The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The efficacy of custom‑made offloading devices for diabetic foot ulcer prevention: a systematic review

The efficacy of custom‑made offloading devices for diabetic foot ulcer prevention: a systematic review
The efficacy of custom‑made offloading devices for diabetic foot ulcer prevention: a systematic review
Introduction: therapeutic offloading devices, including insoles, shoes, and other orthoses, are some of the most commonly used interventions to treat or prevent diabetic foot ulceration. Custom-made offloading devices are increasingly used to offset the development of foot ulcers. However, whether these devices are more effective than prefabricated standard offloading devices is uncertain. Therefore, this systematic review collates and examines evidence on the efficacy of custom-made offloading devices in preventing foot ulcer incidence and recurrence in people diagnosed with diabetes.

Methods: five scientific databases were searched, covering 2011–2023. Initial searches and screening were carried out independently by two researchers. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were further examined through additional screenings, and critical appraisal. Data relevant to the review aims were extracted and analysed within a narrative synthesis.

Results: of the 1,715 articles found in the initial searches, nine papers were found to meet inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The evidence shows that custom-made offloading devices are likely to be more effective for reducing or preventing diabetic foot ulcers than standard offloading devices. However, due to a lack of data it remains uncertain whether custom-made offloading devices are more cost-effective for preventing ulceration compared to standard insoles. Likewise, due to measurement heterogeneity between studies and lack of data, it is unclear whether adherence is higher in users of custom-made offloading devices, and whether such devices deliver significantly greater reductions in peak pressure as compared to standard offloading devices.

Conclusion: custom-made offloading devices are more effective than standard devices for preventing diabetic foot ulceration, and we recommended their use when feasible; however, there remains uncertainty regarding their cost-effectiveness compared to standard insoles and offloading devices.
1758-5996
Jones, Aled Wyn
98eb5933-577d-463c-b52d-a4033a6f7ab7
Makanjuola, Abraham
3a363e3e-d5a0-431f-9cea-c5dea08c5f4c
Bray, Nathan
6fa8b7c5-7a29-477b-9916-1f225fde1ac3
Prior, Yeliz
b975bd46-8ff2-402a-a4a1-d7c894da8d63
Parker, Daniel
6d527381-ba16-4232-aa16-a4e876f112b0
Nester, Christopher
33a8ddce-a05d-4bb3-a4fc-c30538afeaef
Tang, Jinghua
b4b9a22c-fd6d-427a-9ab1-51184c1d2a2c
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1
Jones, Aled Wyn
98eb5933-577d-463c-b52d-a4033a6f7ab7
Makanjuola, Abraham
3a363e3e-d5a0-431f-9cea-c5dea08c5f4c
Bray, Nathan
6fa8b7c5-7a29-477b-9916-1f225fde1ac3
Prior, Yeliz
b975bd46-8ff2-402a-a4a1-d7c894da8d63
Parker, Daniel
6d527381-ba16-4232-aa16-a4e876f112b0
Nester, Christopher
33a8ddce-a05d-4bb3-a4fc-c30538afeaef
Tang, Jinghua
b4b9a22c-fd6d-427a-9ab1-51184c1d2a2c
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1

Jones, Aled Wyn, Makanjuola, Abraham, Bray, Nathan, Prior, Yeliz, Parker, Daniel, Nester, Christopher, Tang, Jinghua and Jiang, Liudi (2024) The efficacy of custom‑made offloading devices for diabetic foot ulcer prevention: a systematic review. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 16, [172]. (doi:10.1186/s13098-024-01392-y).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Introduction: therapeutic offloading devices, including insoles, shoes, and other orthoses, are some of the most commonly used interventions to treat or prevent diabetic foot ulceration. Custom-made offloading devices are increasingly used to offset the development of foot ulcers. However, whether these devices are more effective than prefabricated standard offloading devices is uncertain. Therefore, this systematic review collates and examines evidence on the efficacy of custom-made offloading devices in preventing foot ulcer incidence and recurrence in people diagnosed with diabetes.

Methods: five scientific databases were searched, covering 2011–2023. Initial searches and screening were carried out independently by two researchers. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were further examined through additional screenings, and critical appraisal. Data relevant to the review aims were extracted and analysed within a narrative synthesis.

Results: of the 1,715 articles found in the initial searches, nine papers were found to meet inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The evidence shows that custom-made offloading devices are likely to be more effective for reducing or preventing diabetic foot ulcers than standard offloading devices. However, due to a lack of data it remains uncertain whether custom-made offloading devices are more cost-effective for preventing ulceration compared to standard insoles. Likewise, due to measurement heterogeneity between studies and lack of data, it is unclear whether adherence is higher in users of custom-made offloading devices, and whether such devices deliver significantly greater reductions in peak pressure as compared to standard offloading devices.

Conclusion: custom-made offloading devices are more effective than standard devices for preventing diabetic foot ulceration, and we recommended their use when feasible; however, there remains uncertainty regarding their cost-effectiveness compared to standard insoles and offloading devices.

Text
published version - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 June 2024
Published date: 24 July 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492755
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492755
ISSN: 1758-5996
PURE UUID: 60824b46-6ed2-4a14-ae81-f76e2b240ad8
ORCID for Jinghua Tang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-5891
ORCID for Liudi Jiang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-825X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Aug 2024 16:55
Last modified: 14 Aug 2024 01:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Aled Wyn Jones
Author: Abraham Makanjuola
Author: Nathan Bray
Author: Yeliz Prior
Author: Daniel Parker
Author: Christopher Nester
Author: Jinghua Tang ORCID iD
Author: Liudi Jiang ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×