The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Using risk analysis to determine the potential range of lifecycle costs for urban transit systems

Using risk analysis to determine the potential range of lifecycle costs for urban transit systems
Using risk analysis to determine the potential range of lifecycle costs for urban transit systems
Intense competition for limited public funding for urban transport projects can often result in proponents of individual schemes presenting minimized costs and maximized benefits to funding bodies to try to ensure that their scheme is chosen above others for funding. This presents public bodies with a problem, especially in an era when they are keen to attract private contributions for transit schemes. Risk modelling techniques can be of great assistance in ascertaining ranges of costs and benefits for individual submissions and deciding upon which projects should receive priority-not only those with greatest cost-benefit indices, but also those whose indices have low levels of associated risk to allay the fears of the traditionally risk averse private sector.
0144-1647
403-420
Ashmore, David P.
414351fb-6bb8-4836-ba51-c6271c39b932
Harris, Nigel G.
4ee77bc9-7c5a-403f-a906-6cbdac53c40a
Ashmore, David P.
414351fb-6bb8-4836-ba51-c6271c39b932
Harris, Nigel G.
4ee77bc9-7c5a-403f-a906-6cbdac53c40a

Ashmore, David P. and Harris, Nigel G. (2000) Using risk analysis to determine the potential range of lifecycle costs for urban transit systems. Transport Reviews, 20 (4), 403-420. (doi:10.1080/01441640050150667).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Intense competition for limited public funding for urban transport projects can often result in proponents of individual schemes presenting minimized costs and maximized benefits to funding bodies to try to ensure that their scheme is chosen above others for funding. This presents public bodies with a problem, especially in an era when they are keen to attract private contributions for transit schemes. Risk modelling techniques can be of great assistance in ascertaining ranges of costs and benefits for individual submissions and deciding upon which projects should receive priority-not only those with greatest cost-benefit indices, but also those whose indices have low levels of associated risk to allay the fears of the traditionally risk averse private sector.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493694
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493694
ISSN: 0144-1647
PURE UUID: 74fead6e-dd26-471b-8c8e-9683e2a6bb82
ORCID for David P. Ashmore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-1962

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Sep 2024 16:30
Last modified: 12 Sep 2024 02:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: David P. Ashmore ORCID iD
Author: Nigel G. Harris

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×