The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A prospective population-based study of birth at 32-36 weeks of gestation: neonatal outcomes from the Late and Moderate Preterm Birth Study (LAMBS)

A prospective population-based study of birth at 32-36 weeks of gestation: neonatal outcomes from the Late and Moderate Preterm Birth Study (LAMBS)
A prospective population-based study of birth at 32-36 weeks of gestation: neonatal outcomes from the Late and Moderate Preterm Birth Study (LAMBS)
Background: although late and moderate prematurity (32-36 weeks' gestation) represents 75% of preterm births, research in these infants is sparse. However, data from small or retrospective studies consistently suggest they are at greater risk of adverse outcomes than previously recognised.

Aim: a prospective population-based study of outcomes of infants born at 32-36 weeks' gestation.

Methods: all mothers and their babies delivering at 32-36 weeks were invited to participate, together with a random sample of infants born at ≥37 weeks. Mothers were interviewed and obstetric and neonatal records were reviewed.

Results: preliminary data analysis for 728 preterm and 782 term live-born singleton infants recruited between September 2009 and September 2010 revealed that neonatal outcomes for preterm infants were significantly worse than those of term born infants (Table 1).

Conclusions: births at 32-36 weeks far outnumber those below 32 weeks. The overall impact of adverse outcomes in these children is therefore likely to be greater than that of the most immature infants. This has implications for health services planning and resource allocation.
0031-3998
Boyle, E.M.
0a18aac0-3ba2-4463-a07c-f5957ed4ceb7
Johnson, S.
1818c058-8233-479b-a6cd-57908b2ee48c
Draper, E.S.
05ffcfa5-d7a6-4324-a5da-9387b6b7ca0b
Manktelow, B.
f8184e07-568f-48d6-9bce-c98aeca31e56
Seaton, S.
ac7a38b8-8612-48a2-ad41-cab4326f8810
Dorling, J.
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Smith, L.K.
8f1d7993-05ca-4bb7-86fd-b3ab119bfc20
Marlow, N.
f119cba2-1811-4906-a2d7-474e1da2c043
Field, D.
5fb7e502-f9a1-48da-8db4-220b63246a07
Boyle, E.M.
0a18aac0-3ba2-4463-a07c-f5957ed4ceb7
Johnson, S.
1818c058-8233-479b-a6cd-57908b2ee48c
Draper, E.S.
05ffcfa5-d7a6-4324-a5da-9387b6b7ca0b
Manktelow, B.
f8184e07-568f-48d6-9bce-c98aeca31e56
Seaton, S.
ac7a38b8-8612-48a2-ad41-cab4326f8810
Dorling, J.
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Smith, L.K.
8f1d7993-05ca-4bb7-86fd-b3ab119bfc20
Marlow, N.
f119cba2-1811-4906-a2d7-474e1da2c043
Field, D.
5fb7e502-f9a1-48da-8db4-220b63246a07

Boyle, E.M., Johnson, S., Draper, E.S., Manktelow, B., Seaton, S., Dorling, J., Smith, L.K., Marlow, N. and Field, D. (2011) A prospective population-based study of birth at 32-36 weeks of gestation: neonatal outcomes from the Late and Moderate Preterm Birth Study (LAMBS). Pediatric Research, 70 (Suppl. 5), [304]. (doi:10.1038/PR.2011.529).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: although late and moderate prematurity (32-36 weeks' gestation) represents 75% of preterm births, research in these infants is sparse. However, data from small or retrospective studies consistently suggest they are at greater risk of adverse outcomes than previously recognised.

Aim: a prospective population-based study of outcomes of infants born at 32-36 weeks' gestation.

Methods: all mothers and their babies delivering at 32-36 weeks were invited to participate, together with a random sample of infants born at ≥37 weeks. Mothers were interviewed and obstetric and neonatal records were reviewed.

Results: preliminary data analysis for 728 preterm and 782 term live-born singleton infants recruited between September 2009 and September 2010 revealed that neonatal outcomes for preterm infants were significantly worse than those of term born infants (Table 1).

Conclusions: births at 32-36 weeks far outnumber those below 32 weeks. The overall impact of adverse outcomes in these children is therefore likely to be greater than that of the most immature infants. This has implications for health services planning and resource allocation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2011

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493635
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493635
ISSN: 0031-3998
PURE UUID: 400ec083-b89f-485e-9c32-05ea4761d8bd
ORCID for J. Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Sep 2024 16:30
Last modified: 11 Sep 2024 02:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E.M. Boyle
Author: S. Johnson
Author: E.S. Draper
Author: B. Manktelow
Author: S. Seaton
Author: J. Dorling ORCID iD
Author: L.K. Smith
Author: N. Marlow
Author: D. Field

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×