The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What keeps a vibrant population together?

What keeps a vibrant population together?
What keeps a vibrant population together?
Managing diversity is a challenging problem for organizations and governments. Diversity in a population may be of two kinds—acquired and innate. The former refers to diversity acquired by pre-existing social or organizational environments, attracting employees or immigrants because of their wealth and opportunities. Innate diversity, on the other hand, refers to a collection of pre-existing communities having to interact with one another and to build an overarching social or organizational identity. While acquired diversity has a prior element of common identity, innate diversity needs to build a common identity from a number of disparate regional or local identities. Diversity in any large population may have different extents of acquired and innate elements. In this paper, innate and acquired diversity are modeled in terms of two factors, namely: insularity and homophily, respectively. Insularity is the tendency of agents to act cooperatively only with others from the same community, which is often the primary challenge of innate diversity; while homophily is the tendency of agents to prefer members from their own community to start new social or business connections, which is often the primary challenge in acquired diversity. The emergence of network structure is studied when insularity and homophily are varied. In order to promote cooperation in a diverse population, the role played by a subset of agents called “global” agents who are not affected by homophily and insularity considerations is also studied. Simulation results show several interesting emergent properties. While the global agents are shown to acquire high betweenness, they are by no means the wealthiest or the most powerful in the network. However, the presence of global agents is important for the regional agents whose own wealth prospects increase because of their interaction with global agents.
0891-2513
347-373
Deshmukh, Jayati
5903b0c1-b4d1-4fbf-b687-610d4fde3990
Srinivasa, Srinath
b4e35d32-beae-4c6e-a4f8-3ee56e75d648
Mandyam, Sridhar
d123f8d7-25e9-47db-82ee-111d624036e4
Deshmukh, Jayati
5903b0c1-b4d1-4fbf-b687-610d4fde3990
Srinivasa, Srinath
b4e35d32-beae-4c6e-a4f8-3ee56e75d648
Mandyam, Sridhar
d123f8d7-25e9-47db-82ee-111d624036e4

Deshmukh, Jayati, Srinivasa, Srinath and Mandyam, Sridhar (2021) What keeps a vibrant population together? Complex Systems, 30 (3), 347-373. (doi:10.25088/ComplexSystems.30.3.347).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Managing diversity is a challenging problem for organizations and governments. Diversity in a population may be of two kinds—acquired and innate. The former refers to diversity acquired by pre-existing social or organizational environments, attracting employees or immigrants because of their wealth and opportunities. Innate diversity, on the other hand, refers to a collection of pre-existing communities having to interact with one another and to build an overarching social or organizational identity. While acquired diversity has a prior element of common identity, innate diversity needs to build a common identity from a number of disparate regional or local identities. Diversity in any large population may have different extents of acquired and innate elements. In this paper, innate and acquired diversity are modeled in terms of two factors, namely: insularity and homophily, respectively. Insularity is the tendency of agents to act cooperatively only with others from the same community, which is often the primary challenge of innate diversity; while homophily is the tendency of agents to prefer members from their own community to start new social or business connections, which is often the primary challenge in acquired diversity. The emergence of network structure is studied when insularity and homophily are varied. In order to promote cooperation in a diverse population, the role played by a subset of agents called “global” agents who are not affected by homophily and insularity considerations is also studied. Simulation results show several interesting emergent properties. While the global agents are shown to acquire high betweenness, they are by no means the wealthiest or the most powerful in the network. However, the presence of global agents is important for the regional agents whose own wealth prospects increase because of their interaction with global agents.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 September 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492676
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492676
ISSN: 0891-2513
PURE UUID: 4189758d-d566-4cfe-a1f5-04dbac8bfaa4
ORCID for Jayati Deshmukh: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1144-2635

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Aug 2024 16:32
Last modified: 13 Aug 2024 02:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jayati Deshmukh ORCID iD
Author: Srinath Srinivasa
Author: Sridhar Mandyam

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×