The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Actions, thought-experiments and the ‘Principle of alternate Possibilities’

Alvarez, Maria (2009) Actions, thought-experiments and the ‘Principle of alternate Possibilities’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87, (1), pp. 61-68. (doi:10.1080/00048400802215505).

Record type: Article


In 1969 Harry Frankfurt published his hugely influential paper ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’ in which he claimed to present a counterexample to the so-called ‘Principle of Alternate Possibilities’ (‘a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could have done otherwise’). The success of Frankfurt-style cases as counterexamples to the Principle has been much debated since. I present an objection to these cases that, in questioning their conceptual cogency, undercuts many of those debates. Such cases all require a counterfactual mechanism that could cause an agent to perform an action that he cannot avoid performing. I argue that, given our concept of what it is for someone to act, this requirement is inconsistent.
Frankfurt-style alleged counterexamples are cases where an agent is morally responsible for an action he performs even though, the claim goes, he could not have avoided performing that action. However, it has recently been argued, e.g. by John Fischer, that a counterexample to the Principle could be a ‘Fischer-style case’, i.e. a case where the agent can either perform the action or do nothing else. I argue that, although Fischer-style cases do not share the conceptual flaw common to all Frankfurt-style cases, they also fail as counterexamples to the Principle.
The paper finishes with a brief discussion of the significance of the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.

PDF ActionsThoughtExperiementsPAP.pdf - Author's Original
Download (362kB)

More information

Published date: March 2009


Local EPrints ID: 49325
ISSN: 0004-8402
PURE UUID: 75b55856-d6ea-49e3-aaff-52b48d59f3b3

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Oct 2007
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 14:56

Export record



Author: Maria Alvarez

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.