The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Going for broke: a multiple-case study of brokerage in education

Going for broke: a multiple-case study of brokerage in education
Going for broke: a multiple-case study of brokerage in education

Although the central role of educational intermediaries that can connect research and practice is increasingly appreciated, our present understanding of their motivations, products, and processes is inadequate. In response, this multiple-case study asks how and why three large-scale intermediaries—Edutopia, the Marshall Memo, and Usable Knowledge—are engaging in brokerage activities, and compares the features of the knowledge they seek to share and mobilize. These entities were deliberately chosen and anticipated to reveal diversity. Multiple data sources were analyzed based primarily upon Ward’s knowledge mobilization framework. These entities contrasted widely, especially in relation to core knowledge dimensions, enabling us to identify two distinct brokerage types. To conclude, theoretical (how to conceptualize brokerage) and practical (how to foster interactive knowledge exchange) implications are presented. This study also reveals certain innovative mobilization approaches, including skillful use of social media and the production of videos depicting how and why to adopt particular strategies.

boundary crossing, boundary objects, brokerage, knowledge mobilization
Malin, Joel R.
af109798-fe38-4804-81e4-f9b36c87051d
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Trubceac, Angela St
4523f775-c713-45f1-90b3-08fa11fc3b51
Malin, Joel R.
af109798-fe38-4804-81e4-f9b36c87051d
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Trubceac, Angela St
4523f775-c713-45f1-90b3-08fa11fc3b51

Malin, Joel R., Brown, Chris and Trubceac, Angela St (2018) Going for broke: a multiple-case study of brokerage in education. AERA Open, 4 (2). (doi:10.1177/2332858418769297).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Although the central role of educational intermediaries that can connect research and practice is increasingly appreciated, our present understanding of their motivations, products, and processes is inadequate. In response, this multiple-case study asks how and why three large-scale intermediaries—Edutopia, the Marshall Memo, and Usable Knowledge—are engaging in brokerage activities, and compares the features of the knowledge they seek to share and mobilize. These entities were deliberately chosen and anticipated to reveal diversity. Multiple data sources were analyzed based primarily upon Ward’s knowledge mobilization framework. These entities contrasted widely, especially in relation to core knowledge dimensions, enabling us to identify two distinct brokerage types. To conclude, theoretical (how to conceptualize brokerage) and practical (how to foster interactive knowledge exchange) implications are presented. This study also reveals certain innovative mobilization approaches, including skillful use of social media and the production of videos depicting how and why to adopt particular strategies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 April 2018
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2018.
Keywords: boundary crossing, boundary objects, brokerage, knowledge mobilization

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493690
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493690
PURE UUID: 2d7ba8f5-5248-4b5c-9f4e-286bdcf62f12
ORCID for Chris Brown: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-9624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Sep 2024 16:56
Last modified: 11 Sep 2024 02:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Joel R. Malin
Author: Chris Brown ORCID iD
Author: Angela St Trubceac

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×