Going for broke: a multiple-case study of brokerage in education
Going for broke: a multiple-case study of brokerage in education
Although the central role of educational intermediaries that can connect research and practice is increasingly appreciated, our present understanding of their motivations, products, and processes is inadequate. In response, this multiple-case study asks how and why three large-scale intermediaries—Edutopia, the Marshall Memo, and Usable Knowledge—are engaging in brokerage activities, and compares the features of the knowledge they seek to share and mobilize. These entities were deliberately chosen and anticipated to reveal diversity. Multiple data sources were analyzed based primarily upon Ward’s knowledge mobilization framework. These entities contrasted widely, especially in relation to core knowledge dimensions, enabling us to identify two distinct brokerage types. To conclude, theoretical (how to conceptualize brokerage) and practical (how to foster interactive knowledge exchange) implications are presented. This study also reveals certain innovative mobilization approaches, including skillful use of social media and the production of videos depicting how and why to adopt particular strategies.
boundary crossing, boundary objects, brokerage, knowledge mobilization
Malin, Joel R.
af109798-fe38-4804-81e4-f9b36c87051d
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Trubceac, Angela St
4523f775-c713-45f1-90b3-08fa11fc3b51
1 April 2018
Malin, Joel R.
af109798-fe38-4804-81e4-f9b36c87051d
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Trubceac, Angela St
4523f775-c713-45f1-90b3-08fa11fc3b51
Malin, Joel R., Brown, Chris and Trubceac, Angela St
(2018)
Going for broke: a multiple-case study of brokerage in education.
AERA Open, 4 (2).
(doi:10.1177/2332858418769297).
Abstract
Although the central role of educational intermediaries that can connect research and practice is increasingly appreciated, our present understanding of their motivations, products, and processes is inadequate. In response, this multiple-case study asks how and why three large-scale intermediaries—Edutopia, the Marshall Memo, and Usable Knowledge—are engaging in brokerage activities, and compares the features of the knowledge they seek to share and mobilize. These entities were deliberately chosen and anticipated to reveal diversity. Multiple data sources were analyzed based primarily upon Ward’s knowledge mobilization framework. These entities contrasted widely, especially in relation to core knowledge dimensions, enabling us to identify two distinct brokerage types. To conclude, theoretical (how to conceptualize brokerage) and practical (how to foster interactive knowledge exchange) implications are presented. This study also reveals certain innovative mobilization approaches, including skillful use of social media and the production of videos depicting how and why to adopt particular strategies.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 April 2018
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
Keywords:
boundary crossing, boundary objects, brokerage, knowledge mobilization
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493690
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493690
PURE UUID: 2d7ba8f5-5248-4b5c-9f4e-286bdcf62f12
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Sep 2024 16:56
Last modified: 11 Sep 2024 02:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Joel R. Malin
Author:
Chris Brown
Author:
Angela St Trubceac
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics