geriatric Emergency Medicine
29 July 2024
Fehlmann, Christophe
e11821d4-af7a-48ae-bbb4-9917fd784830
Mcloughlin, Kara
e95a6d50-a465-4f39-b120-fb0538512525
Cosgriff, Emma Jane
a1b60614-27d8-4cb2-b618-7f5c1875497d
Ferrick, John Francis
a60bca88-1bda-4614-97f5-db65c4c8b1df
Lim, Stephen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
van Oppen, James
918c74eb-3330-466c-86df-577c920ecbda
European Taskforce for Geriatric Emergency Medicine
(2024)
Service provision for Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED): a survey of operational characteristics.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 32 (1), , [64].
(doi:10.1186/s13049-024-01234-w).
Abstract
Background: the observational Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED) study found 40% of older people attending for care to be living with frailty. Older people with frailty have poorer outcomes from emergency care. Current best practice calls for early identification of frailty and holistic multidisciplinary assessment. This survey of FEED sites explores variations in frailty-attuned service definitions and provision.
Methods: this cross-sectional survey included study sites across Europe identified through snowball recruitment. Site co-ordinators (healthcare professionals in emergency and geriatric care) were surveyed online using Microsoft Forms. Items covered department and hospital capacity, frailty and delirium identification methods, staffing, and frailty-focused healthcare services in the ED. Descriptive statistics were reported.
Results: a total of 68 sites from 17 countries participated. Emergency departments had median 30 (IQR 21–53) trolley spaces. Most defined "older people" by age 65+ (64%) or 75+ (25%). Frailty screening was used at 69% of sites and mandated at 38%. Night-time staffing was lower compared to day-time for nursing (10 [IQR 8–14] vs. 14 [IQR 10–18]) and physicians (5 [IQR 3–8] vs. 10 [IQR 7–15]). Most sites had provision for ED frailty specialist services by day, but these services were rarely available at night. Sites mostly had accessible facilities; however, hot meals were rarely available at night (18%).
Conclusion: this survey demonstrated variability in case definitions, screening practices, and frailty-attuned service provision. There is no unanimous definition for older age, and while the Clinical Frailty Scale was commonly used, this was rarely mandated or captured in electronic records. Frailty services were often unavailable overnight. Appreciation of the variation in frailty service models could inform operational configuration and workforce development.
Text
s13049-024-01234-w
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 July 2024
Published date: 29 July 2024
Keywords:
Delirium, Emergency care, Frailty, Health services
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 492486
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492486
ISSN: 1757-7241
PURE UUID: fa7155b4-ead5-41a5-8cb7-d9c1ae05b67e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Jul 2024 16:31
Last modified: 17 Sep 2024 01:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Christophe Fehlmann
Author:
Kara Mcloughlin
Author:
Emma Jane Cosgriff
Author:
John Francis Ferrick
Author:
James van Oppen
Corporate Author: European Taskforce for Geriatric Emergency Medicine
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics