The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition
The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition
How does the visual system recognise stimuli presented at different orientations? According to the multiple-views hypothesis, misoriented objects are matched to one of several orientation-specific representations of the same objects stored in long-term memory. Much of the evidence for this hypothesis comes from the observation of group mean orientation effects in recognition memory tasks showing that the time taken to identify objects increases as a function of the angular distance between the orientation of the stimulus and its nearest familiar orientation. The aim in this paper is to examine the validity of this interpretation of group mean orientation effects. In particular, it is argued that analyses based on group performance averages that appear consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis may, under certain circumstances, obscure a different theoretically relevant underlying pattern of results. This problem is examined by using hypothetical data and through the detailed analysis of the results from an experiment based on a recognition memory task used in several previous studies. Although a pattern of results that is consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis was observed in both the group mean performance and the underlying data, it is argued that the potential limitations of analyses based solely on group performance averages must be considered in future studies that use orientation effects to make inferences about the kinds of shape representations that mediate visual recognition.
803-816
Leek, E. Charles
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
July 1998
Leek, E. Charles
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
Leek, E. Charles
(1998)
The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition.
Perception, 27 (7), .
(doi:10.1068/p270803).
Abstract
How does the visual system recognise stimuli presented at different orientations? According to the multiple-views hypothesis, misoriented objects are matched to one of several orientation-specific representations of the same objects stored in long-term memory. Much of the evidence for this hypothesis comes from the observation of group mean orientation effects in recognition memory tasks showing that the time taken to identify objects increases as a function of the angular distance between the orientation of the stimulus and its nearest familiar orientation. The aim in this paper is to examine the validity of this interpretation of group mean orientation effects. In particular, it is argued that analyses based on group performance averages that appear consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis may, under certain circumstances, obscure a different theoretically relevant underlying pattern of results. This problem is examined by using hypothetical data and through the detailed analysis of the results from an experiment based on a recognition memory task used in several previous studies. Although a pattern of results that is consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis was observed in both the group mean performance and the underlying data, it is argued that the potential limitations of analyses based solely on group performance averages must be considered in future studies that use orientation effects to make inferences about the kinds of shape representations that mediate visual recognition.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: July 1998
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493565
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493565
PURE UUID: 29c4bc03-9721-42a5-a7dd-6b12d8b8951c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Sep 2024 16:35
Last modified: 07 Sep 2024 02:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
E. Charles Leek
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics