The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Increasing the number of midwives is necessary but not sufficient: using global data to support the case for investment in both midwife availability and the enabling work environment in low- and middle-income countries

Increasing the number of midwives is necessary but not sufficient: using global data to support the case for investment in both midwife availability and the enabling work environment in low- and middle-income countries
Increasing the number of midwives is necessary but not sufficient: using global data to support the case for investment in both midwife availability and the enabling work environment in low- and middle-income countries
Background: most countries are off-track to achieve global maternal and newborn health goals. Global stakeholders agree that investment in midwifery is an important element of the solution. During a global shortage of health workers, strategic decisions must be made about how to configure services to achieve the best possible outcomes with the available resources. This paper aims to assess the relationship between the strength of low- and middle-income countries’ (LMICs’) midwifery profession and key maternal and newborn health outcomes, and thus to prompt policy dialogue about service configuration.

Methods: using the most recent available data from publicly available global databases for the period 2000–2020, we conducted an ecological study to examine the association between the number of midwives per 10,000 population and: (i) maternal mortality, (ii) neonatal mortality, and (iii) caesarean birth rate in LMICs. We developed a composite measure of the strength of the midwifery profession, and examined its relationship with maternal mortality.

Results: in LMICs (especially low-income countries), higher availability of midwives is associated with lower maternal and neonatal mortality. In upper-middle-income countries, higher availability of midwives is associated with caesarean birth rates close to 10–15%. However, some countries achieved good outcomes without increasing midwife availability, and some have increased midwife availability and not achieved good outcomes. Similarly, while stronger midwifery service structures are associated with greater reductions in maternal mortality, this is not true in every country.

Conclusions: a complex web of health system factors and social determinants contribute to maternal and newborn health outcomes, but there is enough evidence from this and other studies to indicate that midwives can be a highly cost-effective element of national strategies to improve these outcomes.
1478-4491
Nove, Andrea
90e094cf-1931-4d79-a8c1-ad04779e61e0
Boyce, Martin
2da3ba68-a566-401a-a71b-ebd5d3ef43b6
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Homer, Caroline
5ca76d03-2b51-427a-aaa2-bd75f8da0b5d
Lavender, Tina
bcae45fe-46b3-4637-8029-41ec065abaee
Matthews, Zoe
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55
Downe, Soo
eff63a3f-ff6b-43ef-82e2-5f406b470abb
Nove, Andrea
90e094cf-1931-4d79-a8c1-ad04779e61e0
Boyce, Martin
2da3ba68-a566-401a-a71b-ebd5d3ef43b6
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Homer, Caroline
5ca76d03-2b51-427a-aaa2-bd75f8da0b5d
Lavender, Tina
bcae45fe-46b3-4637-8029-41ec065abaee
Matthews, Zoe
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55
Downe, Soo
eff63a3f-ff6b-43ef-82e2-5f406b470abb

Nove, Andrea, Boyce, Martin, Neal, Sarah, Homer, Caroline, Lavender, Tina, Matthews, Zoe and Downe, Soo (2024) Increasing the number of midwives is necessary but not sufficient: using global data to support the case for investment in both midwife availability and the enabling work environment in low- and middle-income countries. Human Resources for Health, 22 (1), [54]. (doi:10.1186/s12960-024-00925-w).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: most countries are off-track to achieve global maternal and newborn health goals. Global stakeholders agree that investment in midwifery is an important element of the solution. During a global shortage of health workers, strategic decisions must be made about how to configure services to achieve the best possible outcomes with the available resources. This paper aims to assess the relationship between the strength of low- and middle-income countries’ (LMICs’) midwifery profession and key maternal and newborn health outcomes, and thus to prompt policy dialogue about service configuration.

Methods: using the most recent available data from publicly available global databases for the period 2000–2020, we conducted an ecological study to examine the association between the number of midwives per 10,000 population and: (i) maternal mortality, (ii) neonatal mortality, and (iii) caesarean birth rate in LMICs. We developed a composite measure of the strength of the midwifery profession, and examined its relationship with maternal mortality.

Results: in LMICs (especially low-income countries), higher availability of midwives is associated with lower maternal and neonatal mortality. In upper-middle-income countries, higher availability of midwives is associated with caesarean birth rates close to 10–15%. However, some countries achieved good outcomes without increasing midwife availability, and some have increased midwife availability and not achieved good outcomes. Similarly, while stronger midwifery service structures are associated with greater reductions in maternal mortality, this is not true in every country.

Conclusions: a complex web of health system factors and social determinants contribute to maternal and newborn health outcomes, but there is enough evidence from this and other studies to indicate that midwives can be a highly cost-effective element of national strategies to improve these outcomes.

Text
s12960-024-00925-w - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 May 2024
Published date: 22 July 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493448
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493448
ISSN: 1478-4491
PURE UUID: ab313cca-41b5-4aff-a8de-79dba1fb2216
ORCID for Sarah Neal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-7221
ORCID for Zoe Matthews: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-6618

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2024 16:41
Last modified: 05 Sep 2024 01:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrea Nove
Author: Martin Boyce
Author: Sarah Neal ORCID iD
Author: Caroline Homer
Author: Tina Lavender
Author: Zoe Matthews ORCID iD
Author: Soo Downe

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×