Believability in mathematical conditionals: generating items for a conditional inference task
Believability in mathematical conditionals: generating items for a conditional inference task
This paper describes design issues for a conditional inference task with mathematical content. The task will mirror those used in cognitive psychology to study inferences from everyday causal conditionals: its items will present a conditional premise (if A then B) and a categorical premise (A, not-A, B, or not-B) and ask participants to evaluate whether a conclusion (respectively, B, not-B, A, not-A) necessarily follows. To assemble items, we asked six mathematics education researchers with expertise in conceptual understanding to generate conditionals covering a range of mathematical topics. To mirror the structure of tasks with everyday causal content, we asked that these conditionals should vary in believability. In this paper, we analyze the content and phrasing of the submitted conditionals in order to assess their suitability for use in a conditional inference task, and describe our planned use of this task to investigate the relationship between logical reasoning and mathematical expertise.
Alcock, Lara
f4c0d07f-0fde-4a10-b893-28b49c980613
Davies, Ben
aa12efcd-c8a4-4abc-9f2a-469afaff2770
8 January 2024
Alcock, Lara
f4c0d07f-0fde-4a10-b893-28b49c980613
Davies, Ben
aa12efcd-c8a4-4abc-9f2a-469afaff2770
Alcock, Lara and Davies, Ben
(2024)
Believability in mathematical conditionals: generating items for a conditional inference task.
In Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
This paper describes design issues for a conditional inference task with mathematical content. The task will mirror those used in cognitive psychology to study inferences from everyday causal conditionals: its items will present a conditional premise (if A then B) and a categorical premise (A, not-A, B, or not-B) and ask participants to evaluate whether a conclusion (respectively, B, not-B, A, not-A) necessarily follows. To assemble items, we asked six mathematics education researchers with expertise in conceptual understanding to generate conditionals covering a range of mathematical topics. To mirror the structure of tasks with everyday causal content, we asked that these conditionals should vary in believability. In this paper, we analyze the content and phrasing of the submitted conditionals in order to assess their suitability for use in a conditional inference task, and describe our planned use of this task to investigate the relationship between logical reasoning and mathematical expertise.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 8 January 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493617
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493617
ISSN: 2474-9346
PURE UUID: 261b5da8-d4ef-4607-b986-e9c0ca9385ba
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2024 16:49
Last modified: 10 Sep 2024 02:05
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Lara Alcock
Author:
Ben Davies
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics