The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Do some patients receive unnecessary parenteral nutrition after pancreatoduodenectomy? Results from an international multicentre study

Do some patients receive unnecessary parenteral nutrition after pancreatoduodenectomy? Results from an international multicentre study
Do some patients receive unnecessary parenteral nutrition after pancreatoduodenectomy? Results from an international multicentre study

Backgrounds/aims: after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), an early oral diet is recommended; however, the postoperative nutritional management of PD patients is known to be highly variable, with some centers still routinely providing parenteral nutrition (PN). Some patients who receive PN experience clinically significant complications, underscoring its judicious use. Using a large cohort, this study aimed to determine the proportion of PD patients who received postoperative nutritional support (NS), describe the nature of this sup-port, and investigate whether receiving PN correlated with adverse perioperative outcomes. 

Methods: data were extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple’s study, a retrospective multicenter study of PD outcomes. 

Results: in total, 1,323 patients (89%) had data on their postoperative NS status available. Of these, 45% received postoperative NS, which was “enteral only,” “parenteral only,” and “enteral and parenteral” in 44%, 35%, and 21% of cases, respectively. Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m 2 (p = 0.03), absence of preoperative biliary stenting (p = 0.009), and serum albumin < 36 g/L (p = 0.009) all correlated with receiving postoperative NS. Among those who did not develop a serious postoperative complication, i.e., those who had a relatively uneventful recovery, 20% received PN. 

Conclusions: a considerable number of patients who had an uneventful recovery received PN. PN is not without risk, and should be reserved for those who are unable to take an oral diet. PD patients should undergo pre-and postoperative assessment by nutrition pro-fessionals to ensure they are managed appropriately, and to optimize perioperative outcomes.

Nutritional status, Nutritional support, Nutritionists, Pancreatic ductal carcinoma, Pancreaticoduodenectomy
2508-5859
70-79
Russell, Thomas B.
aa38ef73-d1cb-4634-8bff-10293799eb3e
Labib, Peter L.
baaaf73b-71b2-497e-be55-a3a14f2cda83
Murphy, Paula
f2b5db76-1480-4179-87a6-e38bfb2d4b07
Ausania, Fabio
4bdee26f-efe8-485f-a24e-e335ddc73e49
Pando, Elizabeth
a99d3d9a-807e-4bda-881c-f4a908c7d991
Roberts, Keith J.
a74b19fc-0509-435a-9292-e213931cf734
Kausar, Ambareen
efa1f2b3-42c5-4190-a84e-59417bdd4a11
Mavroeidis, Vasileios K.
7e1d9bd5-4239-4091-9cdc-7871e8e57b72
Marangoni, Gabriele
b876a178-8129-4455-adcf-1f8b04428c2a
Thomasset, Sarah C.
b26051a1-0715-4b20-8b02-eb5a27e7a63c
Frampton, Adam E.
d5cf9723-91a0-43f2-9ad2-cfd669eefcb5
Lykoudis, Pavlos
bc705761-0eca-4ad3-bc38-359f13760d41
Maglione, Manuel
a996a90b-4a3b-42d6-b24d-4c9daad8f1bd
Alhaboob, Nassir
625d17d8-953d-460f-a827-5109de3191ad
Bari, Hassaan
5d9062e2-e0b3-43b7-bf28-46a5a7e7ea33
Smith, Andrew M.
f719dbf6-612c-4ecb-9ec8-ae0ac74928eb
Spalding, Duncan
df47f2b3-5b70-465b-a43a-4d6cc5b5e35a
Srinivasan, Parthi
400175cf-a18b-4725-bdc6-6e15868b82c0
Davidson, Brian R.
ad35b9bb-d75b-4414-8eb9-d73b77313ed6
Bhogal, Ricky H.
0e670132-dbd5-49ae-99ec-8c4985d7febb
Croagh, Daniel
38094310-91f6-4939-b2bb-f9742df56dea
Dominguez, Ismael
f08b0ece-043b-416a-9d87-a9cff47c0eb4
Thakkar, Rohan
81b74d0d-0a17-40f4-99b6-f54fe237aef1
Gomez, Dhanny
7330d00c-af63-46f7-8797-c7e0ac57ca2c
Silva, Michael A.
6ddfe6d5-9fe9-4729-a0e0-e8cb79af6b7d
Lapolla, Pierfrancesco
90d8864e-3b8f-4fd5-94c6-119828c6750f
Mingoli, Andrea
5c3a7f75-05b3-4674-bf0d-a34b51601164
Porcu, Alberto
91af0f20-480d-47be-bd85-a48801ee020b
Shah, Nehal S.
d31d2103-06c5-42b0-b743-d9f8cccf30da
Hamady, Zaed Z.R.
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Al-Sarrieh, Bilal
058e55cf-9996-46e0-a923-cdd55d2f0a77
Serrablo, Alejandro
8647c43c-eb2a-4cdb-9312-4ad66e267848
Aroori, Somaiah
842a95b8-42fb-462d-85a7-faeefd6ecea0
RAW Study Collaborators
Russell, Thomas B.
aa38ef73-d1cb-4634-8bff-10293799eb3e
Labib, Peter L.
baaaf73b-71b2-497e-be55-a3a14f2cda83
Murphy, Paula
f2b5db76-1480-4179-87a6-e38bfb2d4b07
Ausania, Fabio
4bdee26f-efe8-485f-a24e-e335ddc73e49
Pando, Elizabeth
a99d3d9a-807e-4bda-881c-f4a908c7d991
Roberts, Keith J.
a74b19fc-0509-435a-9292-e213931cf734
Kausar, Ambareen
efa1f2b3-42c5-4190-a84e-59417bdd4a11
Mavroeidis, Vasileios K.
7e1d9bd5-4239-4091-9cdc-7871e8e57b72
Marangoni, Gabriele
b876a178-8129-4455-adcf-1f8b04428c2a
Thomasset, Sarah C.
b26051a1-0715-4b20-8b02-eb5a27e7a63c
Frampton, Adam E.
d5cf9723-91a0-43f2-9ad2-cfd669eefcb5
Lykoudis, Pavlos
bc705761-0eca-4ad3-bc38-359f13760d41
Maglione, Manuel
a996a90b-4a3b-42d6-b24d-4c9daad8f1bd
Alhaboob, Nassir
625d17d8-953d-460f-a827-5109de3191ad
Bari, Hassaan
5d9062e2-e0b3-43b7-bf28-46a5a7e7ea33
Smith, Andrew M.
f719dbf6-612c-4ecb-9ec8-ae0ac74928eb
Spalding, Duncan
df47f2b3-5b70-465b-a43a-4d6cc5b5e35a
Srinivasan, Parthi
400175cf-a18b-4725-bdc6-6e15868b82c0
Davidson, Brian R.
ad35b9bb-d75b-4414-8eb9-d73b77313ed6
Bhogal, Ricky H.
0e670132-dbd5-49ae-99ec-8c4985d7febb
Croagh, Daniel
38094310-91f6-4939-b2bb-f9742df56dea
Dominguez, Ismael
f08b0ece-043b-416a-9d87-a9cff47c0eb4
Thakkar, Rohan
81b74d0d-0a17-40f4-99b6-f54fe237aef1
Gomez, Dhanny
7330d00c-af63-46f7-8797-c7e0ac57ca2c
Silva, Michael A.
6ddfe6d5-9fe9-4729-a0e0-e8cb79af6b7d
Lapolla, Pierfrancesco
90d8864e-3b8f-4fd5-94c6-119828c6750f
Mingoli, Andrea
5c3a7f75-05b3-4674-bf0d-a34b51601164
Porcu, Alberto
91af0f20-480d-47be-bd85-a48801ee020b
Shah, Nehal S.
d31d2103-06c5-42b0-b743-d9f8cccf30da
Hamady, Zaed Z.R.
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Al-Sarrieh, Bilal
058e55cf-9996-46e0-a923-cdd55d2f0a77
Serrablo, Alejandro
8647c43c-eb2a-4cdb-9312-4ad66e267848
Aroori, Somaiah
842a95b8-42fb-462d-85a7-faeefd6ecea0

Russell, Thomas B., Labib, Peter L. and Murphy, Paula , RAW Study Collaborators (2024) Do some patients receive unnecessary parenteral nutrition after pancreatoduodenectomy? Results from an international multicentre study. Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 28 (1), 70-79. (doi:10.14701/ahbps.23-071).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), an early oral diet is recommended; however, the postoperative nutritional management of PD patients is known to be highly variable, with some centers still routinely providing parenteral nutrition (PN). Some patients who receive PN experience clinically significant complications, underscoring its judicious use. Using a large cohort, this study aimed to determine the proportion of PD patients who received postoperative nutritional support (NS), describe the nature of this sup-port, and investigate whether receiving PN correlated with adverse perioperative outcomes. 

Methods: data were extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple’s study, a retrospective multicenter study of PD outcomes. 

Results: in total, 1,323 patients (89%) had data on their postoperative NS status available. Of these, 45% received postoperative NS, which was “enteral only,” “parenteral only,” and “enteral and parenteral” in 44%, 35%, and 21% of cases, respectively. Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m 2 (p = 0.03), absence of preoperative biliary stenting (p = 0.009), and serum albumin < 36 g/L (p = 0.009) all correlated with receiving postoperative NS. Among those who did not develop a serious postoperative complication, i.e., those who had a relatively uneventful recovery, 20% received PN. 

Conclusions: a considerable number of patients who had an uneventful recovery received PN. PN is not without risk, and should be reserved for those who are unable to take an oral diet. PD patients should undergo pre-and postoperative assessment by nutrition pro-fessionals to ensure they are managed appropriately, and to optimize perioperative outcomes.

Text
ahbps-28-1-70 - Version of Record
Download (615kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 July 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 February 2024
Keywords: Nutritional status, Nutritional support, Nutritionists, Pancreatic ductal carcinoma, Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493569
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493569
ISSN: 2508-5859
PURE UUID: a5388459-33e8-4e4a-8dc4-c117bd103731
ORCID for Andrew M. Smith: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7321-4331
ORCID for Zaed Z.R. Hamady: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-5226

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2024 16:39
Last modified: 07 Sep 2024 02:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas B. Russell
Author: Peter L. Labib
Author: Paula Murphy
Author: Fabio Ausania
Author: Elizabeth Pando
Author: Keith J. Roberts
Author: Ambareen Kausar
Author: Vasileios K. Mavroeidis
Author: Gabriele Marangoni
Author: Sarah C. Thomasset
Author: Adam E. Frampton
Author: Pavlos Lykoudis
Author: Manuel Maglione
Author: Nassir Alhaboob
Author: Hassaan Bari
Author: Andrew M. Smith ORCID iD
Author: Duncan Spalding
Author: Parthi Srinivasan
Author: Brian R. Davidson
Author: Ricky H. Bhogal
Author: Daniel Croagh
Author: Ismael Dominguez
Author: Rohan Thakkar
Author: Dhanny Gomez
Author: Michael A. Silva
Author: Pierfrancesco Lapolla
Author: Andrea Mingoli
Author: Alberto Porcu
Author: Nehal S. Shah
Author: Zaed Z.R. Hamady ORCID iD
Author: Bilal Al-Sarrieh
Author: Alejandro Serrablo
Author: Somaiah Aroori
Corporate Author: RAW Study Collaborators

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×