Hybrid Bus Technology: Economic Modeling
Hybrid Bus Technology: Economic Modeling
Hybrid electric–diesel engine technologies could reduce fuel consumption in buses by around 40%, with various studies identifying fuel consumption savings of between 10% and 75% depending on operating conditions. Most of the benefit comes from regenerative braking—storing in a battery energy that would otherwise have been lost under braking. Lower fuel consumption makes sense economically for bus operators through reduced running costs, but hybrid engines also have wider benefits, such as reducing emissions and noise and providing smoother acceleration and braking. The costs associated with hybrid technologies are significant, though, with hybrid vehicles currently costing around 50% more than conventional buses. The lithium-ion batteries are the largest additional cost component, and there is considerable uncertainty over their longevity. This entry investigates the economics of introducing hybrid bus technologies from a through-life perspective. We find that fuel and emissions savings alone provide a relatively weak case for investing in hybrid buses based on current prices. However, as the cost of fuel rises, and when social and environmental impacts of motor vehicle use are better accounted for, hybrid technology outperforms conventional diesel technology.
Emes, Michael
f2698c6d-5de1-4165-9558-cd728866e6c8
Ashmore, David
414351fb-6bb8-4836-ba51-c6271c39b932
June 2016
Emes, Michael
f2698c6d-5de1-4165-9558-cd728866e6c8
Ashmore, David
414351fb-6bb8-4836-ba51-c6271c39b932
Emes, Michael and Ashmore, David
(2016)
Hybrid Bus Technology: Economic Modeling.
In,
Anwar, Sohail
(ed.)
Encyclopedia of Energy Engineering and Technology.
2 ed.
Taylor & Francis.
(doi:10.1081/e-eee2-120051344).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
Hybrid electric–diesel engine technologies could reduce fuel consumption in buses by around 40%, with various studies identifying fuel consumption savings of between 10% and 75% depending on operating conditions. Most of the benefit comes from regenerative braking—storing in a battery energy that would otherwise have been lost under braking. Lower fuel consumption makes sense economically for bus operators through reduced running costs, but hybrid engines also have wider benefits, such as reducing emissions and noise and providing smoother acceleration and braking. The costs associated with hybrid technologies are significant, though, with hybrid vehicles currently costing around 50% more than conventional buses. The lithium-ion batteries are the largest additional cost component, and there is considerable uncertainty over their longevity. This entry investigates the economics of introducing hybrid bus technologies from a through-life perspective. We find that fuel and emissions savings alone provide a relatively weak case for investing in hybrid buses based on current prices. However, as the cost of fuel rises, and when social and environmental impacts of motor vehicle use are better accounted for, hybrid technology outperforms conventional diesel technology.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: June 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 493811
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493811
PURE UUID: 868387da-5440-42eb-b071-5a5da8a1eb52
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Sep 2024 17:28
Last modified: 14 Sep 2024 02:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Michael Emes
Author:
David Ashmore
Editor:
Sohail Anwar
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics