The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The effects of acute serotonin challenge on executive planning in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), their first-degree relatives, and healthy controls

The effects of acute serotonin challenge on executive planning in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), their first-degree relatives, and healthy controls
The effects of acute serotonin challenge on executive planning in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), their first-degree relatives, and healthy controls

Rationale: Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by executive function impairment and by clinical responsivity to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Executive planning deficits constitute a candidate endophenotype for OCD. It is not known whether this endophenotype is responsive to acute serotonin manipulation. Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effects of acute SSRI administration on executive function in patients with OCD, first-degree relatives of patients with OCD, and healthy controls. Methods: A randomized double-blind cross-over study assessed the effects of single-dose escitalopram (20 mg) and placebo on executive planning in 24 patients with OCD, 13 clinically unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with OCD, and 28 healthy controls. Performance on a Tower of London task measuring executive planning was assessed 4 h after oral administration of the pharmacological challenge/placebo and compared across and within groups using a mixed model analysis of variance. Results: On the outcome measure of interest, i.e., the mean number of choices to obtain the correct solution, there was a marginally significant effect of group (F(2, 59) = 3.1; p = 0.052), with patients (least square (LS) mean 1.43; standard error [SE] 0.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31–1.55) and their relatives (LS mean 1.46; SE 0.08; 95% CI, 1.30–1.62) performing worse than matched healthy controls (LS mean 1.26; SE 0.05; 95% CI, 1.15–1.37) on placebo. There was a trend towards a significant group × treatment interaction (F(2, 58) = 2.8, p = 0.069), with post hoc tests showing (i) patients (p = 0.009; LS mean difference 0.23; SE 0.08) and relatives (p = 0.03; LS mean difference 0.22; SE 0.10) were more impaired compared to controls and (ii) escitalopram was associated with improved executive planning in patients with OCD (p = 0.013; LS mean difference 0.1; SE 0.04), but not other groups (both p ' 0.1; controls: LS mean difference − 0.03; SE 0.04; relatives: LS mean difference 0.02; SE 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with a view that there is impaired executive planning in OCD and that this constitutes a behavioural endophenotype. In patients with OCD, but not in relatives, acute SSRI administration ameliorated this deficit. Further investigation is needed to understand common and differential involvement of neurochemical systems in patients with OCD and their relatives.

Endophenotype, Escitalopram, Executive functions, Obsessive–compulsive disorder, Pharmacological challenge, Serotonin
0033-3158
3117-3123
Lochner, Christine
8e428f81-855d-467b-9805-49e387f66683
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Kidd, Martin
7ea544cc-1f52-4c2d-a1ed-e86df13f0cb9
Taljaard, Lian
927ada4b-9fa8-48ad-b55f-280818d9962e
Fineberg, Naomi A.
157dcac1-9fb2-4197-81f3-0167e1224f05
Robbins, Trevor W.
20dd57dd-dbf3-4aaa-b7ba-bb4387ffcbc7
Stein, Dan J.
07cf0cbd-837d-49ac-aceb-1c393a2f3e00
Lochner, Christine
8e428f81-855d-467b-9805-49e387f66683
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Kidd, Martin
7ea544cc-1f52-4c2d-a1ed-e86df13f0cb9
Taljaard, Lian
927ada4b-9fa8-48ad-b55f-280818d9962e
Fineberg, Naomi A.
157dcac1-9fb2-4197-81f3-0167e1224f05
Robbins, Trevor W.
20dd57dd-dbf3-4aaa-b7ba-bb4387ffcbc7
Stein, Dan J.
07cf0cbd-837d-49ac-aceb-1c393a2f3e00

Lochner, Christine, Chamberlain, Samuel R., Kidd, Martin, Taljaard, Lian, Fineberg, Naomi A., Robbins, Trevor W. and Stein, Dan J. (2020) The effects of acute serotonin challenge on executive planning in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), their first-degree relatives, and healthy controls. Psychopharmacology, 237 (10), 3117-3123. (doi:10.1007/s00213-020-05597-7).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Rationale: Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by executive function impairment and by clinical responsivity to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Executive planning deficits constitute a candidate endophenotype for OCD. It is not known whether this endophenotype is responsive to acute serotonin manipulation. Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effects of acute SSRI administration on executive function in patients with OCD, first-degree relatives of patients with OCD, and healthy controls. Methods: A randomized double-blind cross-over study assessed the effects of single-dose escitalopram (20 mg) and placebo on executive planning in 24 patients with OCD, 13 clinically unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with OCD, and 28 healthy controls. Performance on a Tower of London task measuring executive planning was assessed 4 h after oral administration of the pharmacological challenge/placebo and compared across and within groups using a mixed model analysis of variance. Results: On the outcome measure of interest, i.e., the mean number of choices to obtain the correct solution, there was a marginally significant effect of group (F(2, 59) = 3.1; p = 0.052), with patients (least square (LS) mean 1.43; standard error [SE] 0.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31–1.55) and their relatives (LS mean 1.46; SE 0.08; 95% CI, 1.30–1.62) performing worse than matched healthy controls (LS mean 1.26; SE 0.05; 95% CI, 1.15–1.37) on placebo. There was a trend towards a significant group × treatment interaction (F(2, 58) = 2.8, p = 0.069), with post hoc tests showing (i) patients (p = 0.009; LS mean difference 0.23; SE 0.08) and relatives (p = 0.03; LS mean difference 0.22; SE 0.10) were more impaired compared to controls and (ii) escitalopram was associated with improved executive planning in patients with OCD (p = 0.013; LS mean difference 0.1; SE 0.04), but not other groups (both p ' 0.1; controls: LS mean difference − 0.03; SE 0.04; relatives: LS mean difference 0.02; SE 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with a view that there is impaired executive planning in OCD and that this constitutes a behavioural endophenotype. In patients with OCD, but not in relatives, acute SSRI administration ameliorated this deficit. Further investigation is needed to understand common and differential involvement of neurochemical systems in patients with OCD and their relatives.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 October 2020
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: Endophenotype, Escitalopram, Executive functions, Obsessive–compulsive disorder, Pharmacological challenge, Serotonin

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492987
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492987
ISSN: 0033-3158
PURE UUID: 6f7bc8ae-57f8-4e40-9087-2d77b4f7f133
ORCID for Samuel R. Chamberlain: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-8121

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Aug 2024 17:07
Last modified: 22 Aug 2024 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christine Lochner
Author: Samuel R. Chamberlain ORCID iD
Author: Martin Kidd
Author: Lian Taljaard
Author: Naomi A. Fineberg
Author: Trevor W. Robbins
Author: Dan J. Stein

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×