The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity

A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity
A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity

Background As a behavioral addiction with clinical and phenomenological similarities to substance addiction, recreational and pathological gambling represent models for studying the neurobiology of addiction, without the confounding deleterious brain effects which may occur from chronic substance abuse.Method A community sample of individuals aged 18-65 years who gamble was solicited through newspaper advertising. Subjects were grouped a priori into three groups (no-risk, at-risk, and pathological gamblers) based on a diagnostic interview. All subjects underwent a psychiatric clinical interview and neurocognitive tests assessing motor impulsivity and cognitive flexibility. Subjects with a current axis I disorder, history of brain injury/trauma, or implementation or dose changes of psychoactive medication within 6 weeks of study enrollment were excluded.Results A total of 135 no-risk, 69 at-risk and 46 pathological gambling subjects were assessed. Pathological gamblers were significantly older, and exhibited significant deficiencies in motor impulse control (stop-signal reaction times), response speed (median 'go' trial response latency) and cognitive flexibility [total intra-dimensional/extra-dimensional (IDED) errors] versus controls. The finding of impaired impulse control and cognitive flexibility was robust in an age-matched subgroup analysis of pathological gamblers. The no-risk and at-risk gambling groups did not significantly differ from each other on task performance.Conclusions Impaired response inhibition and cognitive flexibility exist in people with pathological gambling compared with no-risk and at-risk gamblers. The early identification of such illness in adolescence or young adulthood may aid in the prevention of addiction onset of such disabling disorders.

Cognition, gambling, impulsivity
0033-2917
2111-2119
Odlaug, B. L.
f021d299-d250-44a2-bb17-6f7e16bfa0f6
Chamberlain, S. R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Kim, S. W.
88bf8eb3-4e12-4f40-a11b-08b3479c177a
Schreiber, L. R.N.
5d659814-23de-4dec-b9d4-5341ad99738b
Grant, J. E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3
Odlaug, B. L.
f021d299-d250-44a2-bb17-6f7e16bfa0f6
Chamberlain, S. R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Kim, S. W.
88bf8eb3-4e12-4f40-a11b-08b3479c177a
Schreiber, L. R.N.
5d659814-23de-4dec-b9d4-5341ad99738b
Grant, J. E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3

Odlaug, B. L., Chamberlain, S. R., Kim, S. W., Schreiber, L. R.N. and Grant, J. E. (2011) A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity. Psychological Medicine, 41 (10), 2111-2119. (doi:10.1017/S0033291711000316).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background As a behavioral addiction with clinical and phenomenological similarities to substance addiction, recreational and pathological gambling represent models for studying the neurobiology of addiction, without the confounding deleterious brain effects which may occur from chronic substance abuse.Method A community sample of individuals aged 18-65 years who gamble was solicited through newspaper advertising. Subjects were grouped a priori into three groups (no-risk, at-risk, and pathological gamblers) based on a diagnostic interview. All subjects underwent a psychiatric clinical interview and neurocognitive tests assessing motor impulsivity and cognitive flexibility. Subjects with a current axis I disorder, history of brain injury/trauma, or implementation or dose changes of psychoactive medication within 6 weeks of study enrollment were excluded.Results A total of 135 no-risk, 69 at-risk and 46 pathological gambling subjects were assessed. Pathological gamblers were significantly older, and exhibited significant deficiencies in motor impulse control (stop-signal reaction times), response speed (median 'go' trial response latency) and cognitive flexibility [total intra-dimensional/extra-dimensional (IDED) errors] versus controls. The finding of impaired impulse control and cognitive flexibility was robust in an age-matched subgroup analysis of pathological gamblers. The no-risk and at-risk gambling groups did not significantly differ from each other on task performance.Conclusions Impaired response inhibition and cognitive flexibility exist in people with pathological gambling compared with no-risk and at-risk gamblers. The early identification of such illness in adolescence or young adulthood may aid in the prevention of addiction onset of such disabling disorders.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2011
Keywords: Cognition, gambling, impulsivity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493293
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493293
ISSN: 0033-2917
PURE UUID: 195cccb1-73d1-4d86-acb0-fa074b642e5e
ORCID for S. R. Chamberlain: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-8121

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Aug 2024 16:42
Last modified: 30 Aug 2024 02:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: B. L. Odlaug
Author: S. R. Chamberlain ORCID iD
Author: S. W. Kim
Author: L. R.N. Schreiber
Author: J. E. Grant

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×