Innovative models that bridge the research-practice divide: research learning communities and research-informed peer review
Innovative models that bridge the research-practice divide: research learning communities and research-informed peer review
This chapter identifies the challenges of bridging the research-practice divide. It outlines two innovative and trialled research-to-practice models. The chapter explains the key principles of each approach and how the two models compare and contrast in terms of the principles underpinning them. It presents evidence of the impact of these models at participating schools. In England, the increased tendency of schools to work in networks or alliances, such as Multi-Academy Trusts or Teaching Schools Alliances has created a demand for robust and rigorous processes for schools to work together, based on established research-informed principles for improving learning and leading change. Conceptually, the research-informed peer review (RiPR) model falls within two fields of research: school internal evaluation and school improvement, most especially the idea of joint practice development. In the RiPR model, schools work in clusters of three for reciprocal review visits during the school year and also attend three half-day workshops.
91-107
Godfrey, David
a2492d5f-9fdf-42c8-9d62-71f1f249d646
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
1 January 2019
Godfrey, David
a2492d5f-9fdf-42c8-9d62-71f1f249d646
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Godfrey, David and Brown, Chris
(2019)
Innovative models that bridge the research-practice divide: research learning communities and research-informed peer review.
In,
An Ecosystem for Research-Engaged Schools: Reforming Education through Research.
Taylor & Francis, .
(doi:10.4324/9780203701027-7).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This chapter identifies the challenges of bridging the research-practice divide. It outlines two innovative and trialled research-to-practice models. The chapter explains the key principles of each approach and how the two models compare and contrast in terms of the principles underpinning them. It presents evidence of the impact of these models at participating schools. In England, the increased tendency of schools to work in networks or alliances, such as Multi-Academy Trusts or Teaching Schools Alliances has created a demand for robust and rigorous processes for schools to work together, based on established research-informed principles for improving learning and leading change. Conceptually, the research-informed peer review (RiPR) model falls within two fields of research: school internal evaluation and school improvement, most especially the idea of joint practice development. In the RiPR model, schools work in clusters of three for reciprocal review visits during the school year and also attend three half-day workshops.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 January 2019
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 selection and editorial matter, David Godfrey and Chris Brown.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493684
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493684
PURE UUID: 51118663-80c5-43d3-8826-092ffda1c980
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Sep 2024 16:56
Last modified: 11 Sep 2024 02:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
David Godfrey
Author:
Chris Brown
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics