The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

RNA-sequencing first approach generates new diagnostic candidates in Mendelian disorders

RNA-sequencing first approach generates new diagnostic candidates in Mendelian disorders
RNA-sequencing first approach generates new diagnostic candidates in Mendelian disorders
Background: RNA-sequencing is increasingly being used as a complementary tool to DNA sequencing in diagnostics where DNA analysis has been uninformative. RNA-sequencing allows us to identify alternative splicing and aberrant gene expression allowing for improved interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS). Additionally, RNA-sequencing provides the opportunity not only to look at the splicing effects of known VUSs but also to scan the transcriptome for abnormal splicing events and expression abnormalities in other relevant genes that may be the cause of a patient’s phenotype.

Methods: using RNA from patient blood, we have systematically assessed transcriptomic profiles of 87 patients with suspected Mendelian disorders, 38% of which did not have a candidate sequence variant. Cases with VUSs and known events were assessed first followed by assessment of cases with no VUS. Each VUS was visually inspected using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) to search for splicing abnormalities. Once aberrant splicing was identified in cases with VUS, multiple open-source alternative splicing tools (MAJIQ, rMATS-turbo, FRASER2 and LeafCutterMD) were used to investigate if they would identify what was observed in IGV. Expression outliers were detected using OUTRIDER. To find diagnoses in cases without a VUS or gene of interest, two separate strategies were used. The first was a genotype to phenotype approach using variant calls obtained from the RNA-sequencing and overlapping those calls with results from splicing tools. The second strategy involved using phenotype information available to filter results from splicing tools.

Results: using RNA-sequencing only, we were able to assess 71% of VUSs and detect aberrant splicing in 14/48 patients with a VUS. Furthermore, we identified four new diagnoses by detecting novel aberrant splicing events in patients with no candidate sequence variants from prior genomic DNA testing (n=33) or those in which the candidate VUS did not affect splicing (n=23) and identified one additional diagnosis through detection of skewed X-inactivation.

Conclusion: we demonstrate the identification of novel diagnoses using an RNA-sequencing first approach in patients without candidate VUSs. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of blood-based RNA analysis in improving diagnostic yields and highlight optimal approaches for such analysis.
Oquendo, Carolina Jaramillo
7ac6cb48-5df8-4d22-9907-46dc8f4d4b18
Wai, Htoo A
4428517b-33b3-42cb-9818-ca64763ab7bc
Rich, Will
1e89cff1-fe2c-4308-a997-92f92f3d4007
Bunyan, David J.
dd9134b9-f889-44cc-83cc-a41fc5d74d69
Thomas, N. Simon
1a601957-288d-4f12-a9f7-4f4279b7f9b3
Hunt, David
5867549e-0e44-4f07-9a42-93aaf092fd4d
Lord, Jenny
e1909780-36cd-4705-b21e-4580038d4ec6
Douglas, Andrew G.L.
2c789ec4-a222-43bc-a040-522ca64fea42
Baralle, Diana
faac16e5-7928-4801-9811-8b3a9ea4bb91
Oquendo, Carolina Jaramillo
7ac6cb48-5df8-4d22-9907-46dc8f4d4b18
Wai, Htoo A
4428517b-33b3-42cb-9818-ca64763ab7bc
Rich, Will
1e89cff1-fe2c-4308-a997-92f92f3d4007
Bunyan, David J.
dd9134b9-f889-44cc-83cc-a41fc5d74d69
Thomas, N. Simon
1a601957-288d-4f12-a9f7-4f4279b7f9b3
Hunt, David
5867549e-0e44-4f07-9a42-93aaf092fd4d
Lord, Jenny
e1909780-36cd-4705-b21e-4580038d4ec6
Douglas, Andrew G.L.
2c789ec4-a222-43bc-a040-522ca64fea42
Baralle, Diana
faac16e5-7928-4801-9811-8b3a9ea4bb91

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Background: RNA-sequencing is increasingly being used as a complementary tool to DNA sequencing in diagnostics where DNA analysis has been uninformative. RNA-sequencing allows us to identify alternative splicing and aberrant gene expression allowing for improved interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS). Additionally, RNA-sequencing provides the opportunity not only to look at the splicing effects of known VUSs but also to scan the transcriptome for abnormal splicing events and expression abnormalities in other relevant genes that may be the cause of a patient’s phenotype.

Methods: using RNA from patient blood, we have systematically assessed transcriptomic profiles of 87 patients with suspected Mendelian disorders, 38% of which did not have a candidate sequence variant. Cases with VUSs and known events were assessed first followed by assessment of cases with no VUS. Each VUS was visually inspected using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) to search for splicing abnormalities. Once aberrant splicing was identified in cases with VUS, multiple open-source alternative splicing tools (MAJIQ, rMATS-turbo, FRASER2 and LeafCutterMD) were used to investigate if they would identify what was observed in IGV. Expression outliers were detected using OUTRIDER. To find diagnoses in cases without a VUS or gene of interest, two separate strategies were used. The first was a genotype to phenotype approach using variant calls obtained from the RNA-sequencing and overlapping those calls with results from splicing tools. The second strategy involved using phenotype information available to filter results from splicing tools.

Results: using RNA-sequencing only, we were able to assess 71% of VUSs and detect aberrant splicing in 14/48 patients with a VUS. Furthermore, we identified four new diagnoses by detecting novel aberrant splicing events in patients with no candidate sequence variants from prior genomic DNA testing (n=33) or those in which the candidate VUS did not affect splicing (n=23) and identified one additional diagnosis through detection of skewed X-inactivation.

Conclusion: we demonstrate the identification of novel diagnoses using an RNA-sequencing first approach in patients without candidate VUSs. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of blood-based RNA analysis in improving diagnostic yields and highlight optimal approaches for such analysis.

Text
2023.07.05.23292254v2.full - Author's Original
Download (3MB)

More information

Published date: 8 July 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493669
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493669
PURE UUID: 9b3163ca-3ad8-4755-afd5-907293015a18
ORCID for Carolina Jaramillo Oquendo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-0998
ORCID for Htoo A Wai: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3560-6980
ORCID for Jenny Lord: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0539-9343
ORCID for Andrew G.L. Douglas: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5154-6714
ORCID for Diana Baralle: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3217-4833

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Sep 2024 16:43
Last modified: 11 Sep 2024 02:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Carolina Jaramillo Oquendo ORCID iD
Author: Htoo A Wai ORCID iD
Author: Will Rich
Author: David J. Bunyan
Author: N. Simon Thomas
Author: David Hunt
Author: Jenny Lord ORCID iD
Author: Diana Baralle ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×