The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

WILL (when to induce labour to limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic

WILL (when to induce labour to limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
WILL (when to induce labour to limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic

Background: as a pragmatic randomised timing-of-birth trial, WILL adapted its trial procedures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are reviewed here to inform post-pandemic trial methodology. 

Methods: the trial (internal pilot) paused in March 2020, re-opened in July 2020, and is currently recruiting in 37 UK NHS consultant-led maternity units. We evaluated pandemic adaptations made to WILL processes and surveyed sites for their views of these changes (20 sites, videoconference). 

Results: despite 88% of sites favouring an electronic investigator site file (ISF), information technology requirements and clinical trial unit (CTU) operating procedures mandated the ongoing use of paper ISFs; site start-up delays resulted from restricted access to the CTU. Site initiation visits (SIVs) were conducted remotely; 50% of sites preferred remote SIVs and 44% felt that it was trial-dependent, while few preferred SIVs in-person as standard procedure. The Central team felt remote SIVs provided scheduling and attendance flexibility (for sites and trial staff), the option of recording discussions for missing or future staff, improved efficiency by having multiple sites attend, and time and cost savings; the negative impact on rapport-building and interaction was partially mitigated over time with more familiarity with technology and new ways-of-working. Two methods of remote consent were developed and used by 30/37 sites and for 54/156 recruits. Most (86%) sites using remote consenting felt it improved recruitment. For remote data monitoring (5 sites), advantages were primarily for the monitor (e.g. flexibility, no time constraints, reduced cost), and disadvantages primarily for the sites (e.g. document and access preparation, attendance at a follow-up meeting), but 81% of sites desired having the option of remote monitoring post-pandemic. 

Conclusions: COVID adaptations to WILL trial processes improved the flexibility of trial delivery, for Central and site staff, and participants. Flexibility to use these strategies should be retained post-pandemic. 

Trial registration: ISRCTN77258279. Registered on 05 December 2018.

COVID, Pregnancy, Remote consent, Timing of birth, Trial management
1745-6215
Magee, Laura A.
12dc7d1f-b93a-421f-8f47-46e436e5cc30
Tohill, Sue
a8ecd092-0392-4c0f-a460-0f28e2439f89
Kirkham, Katie
08d797cc-7844-49a6-9d7d-a92ebc7179cc
Evans, Ruth
94e58a97-c1df-4339-add1-b8d23aa70e61
Gkini, Eleni
0c6897c3-1aa2-4335-aa38-ef462dc9aedb
Moakes, Catherine A.
eedafd90-5006-47ed-9c9a-0e33f2949e1e
Stubbs, Clive
03d81c31-fd9f-407f-bec8-ebdc5821d2ec
Thornton, Jim
9edbe61e-ce9e-4f02-9536-cedeb0257bf9
von Dadelszen, Peter
1e93eb1e-6552-415a-9e58-9a60bd596610
Brocklehurst, Peter
f1b7dd3f-7165-4b14-a6f6-2bb62521a990
Chappell, Lucy
43bf7847-01bc-4c93-a8b1-a63f18f3a51e
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Green, Marcus
2f551828-eb98-4475-835f-8d24243deccf
Hardy, Pollyanna
18af6583-b45e-44e1-90cd-a0bfd2e8d686
Hutcheon, Jennifer
3a181486-aa3e-4bb6-9071-483728457614
Moakes, Catherine
eedafd90-5006-47ed-9c9a-0e33f2949e1e
Mol, Ben W.
0f9e2d15-dd3b-43cb-915c-9336d05cae0f
Morris, Katie
32342907-8b68-4908-82fc-8c0bd1012dc7
Riley, Paul
8849c186-4128-4da3-aff1-9ab6287b8acf
Roberts, Tracy
ace98789-7fc3-45f9-b2ed-1969222f32fd
Scott, Janet
1802059f-9dba-47f4-af37-2a08dfea4232
Singer, Joel
0d909cb1-3062-46e1-93e8-258214dfac18
Unstead-Joss, Ruth
7f69e35b-90e1-48a8-85bf-d87d0234f374
Wade, Julie
c868ad51-2595-43ab-b304-aa7c499e25b7
Draycott, Tim
18f3fba9-8d0f-4b98-9ffa-30506f1d7c9f
MacLennan, Graeme
209593f8-0b7c-44fd-9abc-c1ea575b6c61
MacKillop, Lucy
3856f017-2ade-467d-b2be-3c6b141c7312
Mannix, Paul
bd789717-93f9-45be-b52e-05af3672d188
Elbourne, Diana
4b024777-aea8-4bfb-a74a-c705a6aace1c
Groen, Henk
43387c93-45ca-4ca8-82ca-980dff7c1533
Murdoch, Edile
6fffe2f2-3535-4a80-95ef-201d16f7c67a
Stock, Sarah
e853179b-67bb-4db8-9318-80e46b4a3146
Bhuiya, Sumita
3426da06-7632-4ca9-9f91-4f6a492c9d43
Nallapeta, Soumendra
1c8be943-e363-46e5-98b2-85c51112e51c
Dooks, Emma
7109d167-3029-49d0-bc6d-e11d0426ae9d
Packham, Sophie
a5709488-0905-46ca-a87d-cda09ce9352a
Whitehouse, Diane
a2103a3d-47da-4d36-97a3-309c6d8364c4
O’Hara, Chloe
973dcf7d-a767-4a0f-a91e-ab79663c2e71
Weston, Connie
20457a9d-44da-4be4-9e89-49102d4637c5
Mellers, Diane
edfe03ec-da15-4413-bb1d-661b03834ff7
Brittain, Lesley
a7662da3-812c-4d1d-9544-df930f83c13b
Adams, Phern
cd12b1b5-b449-4e59-9cb3-743fb3344dc7
Shakespeare, Rebecca
e969ea0a-1283-4c57-8932-d807015872f8
Kakara, Sudeepthi
0bfae3d7-75ee-4f53-8e37-c86d98d3c44f
Wright, Janet
705fdcad-22b3-4464-9f3b-aac149bfb67f
Mighell, Amal
83102ec0-02f0-4fd5-95ed-b07a7035d6e4
Syson, Jennifer
2ef71342-7e5c-43ac-94fd-d69433752859
Swettenham, Kari
858a73fc-2520-4b2e-99c5-c2e890faee1e
Eedle, Jenny
51ee12bf-63c9-42ce-b1a7-ebbf4fa166bd
Seraj, Shaila
305992de-26c4-4f9a-a3a7-d8f11b4c4c64
the WILL Trial Study Group
Magee, Laura A.
12dc7d1f-b93a-421f-8f47-46e436e5cc30
Tohill, Sue
a8ecd092-0392-4c0f-a460-0f28e2439f89
Kirkham, Katie
08d797cc-7844-49a6-9d7d-a92ebc7179cc
Evans, Ruth
94e58a97-c1df-4339-add1-b8d23aa70e61
Gkini, Eleni
0c6897c3-1aa2-4335-aa38-ef462dc9aedb
Moakes, Catherine A.
eedafd90-5006-47ed-9c9a-0e33f2949e1e
Stubbs, Clive
03d81c31-fd9f-407f-bec8-ebdc5821d2ec
Thornton, Jim
9edbe61e-ce9e-4f02-9536-cedeb0257bf9
von Dadelszen, Peter
1e93eb1e-6552-415a-9e58-9a60bd596610
Brocklehurst, Peter
f1b7dd3f-7165-4b14-a6f6-2bb62521a990
Chappell, Lucy
43bf7847-01bc-4c93-a8b1-a63f18f3a51e
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Green, Marcus
2f551828-eb98-4475-835f-8d24243deccf
Hardy, Pollyanna
18af6583-b45e-44e1-90cd-a0bfd2e8d686
Hutcheon, Jennifer
3a181486-aa3e-4bb6-9071-483728457614
Moakes, Catherine
eedafd90-5006-47ed-9c9a-0e33f2949e1e
Mol, Ben W.
0f9e2d15-dd3b-43cb-915c-9336d05cae0f
Morris, Katie
32342907-8b68-4908-82fc-8c0bd1012dc7
Riley, Paul
8849c186-4128-4da3-aff1-9ab6287b8acf
Roberts, Tracy
ace98789-7fc3-45f9-b2ed-1969222f32fd
Scott, Janet
1802059f-9dba-47f4-af37-2a08dfea4232
Singer, Joel
0d909cb1-3062-46e1-93e8-258214dfac18
Unstead-Joss, Ruth
7f69e35b-90e1-48a8-85bf-d87d0234f374
Wade, Julie
c868ad51-2595-43ab-b304-aa7c499e25b7
Draycott, Tim
18f3fba9-8d0f-4b98-9ffa-30506f1d7c9f
MacLennan, Graeme
209593f8-0b7c-44fd-9abc-c1ea575b6c61
MacKillop, Lucy
3856f017-2ade-467d-b2be-3c6b141c7312
Mannix, Paul
bd789717-93f9-45be-b52e-05af3672d188
Elbourne, Diana
4b024777-aea8-4bfb-a74a-c705a6aace1c
Groen, Henk
43387c93-45ca-4ca8-82ca-980dff7c1533
Murdoch, Edile
6fffe2f2-3535-4a80-95ef-201d16f7c67a
Stock, Sarah
e853179b-67bb-4db8-9318-80e46b4a3146
Bhuiya, Sumita
3426da06-7632-4ca9-9f91-4f6a492c9d43
Nallapeta, Soumendra
1c8be943-e363-46e5-98b2-85c51112e51c
Dooks, Emma
7109d167-3029-49d0-bc6d-e11d0426ae9d
Packham, Sophie
a5709488-0905-46ca-a87d-cda09ce9352a
Whitehouse, Diane
a2103a3d-47da-4d36-97a3-309c6d8364c4
O’Hara, Chloe
973dcf7d-a767-4a0f-a91e-ab79663c2e71
Weston, Connie
20457a9d-44da-4be4-9e89-49102d4637c5
Mellers, Diane
edfe03ec-da15-4413-bb1d-661b03834ff7
Brittain, Lesley
a7662da3-812c-4d1d-9544-df930f83c13b
Adams, Phern
cd12b1b5-b449-4e59-9cb3-743fb3344dc7
Shakespeare, Rebecca
e969ea0a-1283-4c57-8932-d807015872f8
Kakara, Sudeepthi
0bfae3d7-75ee-4f53-8e37-c86d98d3c44f
Wright, Janet
705fdcad-22b3-4464-9f3b-aac149bfb67f
Mighell, Amal
83102ec0-02f0-4fd5-95ed-b07a7035d6e4
Syson, Jennifer
2ef71342-7e5c-43ac-94fd-d69433752859
Swettenham, Kari
858a73fc-2520-4b2e-99c5-c2e890faee1e
Eedle, Jenny
51ee12bf-63c9-42ce-b1a7-ebbf4fa166bd
Seraj, Shaila
305992de-26c4-4f9a-a3a7-d8f11b4c4c64

Magee, Laura A., Tohill, Sue, Kirkham, Katie, Evans, Ruth, Gkini, Eleni, Moakes, Catherine A., Stubbs, Clive and von Dadelszen, Peter , the WILL Trial Study Group (2022) WILL (when to induce labour to limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic. Trials, 23 (1), [884]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06834-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: as a pragmatic randomised timing-of-birth trial, WILL adapted its trial procedures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are reviewed here to inform post-pandemic trial methodology. 

Methods: the trial (internal pilot) paused in March 2020, re-opened in July 2020, and is currently recruiting in 37 UK NHS consultant-led maternity units. We evaluated pandemic adaptations made to WILL processes and surveyed sites for their views of these changes (20 sites, videoconference). 

Results: despite 88% of sites favouring an electronic investigator site file (ISF), information technology requirements and clinical trial unit (CTU) operating procedures mandated the ongoing use of paper ISFs; site start-up delays resulted from restricted access to the CTU. Site initiation visits (SIVs) were conducted remotely; 50% of sites preferred remote SIVs and 44% felt that it was trial-dependent, while few preferred SIVs in-person as standard procedure. The Central team felt remote SIVs provided scheduling and attendance flexibility (for sites and trial staff), the option of recording discussions for missing or future staff, improved efficiency by having multiple sites attend, and time and cost savings; the negative impact on rapport-building and interaction was partially mitigated over time with more familiarity with technology and new ways-of-working. Two methods of remote consent were developed and used by 30/37 sites and for 54/156 recruits. Most (86%) sites using remote consenting felt it improved recruitment. For remote data monitoring (5 sites), advantages were primarily for the monitor (e.g. flexibility, no time constraints, reduced cost), and disadvantages primarily for the sites (e.g. document and access preparation, attendance at a follow-up meeting), but 81% of sites desired having the option of remote monitoring post-pandemic. 

Conclusions: COVID adaptations to WILL trial processes improved the flexibility of trial delivery, for Central and site staff, and participants. Flexibility to use these strategies should be retained post-pandemic. 

Trial registration: ISRCTN77258279. Registered on 05 December 2018.

Text
s13063-022-06834-4 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 September 2022
Published date: 21 October 2022
Keywords: COVID, Pregnancy, Remote consent, Timing of birth, Trial management

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493628
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493628
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 26ce8532-0ec6-4670-a2d5-4f5c33d0437e
ORCID for Jon Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2024 16:56
Last modified: 10 Sep 2024 02:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Laura A. Magee
Author: Sue Tohill
Author: Katie Kirkham
Author: Ruth Evans
Author: Eleni Gkini
Author: Catherine A. Moakes
Author: Clive Stubbs
Author: Jim Thornton
Author: Peter von Dadelszen
Author: Peter Brocklehurst
Author: Lucy Chappell
Author: Jon Dorling ORCID iD
Author: Marcus Green
Author: Pollyanna Hardy
Author: Jennifer Hutcheon
Author: Catherine Moakes
Author: Ben W. Mol
Author: Katie Morris
Author: Paul Riley
Author: Tracy Roberts
Author: Janet Scott
Author: Joel Singer
Author: Ruth Unstead-Joss
Author: Julie Wade
Author: Tim Draycott
Author: Graeme MacLennan
Author: Lucy MacKillop
Author: Paul Mannix
Author: Diana Elbourne
Author: Henk Groen
Author: Edile Murdoch
Author: Sarah Stock
Author: Sumita Bhuiya
Author: Soumendra Nallapeta
Author: Emma Dooks
Author: Sophie Packham
Author: Diane Whitehouse
Author: Chloe O’Hara
Author: Connie Weston
Author: Diane Mellers
Author: Lesley Brittain
Author: Phern Adams
Author: Rebecca Shakespeare
Author: Sudeepthi Kakara
Author: Janet Wright
Author: Amal Mighell
Author: Jennifer Syson
Author: Kari Swettenham
Author: Jenny Eedle
Author: Shaila Seraj
Corporate Author: the WILL Trial Study Group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×