The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring how patients are supported to use online services in primary care in England through "digital facilitation": survey study

Exploring how patients are supported to use online services in primary care in England through "digital facilitation": survey study
Exploring how patients are supported to use online services in primary care in England through "digital facilitation": survey study

Background: health service policy in many jurisdictions is driving greater investment into digital primary care services. While some patients and practices may benefit, there are concerns that not all are able or wish to access primary care services online. “Digital facilitation” is the “range of processes, procedures, and personnel seeking to support patients in their uptake and use of online services” and may address such concerns. 

Objective: as part of a multimethod research program, we undertook surveys of practice staff and patients to gain insight into the support being offered by practices and explore patients’ experiences of this support. 

Methods: general practices from 4 regions of England were sent a questionnaire exploring the modes of digital facilitation offered, the personnel involved in its delivery, and views on the motivations and drivers for providing support. Moreover, 12,822 patients registered with 62 general practices (predominantly those providing practice survey responses) were sent a questionnaire exploring their experiences of any support offered by their practice to use online services. 

Results: almost one-third of practices (156/500, 31.2%) responded to the practice survey, with most reporting using passive modes of digital facilitation (eg, display, leaflets, and SMS text messages) and few using active modes (eg, offering tablets or computers or using practice champions). However, 90.9% (130/143) reported providing ad hoc support. Practices agreed that it was the responsibility of both the practice (105/144, 72.9%) and the wider National Health Service (118/143, 82.5%) to support patients in using online services and that providing such support benefited the practice (126/144, 87.5%) and their patients (132/144, 91.7%). Nearly a quarter of the patients (3051/12,822, 23.8%) responded to the patient survey, with few (522/3051, 17.11% or less) reporting awareness of any modes of digital facilitation apart from text messages and emails (1205/3051, 39.5%) and only 13.36% (392/2935) reporting receiving support to use online services. Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that older patients had a lower likelihood of 4 outcomes: being aware of, or of using, digital facilitation efforts, or being told about or being helped to use online services (all P<.05), particularly with regard to being helped to use online services (adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 years versus those aged 55-64 years: 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.36). However, ethnic minority participants or those for whom their first language was not English had positive associations with these outcomes. 

Conclusions: general practices recognize that patients would benefit from support to access online services. However, the support provided is often passive or ad hoc, and patients were seldom aware of digital facilitation efforts that their practice provided. There is potential to increase engagement with online primary care services by providing more support for all patients, particularly to provide targeted support for older patients.

Adolescent, Adult, Aged, England, Female, Humans, Internet, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, inequalities, remote consultation, digital support, health services research, access to online health care services, general practice, primary care, survey, digital technology, online services
1438-8871
Winder, Rachel
a186785d-78f1-4c0d-9295-f7fb4a4ce2df
Campbell, John L.
07cffd7d-3b19-409e-aabf-46531ac4c4de
Akter, Nurunnahar
432c7e63-80e3-437d-9e0c-4e49a0f92492
Aminu, Abodunrin Q.
a8350fe9-d637-45be-866b-d22bfe93dc7e
Lambert, Jeffrey
159c7740-acda-4f21-87c3-52359617eb15
Cockcroft, Emma
baba7e30-4d5b-4a93-925c-1a2a936f5a9c
Thomas, Chloe
2af463a8-c25a-4660-bb21-c2b70f57d25c
Clark, Christopher E.
5049293e-3120-417b-8ee4-9d85924120e4
Bryce, Carol
9df60565-94a0-4a12-bb77-20c73c2eaf4c
Sussex, Jon
00d45951-beb0-4664-8d8a-b8a9a2538501
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Marriott, Christine
1af844b8-5a0c-4be3-afb8-8874d48dd62e
Abel, Gary
d14838f4-2a59-4dec-b3ac-527030888e44
Winder, Rachel
a186785d-78f1-4c0d-9295-f7fb4a4ce2df
Campbell, John L.
07cffd7d-3b19-409e-aabf-46531ac4c4de
Akter, Nurunnahar
432c7e63-80e3-437d-9e0c-4e49a0f92492
Aminu, Abodunrin Q.
a8350fe9-d637-45be-866b-d22bfe93dc7e
Lambert, Jeffrey
159c7740-acda-4f21-87c3-52359617eb15
Cockcroft, Emma
baba7e30-4d5b-4a93-925c-1a2a936f5a9c
Thomas, Chloe
2af463a8-c25a-4660-bb21-c2b70f57d25c
Clark, Christopher E.
5049293e-3120-417b-8ee4-9d85924120e4
Bryce, Carol
9df60565-94a0-4a12-bb77-20c73c2eaf4c
Sussex, Jon
00d45951-beb0-4664-8d8a-b8a9a2538501
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Marriott, Christine
1af844b8-5a0c-4be3-afb8-8874d48dd62e
Abel, Gary
d14838f4-2a59-4dec-b3ac-527030888e44

Winder, Rachel, Campbell, John L., Akter, Nurunnahar, Aminu, Abodunrin Q., Lambert, Jeffrey, Cockcroft, Emma, Thomas, Chloe, Clark, Christopher E., Bryce, Carol, Sussex, Jon, Atherton, Helen, Marriott, Christine and Abel, Gary (2024) Exploring how patients are supported to use online services in primary care in England through "digital facilitation": survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, [e56528]. (doi:10.2196/56528).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: health service policy in many jurisdictions is driving greater investment into digital primary care services. While some patients and practices may benefit, there are concerns that not all are able or wish to access primary care services online. “Digital facilitation” is the “range of processes, procedures, and personnel seeking to support patients in their uptake and use of online services” and may address such concerns. 

Objective: as part of a multimethod research program, we undertook surveys of practice staff and patients to gain insight into the support being offered by practices and explore patients’ experiences of this support. 

Methods: general practices from 4 regions of England were sent a questionnaire exploring the modes of digital facilitation offered, the personnel involved in its delivery, and views on the motivations and drivers for providing support. Moreover, 12,822 patients registered with 62 general practices (predominantly those providing practice survey responses) were sent a questionnaire exploring their experiences of any support offered by their practice to use online services. 

Results: almost one-third of practices (156/500, 31.2%) responded to the practice survey, with most reporting using passive modes of digital facilitation (eg, display, leaflets, and SMS text messages) and few using active modes (eg, offering tablets or computers or using practice champions). However, 90.9% (130/143) reported providing ad hoc support. Practices agreed that it was the responsibility of both the practice (105/144, 72.9%) and the wider National Health Service (118/143, 82.5%) to support patients in using online services and that providing such support benefited the practice (126/144, 87.5%) and their patients (132/144, 91.7%). Nearly a quarter of the patients (3051/12,822, 23.8%) responded to the patient survey, with few (522/3051, 17.11% or less) reporting awareness of any modes of digital facilitation apart from text messages and emails (1205/3051, 39.5%) and only 13.36% (392/2935) reporting receiving support to use online services. Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that older patients had a lower likelihood of 4 outcomes: being aware of, or of using, digital facilitation efforts, or being told about or being helped to use online services (all P<.05), particularly with regard to being helped to use online services (adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 years versus those aged 55-64 years: 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.36). However, ethnic minority participants or those for whom their first language was not English had positive associations with these outcomes. 

Conclusions: general practices recognize that patients would benefit from support to access online services. However, the support provided is often passive or ad hoc, and patients were seldom aware of digital facilitation efforts that their practice provided. There is potential to increase engagement with online primary care services by providing more support for all patients, particularly to provide targeted support for older patients.

Text
jmir-2024-1-e56528 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (346kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 June 2024
Published date: 7 August 2024
Keywords: Adolescent, Adult, Aged, England, Female, Humans, Internet, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, inequalities, remote consultation, digital support, health services research, access to online health care services, general practice, primary care, survey, digital technology, online services

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493428
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493428
ISSN: 1438-8871
PURE UUID: 8ad58e05-4970-46cb-b73e-6f855ac5d4cd
ORCID for Helen Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2024 16:31
Last modified: 04 Sep 2024 02:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rachel Winder
Author: John L. Campbell
Author: Nurunnahar Akter
Author: Abodunrin Q. Aminu
Author: Jeffrey Lambert
Author: Emma Cockcroft
Author: Chloe Thomas
Author: Christopher E. Clark
Author: Carol Bryce
Author: Jon Sussex
Author: Helen Atherton ORCID iD
Author: Christine Marriott
Author: Gary Abel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×