The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

CHIPS-Child: Testing the developmental programming hypothesis in the offspring of the CHIPS trial

CHIPS-Child: Testing the developmental programming hypothesis in the offspring of the CHIPS trial
CHIPS-Child: Testing the developmental programming hypothesis in the offspring of the CHIPS trial

Objectives: As a follow-up to the CHIPS trial (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study) of ‘less tight’ (versus ‘tight’) control of maternal blood pressure in pregnancy, CHIPS-Child investigated potential developmental programming of maternal blood pressure control in pregnancy, by examining measures of postnatal growth rate and hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis activation. Methods: CHIPS follow-up was extended to 12 ± 2 months corrected post-gestational age for anthropometry (weight, length, head/waist circumference). For eligible children with consent for a study visit, we collected biological samples (hair/buccal samples) to evaluate HPA axis function (hair cortisol levels) and epigenetic change (DNA methylation analysis of buccal cells). The primary outcome was ‘change in z-score for weight’ between birth and 12 ± 2 mos. Secondary outcomes were hair cortisol and genome-wide DNA methylation status. Results: Of 683 eligible babies, 183 (26.8%) were lost to follow-up, 83 (12.2%) declined, 3 (0.4%) agreed only to ongoing contact, and 414 (60.6%) consented. 372/414 (89.9%) had weight measured at 12mos. In ‘less tight’ (vs. ‘tight’) control, the primary outcome was similar [−0.26 (−0.53, +0.01); p = 0.14, padjusted = 0.06]; median (95% confidence interval) hair cortisol (N = 35 samples) was lower [−496 (−892, −100) ng/g; p = 0.02], and buccal swab DNA methylation (N = 16 samples) was similar. No differences in growth rate could be demonstrated up to 5 years. Conclusions: Results demonstrate no compelling evidence for developmental programming of growth or the HPA axis. Clinicians should look to the clinical findings of CHIPS to guide practice. Researchers should seek to replicate these findings and extend outcomes to paediatric blood pressure and neurodevelopment.

Birthweight, Development, DOHaD, Growth, Hypertension, Plasticity, Pregnancy
2210-7789
15-22
Magee, Laura A.
12dc7d1f-b93a-421f-8f47-46e436e5cc30
Synnes, Anne R.
5bf569ae-f3fb-45e3-b2c5-dee3a7cd739d
von Dadelszen, Peter
1e93eb1e-6552-415a-9e58-9a60bd596610
Hutfield, Anna M.
01bedf3b-9ebf-4c04-a808-5785ac3ed239
Chanoine, Jean Pierre
4810dc33-0423-4125-9b95-29e51b477418
Côté, Anne Marie
4dc106ea-ccf6-4f76-8c1b-5b6a65c11f92
Devlin, Angela M.
9b2302f9-76d9-484d-9951-98c78694b272
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Gafni, Amiram
6c10f120-65e0-440f-b8b9-972b56215360
Ganzevoort, Wessel
51b299fd-7b3f-4cf0-9fe5-634510e88952
Helewa, Michael E.
87339f5f-a07f-4d8e-a4cd-1937f20b42fa
Hutton, Eileen K.
d140de6c-1bde-48db-a842-4904fd249a01
Koren, Gideon
88097339-495d-467e-b61a-a7ec5a73426f
Lee, Shoo K.
b4771f85-6bc5-4eef-aad3-a4e1d5323fdb
Mcarthur, Dawn
01ff2916-9d8d-4297-911a-cb07c0aa2b89
Rey, Evelyne
28dfc766-76a4-4bb8-b2a6-7652c7632a57
Robinson, Wendy P.
c6b92b39-caef-4ed1-954e-1450fcc77f9a
Roseboom, Tessa J.
ca016399-99d7-4918-9572-e3d37d20f1b6
Singer, Joel
0d909cb1-3062-46e1-93e8-258214dfac18
Wilson, Samantha
af838d41-c8e4-4557-b53f-8bc56748dce1
Moutquin, Jean Marie
a2837e28-54e4-4c4b-91d1-abcecf88cab9
the CHIPS-Child Study Group (Table S1)
Magee, Laura A.
12dc7d1f-b93a-421f-8f47-46e436e5cc30
Synnes, Anne R.
5bf569ae-f3fb-45e3-b2c5-dee3a7cd739d
von Dadelszen, Peter
1e93eb1e-6552-415a-9e58-9a60bd596610
Hutfield, Anna M.
01bedf3b-9ebf-4c04-a808-5785ac3ed239
Chanoine, Jean Pierre
4810dc33-0423-4125-9b95-29e51b477418
Côté, Anne Marie
4dc106ea-ccf6-4f76-8c1b-5b6a65c11f92
Devlin, Angela M.
9b2302f9-76d9-484d-9951-98c78694b272
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Gafni, Amiram
6c10f120-65e0-440f-b8b9-972b56215360
Ganzevoort, Wessel
51b299fd-7b3f-4cf0-9fe5-634510e88952
Helewa, Michael E.
87339f5f-a07f-4d8e-a4cd-1937f20b42fa
Hutton, Eileen K.
d140de6c-1bde-48db-a842-4904fd249a01
Koren, Gideon
88097339-495d-467e-b61a-a7ec5a73426f
Lee, Shoo K.
b4771f85-6bc5-4eef-aad3-a4e1d5323fdb
Mcarthur, Dawn
01ff2916-9d8d-4297-911a-cb07c0aa2b89
Rey, Evelyne
28dfc766-76a4-4bb8-b2a6-7652c7632a57
Robinson, Wendy P.
c6b92b39-caef-4ed1-954e-1450fcc77f9a
Roseboom, Tessa J.
ca016399-99d7-4918-9572-e3d37d20f1b6
Singer, Joel
0d909cb1-3062-46e1-93e8-258214dfac18
Wilson, Samantha
af838d41-c8e4-4557-b53f-8bc56748dce1
Moutquin, Jean Marie
a2837e28-54e4-4c4b-91d1-abcecf88cab9

the CHIPS-Child Study Group (Table S1) (2018) CHIPS-Child: Testing the developmental programming hypothesis in the offspring of the CHIPS trial. Pregnancy Hypertension, 14, 15-22. (doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2018.04.021).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: As a follow-up to the CHIPS trial (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study) of ‘less tight’ (versus ‘tight’) control of maternal blood pressure in pregnancy, CHIPS-Child investigated potential developmental programming of maternal blood pressure control in pregnancy, by examining measures of postnatal growth rate and hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis activation. Methods: CHIPS follow-up was extended to 12 ± 2 months corrected post-gestational age for anthropometry (weight, length, head/waist circumference). For eligible children with consent for a study visit, we collected biological samples (hair/buccal samples) to evaluate HPA axis function (hair cortisol levels) and epigenetic change (DNA methylation analysis of buccal cells). The primary outcome was ‘change in z-score for weight’ between birth and 12 ± 2 mos. Secondary outcomes were hair cortisol and genome-wide DNA methylation status. Results: Of 683 eligible babies, 183 (26.8%) were lost to follow-up, 83 (12.2%) declined, 3 (0.4%) agreed only to ongoing contact, and 414 (60.6%) consented. 372/414 (89.9%) had weight measured at 12mos. In ‘less tight’ (vs. ‘tight’) control, the primary outcome was similar [−0.26 (−0.53, +0.01); p = 0.14, padjusted = 0.06]; median (95% confidence interval) hair cortisol (N = 35 samples) was lower [−496 (−892, −100) ng/g; p = 0.02], and buccal swab DNA methylation (N = 16 samples) was similar. No differences in growth rate could be demonstrated up to 5 years. Conclusions: Results demonstrate no compelling evidence for developmental programming of growth or the HPA axis. Clinicians should look to the clinical findings of CHIPS to guide practice. Researchers should seek to replicate these findings and extend outcomes to paediatric blood pressure and neurodevelopment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 19 April 2018
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Authors
Keywords: Birthweight, Development, DOHaD, Growth, Hypertension, Plasticity, Pregnancy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493014
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493014
ISSN: 2210-7789
PURE UUID: af7c654a-907b-4f32-8bed-56c8247cd3f0
ORCID for Jon Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Aug 2024 17:15
Last modified: 22 Aug 2024 02:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Laura A. Magee
Author: Anne R. Synnes
Author: Peter von Dadelszen
Author: Anna M. Hutfield
Author: Jean Pierre Chanoine
Author: Anne Marie Côté
Author: Angela M. Devlin
Author: Jon Dorling ORCID iD
Author: Amiram Gafni
Author: Wessel Ganzevoort
Author: Michael E. Helewa
Author: Eileen K. Hutton
Author: Gideon Koren
Author: Shoo K. Lee
Author: Dawn Mcarthur
Author: Evelyne Rey
Author: Wendy P. Robinson
Author: Tessa J. Roseboom
Author: Joel Singer
Author: Samantha Wilson
Author: Jean Marie Moutquin
Corporate Author: the CHIPS-Child Study Group (Table S1)

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×