Characterizing utilitarian aggregation of open knowledge
Characterizing utilitarian aggregation of open knowledge
Recent initiatives in "open data" have resulted in good quality, freely available, tabular datasets on the web. However, such datasets are fragmented and arbitrarily structured and are not of much utility in isolation. To address this, there are several "open knowledge" initiatives that aim to stitch together open data elements into semantically meaningful structures. But such efforts are met with unique challenges. We argue in this paper that knowledge aggregation can be of two kinds -- encyclopedic aggregation, which aims to elucidate, and utilitarian aggregation, which aims to create actionable knowledge elements. We also argue that utilitarian aggregation is a characteristically different problem from that of conventional efforts like Freebase or DBpedia that address encyclopedic aggregation. In addition, when it comes to utilitarian knowledge, we observe that openness is not a binary condition and instead there is a need to distinguish between knowledge that is "open-ended" and knowledge that is "open." We formalize the notion of open knowledge based on how much knowledge or control does the creator of the knowledge element have about its consumers. Based on these arguments, we propose an underlying knowledge representation framework for encoding open utilitarian knowledge.
1-11
Srinivasa, Srinath
b4e35d32-beae-4c6e-a4f8-3ee56e75d648
Agrawal, Sweety v.
e1cb4f01-a0bd-4e57-88ed-7117eae1a896
Jog, Chinmay
bfb77c95-776f-4477-8e62-1b1961e2cde9
Deshmukh, Jayati
5903b0c1-b4d1-4fbf-b687-610d4fde3990
21 March 2014
Srinivasa, Srinath
b4e35d32-beae-4c6e-a4f8-3ee56e75d648
Agrawal, Sweety v.
e1cb4f01-a0bd-4e57-88ed-7117eae1a896
Jog, Chinmay
bfb77c95-776f-4477-8e62-1b1961e2cde9
Deshmukh, Jayati
5903b0c1-b4d1-4fbf-b687-610d4fde3990
Srinivasa, Srinath, Agrawal, Sweety v., Jog, Chinmay and Deshmukh, Jayati
(2014)
Characterizing utilitarian aggregation of open knowledge.
In CODS '14: Proceedings of the 1st IKDD Conference on Data Sciences.
ACM Press.
.
(doi:10.1145/2567688.2567689).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Recent initiatives in "open data" have resulted in good quality, freely available, tabular datasets on the web. However, such datasets are fragmented and arbitrarily structured and are not of much utility in isolation. To address this, there are several "open knowledge" initiatives that aim to stitch together open data elements into semantically meaningful structures. But such efforts are met with unique challenges. We argue in this paper that knowledge aggregation can be of two kinds -- encyclopedic aggregation, which aims to elucidate, and utilitarian aggregation, which aims to create actionable knowledge elements. We also argue that utilitarian aggregation is a characteristically different problem from that of conventional efforts like Freebase or DBpedia that address encyclopedic aggregation. In addition, when it comes to utilitarian knowledge, we observe that openness is not a binary condition and instead there is a need to distinguish between knowledge that is "open-ended" and knowledge that is "open." We formalize the notion of open knowledge based on how much knowledge or control does the creator of the knowledge element have about its consumers. Based on these arguments, we propose an underlying knowledge representation framework for encoding open utilitarian knowledge.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 21 March 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493167
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493167
PURE UUID: f13b53b0-a2eb-4372-be9d-0e8c099c84e4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Aug 2024 17:08
Last modified: 24 Aug 2024 02:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Srinath Srinivasa
Author:
Sweety v. Agrawal
Author:
Chinmay Jog
Author:
Jayati Deshmukh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics