The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A mixed methods process evaluation: understanding the implementation and delivery of integrating HIV prevention services within sexual reproductive health (SRH) with or without peer support amongst adolescents and young adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

A mixed methods process evaluation: understanding the implementation and delivery of integrating HIV prevention services within sexual reproductive health (SRH) with or without peer support amongst adolescents and young adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
A mixed methods process evaluation: understanding the implementation and delivery of integrating HIV prevention services within sexual reproductive health (SRH) with or without peer support amongst adolescents and young adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Background: combination prevention interventions, when integrated with community-based support, have been shown to be particularly beneficial to adolescent and young peoples’ sexual and reproductive health. Between 2020 and 2022, the Africa Health Research Institute in rural South Africa conducted a 2 × 2 randomised factorial trial among young people aged 16–29 years old (Isisekelo Sempilo) to evaluate whether integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health (HIV/SRH) with or without peer support will optimise delivery of HIV prevention and care. Using mixed methods, we conducted a process evaluation to provide insights to and describe the implementation of a community-based peer-led HIV care and prevention intervention targeting adolescents and young people.

Methods: the process evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Medical Research Council guidelines using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Self-completed surveys and clinic and programmatic data were used to quantify the uptake of each component of the intervention and to understand intervention fidelity and reach. In-depth individual interviews were used to understand intervention experiences. Baseline sociodemographic factors were summarised for each trial arm, and proportions of participants who accepted and actively engaged in various components of the intervention as well as those who successfully linked to care were calculated. Qualitative data were thematically analysed.

Results: the intervention was feasible and acceptable to young people and intervention implementing teams. In particular, the STI testing and SRH components of the intervention were popular. The main challenges with the peer support implementation were due to fidelity, mainly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study found that it was important to incorporate familial support into interventions for young people’s sexual health. Moreover, it was found that psychological and social support was an essential component to combination HIV prevention packages for young people.

Conclusion: the results demonstrated that peer-led community-based care that integrates SRH services with HIV is a versatile model to decentralise health and social care. The family could be a platform to target restrictive gender and sexual norms, by challenging not only attitudes and behaviours related to gender among young people but also the gendered structures that surround them.
1745-6215
Zuma, Thembelihle
6e5dfc5e-d0b9-4a52-be15-fa78a3aa4a53
Busang, Jacob
f6352c2f-ccc2-4db1-8977-d9ded173e633
Hlongwane, Siphesihle
291b7287-6bdd-466e-93bb-c794912e1fe1
Chidumwa, Glory
bda0a64d-e8f6-4fad-bed5-2fd9c86f857f
Gumede, Dumsani
1ba43777-25d1-4f52-a6de-dacebc914ae8
Luthuli, Manono
f6b6d8c4-e814-43f0-ac76-20099eb000ad
Dreyer, Jaco
66cdb4a4-0837-4f68-bcc0-c903f1e10b9b
Herbst, Carina
1e518f7a-15e3-4efc-9a3a-d890ba212f78
Okesola, Nonhlanhla
0a55eb44-591c-4c9f-85a1-bd9268d845fc
Chimbindi, Natsayi
c518d13f-6c0b-4eb2-92f5-89d260eeba87
Mcgrath, Nuala
b75c0232-24ec-443f-93a9-69e9e12dc961
Sherr, Lorraine
dcc07842-49e3-44fc-bf87-d56dd0f15323
Seeley, Janet
d5de9ac7-b54d-4ea5-9098-0c4456974424
Shahmanesh, Maryam
d88581c9-0ef2-4506-b8d3-d72682936a09
Zuma, Thembelihle
6e5dfc5e-d0b9-4a52-be15-fa78a3aa4a53
Busang, Jacob
f6352c2f-ccc2-4db1-8977-d9ded173e633
Hlongwane, Siphesihle
291b7287-6bdd-466e-93bb-c794912e1fe1
Chidumwa, Glory
bda0a64d-e8f6-4fad-bed5-2fd9c86f857f
Gumede, Dumsani
1ba43777-25d1-4f52-a6de-dacebc914ae8
Luthuli, Manono
f6b6d8c4-e814-43f0-ac76-20099eb000ad
Dreyer, Jaco
66cdb4a4-0837-4f68-bcc0-c903f1e10b9b
Herbst, Carina
1e518f7a-15e3-4efc-9a3a-d890ba212f78
Okesola, Nonhlanhla
0a55eb44-591c-4c9f-85a1-bd9268d845fc
Chimbindi, Natsayi
c518d13f-6c0b-4eb2-92f5-89d260eeba87
Mcgrath, Nuala
b75c0232-24ec-443f-93a9-69e9e12dc961
Sherr, Lorraine
dcc07842-49e3-44fc-bf87-d56dd0f15323
Seeley, Janet
d5de9ac7-b54d-4ea5-9098-0c4456974424
Shahmanesh, Maryam
d88581c9-0ef2-4506-b8d3-d72682936a09

Zuma, Thembelihle, Busang, Jacob, Hlongwane, Siphesihle, Chidumwa, Glory, Gumede, Dumsani, Luthuli, Manono, Dreyer, Jaco, Herbst, Carina, Okesola, Nonhlanhla, Chimbindi, Natsayi, Mcgrath, Nuala, Sherr, Lorraine, Seeley, Janet and Shahmanesh, Maryam (2024) A mixed methods process evaluation: understanding the implementation and delivery of integrating HIV prevention services within sexual reproductive health (SRH) with or without peer support amongst adolescents and young adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Trials, 25 (1), [448]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08279-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: combination prevention interventions, when integrated with community-based support, have been shown to be particularly beneficial to adolescent and young peoples’ sexual and reproductive health. Between 2020 and 2022, the Africa Health Research Institute in rural South Africa conducted a 2 × 2 randomised factorial trial among young people aged 16–29 years old (Isisekelo Sempilo) to evaluate whether integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health (HIV/SRH) with or without peer support will optimise delivery of HIV prevention and care. Using mixed methods, we conducted a process evaluation to provide insights to and describe the implementation of a community-based peer-led HIV care and prevention intervention targeting adolescents and young people.

Methods: the process evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Medical Research Council guidelines using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Self-completed surveys and clinic and programmatic data were used to quantify the uptake of each component of the intervention and to understand intervention fidelity and reach. In-depth individual interviews were used to understand intervention experiences. Baseline sociodemographic factors were summarised for each trial arm, and proportions of participants who accepted and actively engaged in various components of the intervention as well as those who successfully linked to care were calculated. Qualitative data were thematically analysed.

Results: the intervention was feasible and acceptable to young people and intervention implementing teams. In particular, the STI testing and SRH components of the intervention were popular. The main challenges with the peer support implementation were due to fidelity, mainly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study found that it was important to incorporate familial support into interventions for young people’s sexual health. Moreover, it was found that psychological and social support was an essential component to combination HIV prevention packages for young people.

Conclusion: the results demonstrated that peer-led community-based care that integrates SRH services with HIV is a versatile model to decentralise health and social care. The family could be a platform to target restrictive gender and sexual norms, by challenging not only attitudes and behaviours related to gender among young people but also the gendered structures that surround them.

Text
s13063-024-08279-3 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 June 2024
Published date: 3 July 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493446
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493446
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: fd6c6db8-e5cf-41c5-9c52-b08e8ab5e520
ORCID for Nuala Mcgrath: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-0159

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2024 16:40
Last modified: 06 Sep 2024 01:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thembelihle Zuma
Author: Jacob Busang
Author: Siphesihle Hlongwane
Author: Glory Chidumwa
Author: Dumsani Gumede
Author: Manono Luthuli
Author: Jaco Dreyer
Author: Carina Herbst
Author: Nonhlanhla Okesola
Author: Natsayi Chimbindi
Author: Nuala Mcgrath ORCID iD
Author: Lorraine Sherr
Author: Janet Seeley
Author: Maryam Shahmanesh

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×