The role of surface-based representations of shape in visual object recognition
The role of surface-based representations of shape in visual object recognition
This study contrasted the role of surfaces and volumetric shape primitives in three-dimensional object recognition. Observers (N = 50) matched subsets of closed contour fragments, surfaces, or volumetric parts to whole novel objects during a whole–part matching task. Three factors were further manipulated: part viewpoint (either same or different between component parts and whole objects), surface occlusion (comparison parts contained either visible surfaces only, or a surface that was fully or partially occluded in the whole object), and target–distractor similarity. Similarity was varied in terms of systematic variation in nonaccidental (NAP) or metric (MP) properties of individual parts. Analysis of sensitivity (d′) showed a whole–part matching advantage for surface-based parts and volumes over closed contour fragments—but no benefit for volumetric parts over surfaces. We also found a performance cost in matching volumetric parts to wholes when the volumes showed surfaces that were occluded in the whole object. The same pattern was found for both same and different viewpoints, and regardless of target–distractor similarity. These findings challenge models in which recognition is mediated by volumetric part-based shape representations. Instead, we argue that the results are consistent with a surface-based model of high-level shape representation for recognition.
2351-2369
Reppa, Irene
82356dae-80dc-4691-94e7-b10f42737a58
Greville, W. James
92209854-9f49-4bcf-a1c1-1f73e9a6c6c4
Leek, E. Charles
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
Reppa, Irene
82356dae-80dc-4691-94e7-b10f42737a58
Greville, W. James
92209854-9f49-4bcf-a1c1-1f73e9a6c6c4
Leek, E. Charles
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
Reppa, Irene, Greville, W. James and Leek, E. Charles
(2015)
The role of surface-based representations of shape in visual object recognition.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68 (12), .
(doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1014379).
Abstract
This study contrasted the role of surfaces and volumetric shape primitives in three-dimensional object recognition. Observers (N = 50) matched subsets of closed contour fragments, surfaces, or volumetric parts to whole novel objects during a whole–part matching task. Three factors were further manipulated: part viewpoint (either same or different between component parts and whole objects), surface occlusion (comparison parts contained either visible surfaces only, or a surface that was fully or partially occluded in the whole object), and target–distractor similarity. Similarity was varied in terms of systematic variation in nonaccidental (NAP) or metric (MP) properties of individual parts. Analysis of sensitivity (d′) showed a whole–part matching advantage for surface-based parts and volumes over closed contour fragments—but no benefit for volumetric parts over surfaces. We also found a performance cost in matching volumetric parts to wholes when the volumes showed surfaces that were occluded in the whole object. The same pattern was found for both same and different viewpoints, and regardless of target–distractor similarity. These findings challenge models in which recognition is mediated by volumetric part-based shape representations. Instead, we argue that the results are consistent with a surface-based model of high-level shape representation for recognition.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 December 2015
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493566
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493566
ISSN: 1747-0218
PURE UUID: 05d16292-08fd-4877-909e-b87f8ae8d77e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Sep 2024 16:37
Last modified: 07 Sep 2024 02:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Irene Reppa
Author:
W. James Greville
Author:
E. Charles Leek
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics