The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers

Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers
Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers

Objective: It has been theorized that there may be subtypes of pathological gambling, particularly in relation to the main type of gambling activities undertaken. Whether or not putative pathological gambling subtypes differ in terms of their clinical and cognitive profiles has received little attention. Method: Subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling were grouped into two categories of preferred forms of gambling - strategic (e.g., cards, dice, sports betting, stock market) and non-strategic (e.g., slots, video poker, pull tabs). Groups were compared on clinical characteristics (gambling severity, and time and money spent gambling), psychiatric comorbidity, and neurocognitive tests assessing motor impulsivity and cognitive flexibility. Results: Seventy-seven subjects were included in this sample (45.5% females; mean age: 42.7 ± 14.9) which consisted of the following groups: strategic (n = 22; 28.6%) and non-strategic (n = 55; 71.4%). Non-strategic gamblers were significantly more likely to be older, female, and divorced. Money spent gambling did not differ significantly between groups although one measure of gambling severity reflected more severe problems for strategic gamblers. Strategic and non-strategic gamblers did not differ in terms of cognitive function; both groups showed impairments in cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control relative to matched healthy volunteers. Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that preferred form of gambling may be associated with specific clinical characteristics but are not dissociable in terms of cognitive inflexibility and motor impulsivity.

Cognition, Gambling, Impulsivity
0278-5846
336-340
Grant, Jon E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3
Odlaug, Brian L.
f021d299-d250-44a2-bb17-6f7e16bfa0f6
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Schreiber, Liana R.N.
5d659814-23de-4dec-b9d4-5341ad99738b
Grant, Jon E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3
Odlaug, Brian L.
f021d299-d250-44a2-bb17-6f7e16bfa0f6
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Schreiber, Liana R.N.
5d659814-23de-4dec-b9d4-5341ad99738b

Grant, Jon E., Odlaug, Brian L., Chamberlain, Samuel R. and Schreiber, Liana R.N. (2012) Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 38 (2), 336-340. (doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.05.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: It has been theorized that there may be subtypes of pathological gambling, particularly in relation to the main type of gambling activities undertaken. Whether or not putative pathological gambling subtypes differ in terms of their clinical and cognitive profiles has received little attention. Method: Subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling were grouped into two categories of preferred forms of gambling - strategic (e.g., cards, dice, sports betting, stock market) and non-strategic (e.g., slots, video poker, pull tabs). Groups were compared on clinical characteristics (gambling severity, and time and money spent gambling), psychiatric comorbidity, and neurocognitive tests assessing motor impulsivity and cognitive flexibility. Results: Seventy-seven subjects were included in this sample (45.5% females; mean age: 42.7 ± 14.9) which consisted of the following groups: strategic (n = 22; 28.6%) and non-strategic (n = 55; 71.4%). Non-strategic gamblers were significantly more likely to be older, female, and divorced. Money spent gambling did not differ significantly between groups although one measure of gambling severity reflected more severe problems for strategic gamblers. Strategic and non-strategic gamblers did not differ in terms of cognitive function; both groups showed impairments in cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control relative to matched healthy volunteers. Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that preferred form of gambling may be associated with specific clinical characteristics but are not dissociable in terms of cognitive inflexibility and motor impulsivity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 7 August 2012
Keywords: Cognition, Gambling, Impulsivity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493099
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493099
ISSN: 0278-5846
PURE UUID: 8f0a0647-4966-487e-b346-97011270fec8
ORCID for Samuel R. Chamberlain: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-8121

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Aug 2024 17:21
Last modified: 23 Aug 2024 01:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jon E. Grant
Author: Brian L. Odlaug
Author: Samuel R. Chamberlain ORCID iD
Author: Liana R.N. Schreiber

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×