Unmasking the role of dehumanization in obstetric violence
Unmasking the role of dehumanization in obstetric violence
Objective: obstetric violence is an increasingly recognized issue in the medical and public realms. Such violence refers to situations where women are subjected to abusive encounters with health care professionals, either through action or omission, during childbirth. Despite this increased awareness, research on the psychological factors contributing to it is lacking. This theoretical article proposes that dehumanization, which involves treating a person as less than human, is a crucial mechanism underlying obstetric violence.
Method: using insights from social psychological literature, we first describe the contextual and enduring factors contributing to dehumanization in medical settings. We then introduce a conceptual model for the dehumanization of women in obstetrics and gynecology.
Results: we propose that there are four mechanisms responsible for the dehumanization of women in obstetrics and gynecology: (a) the medicalization of birth and the perception of birth as a medical process, (b) the emphasis on women’s reproductive functions, (c) stereotypes about mothers as self-sacrificing, and (d) the belief that a healthy baby is the only outcome that matters. We argue that dehumanizing perceptions and attitudes can in turn result in the harmful experience of obstetric violence.
Conclusions: based on our discussion of the mechanisms, we propose maintaining factors and potential interventions to address and reduce this form of gender-based violence.
dehumanization, medicalization, obstetric violence, violence against women, women’s health
Kahalon, Rotem
72bc3783-2849-42d1-964f-5f3ec4739614
Klein, Verena
ae0b3b07-e55d-4793-bdc0-ceea23f00b9e
6 June 2024
Kahalon, Rotem
72bc3783-2849-42d1-964f-5f3ec4739614
Klein, Verena
ae0b3b07-e55d-4793-bdc0-ceea23f00b9e
Kahalon, Rotem and Klein, Verena
(2024)
Unmasking the role of dehumanization in obstetric violence.
Psychology of Violence.
(doi:10.1037/vio0000521).
Abstract
Objective: obstetric violence is an increasingly recognized issue in the medical and public realms. Such violence refers to situations where women are subjected to abusive encounters with health care professionals, either through action or omission, during childbirth. Despite this increased awareness, research on the psychological factors contributing to it is lacking. This theoretical article proposes that dehumanization, which involves treating a person as less than human, is a crucial mechanism underlying obstetric violence.
Method: using insights from social psychological literature, we first describe the contextual and enduring factors contributing to dehumanization in medical settings. We then introduce a conceptual model for the dehumanization of women in obstetrics and gynecology.
Results: we propose that there are four mechanisms responsible for the dehumanization of women in obstetrics and gynecology: (a) the medicalization of birth and the perception of birth as a medical process, (b) the emphasis on women’s reproductive functions, (c) stereotypes about mothers as self-sacrificing, and (d) the belief that a healthy baby is the only outcome that matters. We argue that dehumanizing perceptions and attitudes can in turn result in the harmful experience of obstetric violence.
Conclusions: based on our discussion of the mechanisms, we propose maintaining factors and potential interventions to address and reduce this form of gender-based violence.
Text
Manuscript OV 21.3C
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 23 March 2024
Published date: 6 June 2024
Keywords:
dehumanization, medicalization, obstetric violence, violence against women, women’s health
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 492841
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492841
ISSN: 2152-0828
PURE UUID: 629d4d82-ee62-4477-a105-293b734d09c0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Aug 2024 16:57
Last modified: 16 Aug 2024 02:07
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Rotem Kahalon
Author:
Verena Klein
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics