The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Peer reviews for academic skills. Supporting engineering students on their writing journey

Peer reviews for academic skills. Supporting engineering students on their writing journey
Peer reviews for academic skills. Supporting engineering students on their writing journey
Peer reviews are an effective pedagogic approach for enhancing writing skills in higher education. Their benefits include improved engagement with feedback, increased use of higher-level cognitive skills, and enhanced engagement with independent learning. This study outlines an intervention aimed at introducing peer review sessions within an Engineering Foundation Year cohort. The rationale for introducing peer reviews into an academic skills module on this programme included the benefits outlined above as well as improving students’ reflective skills, fostering collegiality, and improving attendance at workshop sessions. Prior to peer review being introduced, a pre-intervention evaluation was carried out. This identified specific issues within the module which the secondary literature suggested could be mitigated by peer review techniques. A bespoke peer review model for the module was developed by the University’s Enhancement Team (academic skills staff). Module teaching staff (including PGRs) were then trained in appropriate peer review concepts and practices. Formative training for students focused on key elements of peer review, including clear written communication, referencing conventions, and structural issues. The research and writing assignment within the Routes to Success module incorporated the peer review sessions as an integral part of its design, and the quality of the reviews was assessed as part of students' overall performance grade. This study aims to investigate the impact of the intervention on students' writing abilities as well as their engagement with feedback and attendance, contributing to the broader discourse on effective strategies for addressing academic skill deficiencies in higher education.
75-89
Robertson, Josh
297fb8e7-454c-4de4-b6ce-6e899969ff1d
Daniell, Alison
b1bb9317-db47-41c8-ad81-ab30fcf14565
Robertson, Josh
297fb8e7-454c-4de4-b6ce-6e899969ff1d
Daniell, Alison
b1bb9317-db47-41c8-ad81-ab30fcf14565

Robertson, Josh and Daniell, Alison (2024) Peer reviews for academic skills. Supporting engineering students on their writing journey. Journal of the Foundation Year Network, 6 (1), 75-89.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Peer reviews are an effective pedagogic approach for enhancing writing skills in higher education. Their benefits include improved engagement with feedback, increased use of higher-level cognitive skills, and enhanced engagement with independent learning. This study outlines an intervention aimed at introducing peer review sessions within an Engineering Foundation Year cohort. The rationale for introducing peer reviews into an academic skills module on this programme included the benefits outlined above as well as improving students’ reflective skills, fostering collegiality, and improving attendance at workshop sessions. Prior to peer review being introduced, a pre-intervention evaluation was carried out. This identified specific issues within the module which the secondary literature suggested could be mitigated by peer review techniques. A bespoke peer review model for the module was developed by the University’s Enhancement Team (academic skills staff). Module teaching staff (including PGRs) were then trained in appropriate peer review concepts and practices. Formative training for students focused on key elements of peer review, including clear written communication, referencing conventions, and structural issues. The research and writing assignment within the Routes to Success module incorporated the peer review sessions as an integral part of its design, and the quality of the reviews was assessed as part of students' overall performance grade. This study aims to investigate the impact of the intervention on students' writing abilities as well as their engagement with feedback and attendance, contributing to the broader discourse on effective strategies for addressing academic skill deficiencies in higher education.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 8 July 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492840
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492840
PURE UUID: 10f35f11-6f7f-41fc-8a0c-11bbe5bfabfe
ORCID for Josh Robertson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0002-7789-4543

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Aug 2024 16:57
Last modified: 16 Aug 2024 02:03

Export record

Contributors

Author: Josh Robertson ORCID iD
Author: Alison Daniell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×