The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Designing a primary care pharmacist-led review for people treated with opioids for persistent pain: a multi-method qualitative study

Designing a primary care pharmacist-led review for people treated with opioids for persistent pain: a multi-method qualitative study
Designing a primary care pharmacist-led review for people treated with opioids for persistent pain: a multi-method qualitative study
Background: opioids are frequently prescribed for persistent non-cancer pain despite limited evidence of long-term effectiveness and risk of harm. Evidence-based interventions to address inappropriate
opioid prescribing are lacking.

Aim: to explore perspectives of people living with persistent pain to understand barriers and facilitators in reducing opioids in the context of a pharmacist-ledprimary care review, and identify review components and features for optimal delivery.

Design & setting: a multi-method qualitative study undertaken in the primary care setting in the UK.

Method: adults with experience of persistent pain and taking opioids participated in semi-structured

interviews (n = 15, 73% female) and an online discussion forum (n = 31). The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) provided a framework for data collection and thematic analysis, involving deductive analysis to TDF domains, inductive analysis within domains to generate sub-themes, and sub-theme comparison to form across-domain overarching themes. The behaviour change technique taxonomy (v1) and motivational behaviour change technique classification system were used to systematically map themes to behaviour change techniques to identify potential review components and delivery features.

Results: thirty-two facilitator and barrier sub-themes for patients reducing opioids were identified across 13 TDF domains. These combined into the following six overarching themes: learning to live with pain; opioid reduction expectations; assuming a medical model; pharmacist-delivered reviews; pharmacist–patient relationship; and patient engagement. Sub-themes mapped to 21 unique behaviour change techniques, yielding 17 components and five delivery features for the proposed PROMPPT review.

Conclusion: this study generated theoretically informed evidence for design of a practice pharmacist-led PROMPPT review. Future research will test the feasibility and acceptability of the PROMPPT review and pharmacist training.
2398-3795
Woodcock, Charlotte
3b03f8b9-cfe9-48d7-88e7-dc0658de5568
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Cornwall, Nicola
093db397-e7d3-4cb3-9f23-1641e2bde18b
Harrison, Sarah
b0e86f3b-574c-4b57-a68b-da4550a72db6
White, Simon
f9915f9f-3f4f-423c-ad6d-31b393c73fda
Helliwell, Toby
718369b9-65b4-4fe8-bb38-42e45262e2fb
Knaggs, Roger
728412dd-890c-423d-9173-9d7fda9a1337
Hodgson, Eleanor
1a85c2ad-eb09-457c-821a-f6578b6113ea
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Mallen, Christian D.
b6745975-69e1-42b6-b617-37f393237024
Ashworth, Julie
2787d391-bc2b-4b00-a5bf-18e3f5bc133a
Jinks, Clare
26785dc0-7282-4165-8ce0-42a5a135df78
Woodcock, Charlotte
3b03f8b9-cfe9-48d7-88e7-dc0658de5568
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Cornwall, Nicola
093db397-e7d3-4cb3-9f23-1641e2bde18b
Harrison, Sarah
b0e86f3b-574c-4b57-a68b-da4550a72db6
White, Simon
f9915f9f-3f4f-423c-ad6d-31b393c73fda
Helliwell, Toby
718369b9-65b4-4fe8-bb38-42e45262e2fb
Knaggs, Roger
728412dd-890c-423d-9173-9d7fda9a1337
Hodgson, Eleanor
1a85c2ad-eb09-457c-821a-f6578b6113ea
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Mallen, Christian D.
b6745975-69e1-42b6-b617-37f393237024
Ashworth, Julie
2787d391-bc2b-4b00-a5bf-18e3f5bc133a
Jinks, Clare
26785dc0-7282-4165-8ce0-42a5a135df78

Woodcock, Charlotte, Pincus, Tamar, Cornwall, Nicola, Harrison, Sarah, White, Simon, Helliwell, Toby, Knaggs, Roger, Hodgson, Eleanor, Santer, Miriam, Mallen, Christian D., Ashworth, Julie and Jinks, Clare (2024) Designing a primary care pharmacist-led review for people treated with opioids for persistent pain: a multi-method qualitative study. BJGP Open. (doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0221).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: opioids are frequently prescribed for persistent non-cancer pain despite limited evidence of long-term effectiveness and risk of harm. Evidence-based interventions to address inappropriate
opioid prescribing are lacking.

Aim: to explore perspectives of people living with persistent pain to understand barriers and facilitators in reducing opioids in the context of a pharmacist-ledprimary care review, and identify review components and features for optimal delivery.

Design & setting: a multi-method qualitative study undertaken in the primary care setting in the UK.

Method: adults with experience of persistent pain and taking opioids participated in semi-structured

interviews (n = 15, 73% female) and an online discussion forum (n = 31). The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) provided a framework for data collection and thematic analysis, involving deductive analysis to TDF domains, inductive analysis within domains to generate sub-themes, and sub-theme comparison to form across-domain overarching themes. The behaviour change technique taxonomy (v1) and motivational behaviour change technique classification system were used to systematically map themes to behaviour change techniques to identify potential review components and delivery features.

Results: thirty-two facilitator and barrier sub-themes for patients reducing opioids were identified across 13 TDF domains. These combined into the following six overarching themes: learning to live with pain; opioid reduction expectations; assuming a medical model; pharmacist-delivered reviews; pharmacist–patient relationship; and patient engagement. Sub-themes mapped to 21 unique behaviour change techniques, yielding 17 components and five delivery features for the proposed PROMPPT review.

Conclusion: this study generated theoretically informed evidence for design of a practice pharmacist-led PROMPPT review. Future research will test the feasibility and acceptability of the PROMPPT review and pharmacist training.

Text
BJGPO.2023.0221.full - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (527kB)
Text
BJGPO-2023-0221.R1 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (685kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 March 2024
Published date: 7 August 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492487
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492487
ISSN: 2398-3795
PURE UUID: 09b55e01-6141-48cd-9dec-60dcb34f8f4f
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624
ORCID for Miriam Santer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-5260

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jul 2024 16:31
Last modified: 08 Aug 2024 02:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Charlotte Woodcock
Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: Nicola Cornwall
Author: Sarah Harrison
Author: Simon White
Author: Toby Helliwell
Author: Roger Knaggs
Author: Eleanor Hodgson
Author: Miriam Santer ORCID iD
Author: Christian D. Mallen
Author: Julie Ashworth
Author: Clare Jinks

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×