The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition

The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition
The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition
How does the visual system recognise stimuli presented at different orientations? According to the multiple-views hypothesis, misoriented objects are matched to one of several orientation-specific representations of the same objects stored in long-term memory. Much of the evidence for this hypothesis comes from the observation of group mean orientation effects in recognition memory tasks showing that the time taken to identify objects increases as a function of the angular distance between the orientation of the stimulus and its nearest familiar orientation. The aim in this paper is to examine the validity of this interpretation of group mean orientation effects. In particular, it is argued that analyses based on group performance averages that appear consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis may, under certain circumstances, obscure a different theoretically relevant underlying pattern of results. This problem is examined by using hypothetical data and through the detailed analysis of the results from an experiment based on a recognition memory task used in several previous studies. Although a pattern of results that is consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis was observed in both the group mean performance and the underlying data, it is argued that the potential limitations of analyses based solely on group performance averages must be considered in future studies that use orientation effects to make inferences about the kinds of shape representations that mediate visual recognition.
803-816
Leek, E. Charles
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
Leek, E. Charles
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88

Leek, E. Charles (1998) The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition. Perception, 27 (7), 803-816. (doi:10.1068/p270803).

Record type: Article

Abstract

How does the visual system recognise stimuli presented at different orientations? According to the multiple-views hypothesis, misoriented objects are matched to one of several orientation-specific representations of the same objects stored in long-term memory. Much of the evidence for this hypothesis comes from the observation of group mean orientation effects in recognition memory tasks showing that the time taken to identify objects increases as a function of the angular distance between the orientation of the stimulus and its nearest familiar orientation. The aim in this paper is to examine the validity of this interpretation of group mean orientation effects. In particular, it is argued that analyses based on group performance averages that appear consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis may, under certain circumstances, obscure a different theoretically relevant underlying pattern of results. This problem is examined by using hypothetical data and through the detailed analysis of the results from an experiment based on a recognition memory task used in several previous studies. Although a pattern of results that is consistent with the multiple-views hypothesis was observed in both the group mean performance and the underlying data, it is argued that the potential limitations of analyses based solely on group performance averages must be considered in future studies that use orientation effects to make inferences about the kinds of shape representations that mediate visual recognition.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 1998

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493565
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493565
PURE UUID: 29c4bc03-9721-42a5-a7dd-6b12d8b8951c
ORCID for E. Charles Leek: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-7504

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2024 16:35
Last modified: 07 Sep 2024 02:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E. Charles Leek ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×