Addressing implicit bias: a theoretical model for promoting integrative reflective practice in live-client law clinics
Addressing implicit bias: a theoretical model for promoting integrative reflective practice in live-client law clinics
Despite the proliferation of Clinical Legal Education programmes in England and Wales, such as live-client clinics, legal education and training in England and Wales continues to be predominantly focused on the analysis and application of rules, doctrines, and theories to hypothetical scenarios or essay questions. This form of pedagogy either minimises or ignores the role of the client in terms of supplying lawyers with knowledge pertinent to their case. In other words, it overlooks the fact that the lawyers’ acquisition of knowledge is not confined to technical rationality. This article seeks to achieve three broad aims. First, to contribute to the debate concerning the epistemology of reflective practice. Second, to develop a theoretical reflective cycle, informed by Kant’s transcendental idealism, which seeks maximise knowledge acquisition in legal education, namely knowledge supplied by the client. Third, to address implicit bias using the proposed reflective cycle. An optimal pedagogy for using this cycle is Clinical Legal Education, namely live client clinics.
55-87
Madhloom, Omar
50eccbe7-bad0-48de-a1da-a4fa995f695e
Johnson, Marc
7a5cee06-d0b6-494e-96ef-0afc0f09a08b
10 June 2024
Madhloom, Omar
50eccbe7-bad0-48de-a1da-a4fa995f695e
Johnson, Marc
7a5cee06-d0b6-494e-96ef-0afc0f09a08b
Madhloom, Omar and Johnson, Marc
(2024)
Addressing implicit bias: a theoretical model for promoting integrative reflective practice in live-client law clinics.
European Journal of Legal Education, 5 (1), , [1].
Abstract
Despite the proliferation of Clinical Legal Education programmes in England and Wales, such as live-client clinics, legal education and training in England and Wales continues to be predominantly focused on the analysis and application of rules, doctrines, and theories to hypothetical scenarios or essay questions. This form of pedagogy either minimises or ignores the role of the client in terms of supplying lawyers with knowledge pertinent to their case. In other words, it overlooks the fact that the lawyers’ acquisition of knowledge is not confined to technical rationality. This article seeks to achieve three broad aims. First, to contribute to the debate concerning the epistemology of reflective practice. Second, to develop a theoretical reflective cycle, informed by Kant’s transcendental idealism, which seeks maximise knowledge acquisition in legal education, namely knowledge supplied by the client. Third, to address implicit bias using the proposed reflective cycle. An optimal pedagogy for using this cycle is Clinical Legal Education, namely live client clinics.
Text
80-Article Text-366-1-10-20240627
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 May 2024
Published date: 10 June 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493181
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493181
ISSN: 1750-4686
PURE UUID: cef9f3d8-79b7-4b6b-b7a5-e228bf906a12
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Aug 2024 16:48
Last modified: 28 Aug 2024 02:13
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Omar Madhloom
Author:
Marc Johnson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics