EDI in academic–policy engagement: lived experience of university based knowledge brokers and marginalised academics
EDI in academic–policy engagement: lived experience of university based knowledge brokers and marginalised academics
Background:
Discourse surrounding Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) has received significant attention within the UK academy and knowledge brokerage contexts, and more recently within academic–policy engagement spaces (Walker et al, 2019a; Fawcett, 2021; GOV.UK, 2021; Morris et al, 2021). Key players in this space identify the need for diversifying academic participation, as well as diversifying knowledges (GOV.UK, 2021; UK Parliament, 2018; UKRI, 2023). However, conceptual and practical insight on embedding EDI principles (and what they mean in this context) within academic–policy engagement processes is missing.
Aims and objectives:
Underpinned by feminist and decolonial epistemological concepts, this article addresses this gap by outlining strategies, and surfacing ways in which EDI within academic–policy engagement is experienced, conceptualised, understood and considered.
Methods:
Two parallel qualitative studies, with a total of 20 semi-structured narrative and realist interviews conducted with marginalised researchers (n=10, Study A) and university based knowledge brokers (n=10, Study B), and a rapid literature review. The analysis used a narrative and thematic framework.
Findings and discussion:
We found a want for EDI to go beyond just diversity of people and representation, towards fostering foundational principles of epistemic justice, equitable access, value-driven engagement and plurality. Academics and knowledge brokers reported both negative and positive experiences within this space that related to known EDI issues. We conclude that EDI cannot be standardised across higher education contexts, and emphasise the need for holistic, relational and plural approaches to EDI across academic–policy engagement systems through a value-led, equitable and ethical lens.
1-25
Bea, Laura
cd6760cc-7f9c-4ceb-8f1b-ac07180b8623
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
22 July 2024
Bea, Laura
cd6760cc-7f9c-4ceb-8f1b-ac07180b8623
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
Bea, Laura and Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
(2024)
EDI in academic–policy engagement: lived experience of university based knowledge brokers and marginalised academics.
Evidence and Policy, .
(doi:10.1332/17442648Y2024D000000030).
Abstract
Background:
Discourse surrounding Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) has received significant attention within the UK academy and knowledge brokerage contexts, and more recently within academic–policy engagement spaces (Walker et al, 2019a; Fawcett, 2021; GOV.UK, 2021; Morris et al, 2021). Key players in this space identify the need for diversifying academic participation, as well as diversifying knowledges (GOV.UK, 2021; UK Parliament, 2018; UKRI, 2023). However, conceptual and practical insight on embedding EDI principles (and what they mean in this context) within academic–policy engagement processes is missing.
Aims and objectives:
Underpinned by feminist and decolonial epistemological concepts, this article addresses this gap by outlining strategies, and surfacing ways in which EDI within academic–policy engagement is experienced, conceptualised, understood and considered.
Methods:
Two parallel qualitative studies, with a total of 20 semi-structured narrative and realist interviews conducted with marginalised researchers (n=10, Study A) and university based knowledge brokers (n=10, Study B), and a rapid literature review. The analysis used a narrative and thematic framework.
Findings and discussion:
We found a want for EDI to go beyond just diversity of people and representation, towards fostering foundational principles of epistemic justice, equitable access, value-driven engagement and plurality. Academics and knowledge brokers reported both negative and positive experiences within this space that related to known EDI issues. We conclude that EDI cannot be standardised across higher education contexts, and emphasise the need for holistic, relational and plural approaches to EDI across academic–policy engagement systems through a value-led, equitable and ethical lens.
Text
1406 EDI Strategies Paper E&P v.3 (2)
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 June 2024
Published date: 22 July 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 492604
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492604
ISSN: 1744-2648
PURE UUID: 70128c6c-b14b-4a41-8440-9bb09d9854da
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Aug 2024 16:45
Last modified: 08 Aug 2024 02:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Laura Bea
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics