A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity
A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity
Background As a behavioral addiction with clinical and phenomenological similarities to substance addiction, recreational and pathological gambling represent models for studying the neurobiology of addiction, without the confounding deleterious brain effects which may occur from chronic substance abuse.Method A community sample of individuals aged 18-65 years who gamble was solicited through newspaper advertising. Subjects were grouped a priori into three groups (no-risk, at-risk, and pathological gamblers) based on a diagnostic interview. All subjects underwent a psychiatric clinical interview and neurocognitive tests assessing motor impulsivity and cognitive flexibility. Subjects with a current axis I disorder, history of brain injury/trauma, or implementation or dose changes of psychoactive medication within 6 weeks of study enrollment were excluded.Results A total of 135 no-risk, 69 at-risk and 46 pathological gambling subjects were assessed. Pathological gamblers were significantly older, and exhibited significant deficiencies in motor impulse control (stop-signal reaction times), response speed (median 'go' trial response latency) and cognitive flexibility [total intra-dimensional/extra-dimensional (IDED) errors] versus controls. The finding of impaired impulse control and cognitive flexibility was robust in an age-matched subgroup analysis of pathological gamblers. The no-risk and at-risk gambling groups did not significantly differ from each other on task performance.Conclusions Impaired response inhibition and cognitive flexibility exist in people with pathological gambling compared with no-risk and at-risk gamblers. The early identification of such illness in adolescence or young adulthood may aid in the prevention of addiction onset of such disabling disorders.
Cognition, gambling, impulsivity
2111-2119
Odlaug, B. L.
f021d299-d250-44a2-bb17-6f7e16bfa0f6
Chamberlain, S. R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Kim, S. W.
88bf8eb3-4e12-4f40-a11b-08b3479c177a
Schreiber, L. R.N.
5d659814-23de-4dec-b9d4-5341ad99738b
Grant, J. E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3
October 2011
Odlaug, B. L.
f021d299-d250-44a2-bb17-6f7e16bfa0f6
Chamberlain, S. R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Kim, S. W.
88bf8eb3-4e12-4f40-a11b-08b3479c177a
Schreiber, L. R.N.
5d659814-23de-4dec-b9d4-5341ad99738b
Grant, J. E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3
Odlaug, B. L., Chamberlain, S. R., Kim, S. W., Schreiber, L. R.N. and Grant, J. E.
(2011)
A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity.
Psychological Medicine, 41 (10), .
(doi:10.1017/S0033291711000316).
Abstract
Background As a behavioral addiction with clinical and phenomenological similarities to substance addiction, recreational and pathological gambling represent models for studying the neurobiology of addiction, without the confounding deleterious brain effects which may occur from chronic substance abuse.Method A community sample of individuals aged 18-65 years who gamble was solicited through newspaper advertising. Subjects were grouped a priori into three groups (no-risk, at-risk, and pathological gamblers) based on a diagnostic interview. All subjects underwent a psychiatric clinical interview and neurocognitive tests assessing motor impulsivity and cognitive flexibility. Subjects with a current axis I disorder, history of brain injury/trauma, or implementation or dose changes of psychoactive medication within 6 weeks of study enrollment were excluded.Results A total of 135 no-risk, 69 at-risk and 46 pathological gambling subjects were assessed. Pathological gamblers were significantly older, and exhibited significant deficiencies in motor impulse control (stop-signal reaction times), response speed (median 'go' trial response latency) and cognitive flexibility [total intra-dimensional/extra-dimensional (IDED) errors] versus controls. The finding of impaired impulse control and cognitive flexibility was robust in an age-matched subgroup analysis of pathological gamblers. The no-risk and at-risk gambling groups did not significantly differ from each other on task performance.Conclusions Impaired response inhibition and cognitive flexibility exist in people with pathological gambling compared with no-risk and at-risk gamblers. The early identification of such illness in adolescence or young adulthood may aid in the prevention of addiction onset of such disabling disorders.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2011
Keywords:
Cognition, gambling, impulsivity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493293
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493293
ISSN: 0033-2917
PURE UUID: 195cccb1-73d1-4d86-acb0-fa074b642e5e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Aug 2024 16:42
Last modified: 30 Aug 2024 02:00
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
B. L. Odlaug
Author:
S. R. Chamberlain
Author:
S. W. Kim
Author:
L. R.N. Schreiber
Author:
J. E. Grant
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics