The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Oxygen uptake kinetics and ventilatory and metabolic parameters do not differ between moderate-intensity front crawl and breaststroke swimming

Oxygen uptake kinetics and ventilatory and metabolic parameters do not differ between moderate-intensity front crawl and breaststroke swimming
Oxygen uptake kinetics and ventilatory and metabolic parameters do not differ between moderate-intensity front crawl and breaststroke swimming
Pulmonary oxygen uptake (O2) kinetics have been well studied during land-based exercise. However, less is known about O2 kinetics during swimming exercise and comparisons between strokes is non-existent. We aimed to characterise and compare the O2 kinetics, ventilatory and metabolic response to constant velocity moderate-intensity freely breathing front crawl (FC) and breaststroke (BR) swimming in a swimming flume. These two strokes reflect predominantly upper body vs lower body modes of swimming locomotion, respectively. Eight trained swimmers (4 females, 20 ± 1 years, 1.74 ± 0.06 m; 66.8 ± 6.3 kg) attended 5-6 laboratory-based swimming sessions. The first two trials determined FC and BR O2max and the ventilatory threshold (VT), respectively, during progressive intensity swimming to the limit of tolerance. Subsequent trials involved counterbalanced FC and BR transitions from prone floating to constant velocity moderate-intensity swimming at 80% of the velocity at VT (vVT), separated by 30-minutes recovery. Breath-by-breath changes in pulmonary gas exchange and ventilation were measured continuously using a snorkel and aquatic metabolic cart system. The ventilatory and metabolic responses were similar (p > 0.05) between strokes during maximal velocity swimming, however vVT and maximal velocity were slower (p < 0.05) during BR. During moderate-intensity swimming, O2 kinetics, ventilatory and metabolic parameters were similar (p > 0.05) between strokes. In conclusion, when breathing ad libitum, O2 kinetics during moderate-intensity constant velocity swimming, and ventilatory and metabolic responses during moderate-intensity and maximal velocity swimming, are similar between FC and BR strokes.
flume, muscle metabolism, swimming, O2 kinetics
Lomax, Mitch
ae26a95d-df12-40d7-9f4e-d8165bf14991
Royal, Joshua T.
bdaabfdb-8e01-4fba-b977-41eeca9601d9
Jernej, Kapus
e6f141c8-1cba-452a-8fa7-1c4bf804b9e4
Massey, Heather
83363ca3-87b3-4f0c-85f6-685dc56e7bbd
Saynor, Zoe
a4357c7d-db59-4fa5-b24f-58d2f7e74e39
Lomax, Mitch
ae26a95d-df12-40d7-9f4e-d8165bf14991
Royal, Joshua T.
bdaabfdb-8e01-4fba-b977-41eeca9601d9
Jernej, Kapus
e6f141c8-1cba-452a-8fa7-1c4bf804b9e4
Massey, Heather
83363ca3-87b3-4f0c-85f6-685dc56e7bbd
Saynor, Zoe
a4357c7d-db59-4fa5-b24f-58d2f7e74e39

Lomax, Mitch, Royal, Joshua T., Jernej, Kapus, Massey, Heather and Saynor, Zoe (2022) Oxygen uptake kinetics and ventilatory and metabolic parameters do not differ between moderate-intensity front crawl and breaststroke swimming. Physiological Reports, 10 (12), [e15361]. (doi:10.14814/phy2.15361).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Pulmonary oxygen uptake (O2) kinetics have been well studied during land-based exercise. However, less is known about O2 kinetics during swimming exercise and comparisons between strokes is non-existent. We aimed to characterise and compare the O2 kinetics, ventilatory and metabolic response to constant velocity moderate-intensity freely breathing front crawl (FC) and breaststroke (BR) swimming in a swimming flume. These two strokes reflect predominantly upper body vs lower body modes of swimming locomotion, respectively. Eight trained swimmers (4 females, 20 ± 1 years, 1.74 ± 0.06 m; 66.8 ± 6.3 kg) attended 5-6 laboratory-based swimming sessions. The first two trials determined FC and BR O2max and the ventilatory threshold (VT), respectively, during progressive intensity swimming to the limit of tolerance. Subsequent trials involved counterbalanced FC and BR transitions from prone floating to constant velocity moderate-intensity swimming at 80% of the velocity at VT (vVT), separated by 30-minutes recovery. Breath-by-breath changes in pulmonary gas exchange and ventilation were measured continuously using a snorkel and aquatic metabolic cart system. The ventilatory and metabolic responses were similar (p > 0.05) between strokes during maximal velocity swimming, however vVT and maximal velocity were slower (p < 0.05) during BR. During moderate-intensity swimming, O2 kinetics, ventilatory and metabolic parameters were similar (p > 0.05) between strokes. In conclusion, when breathing ad libitum, O2 kinetics during moderate-intensity constant velocity swimming, and ventilatory and metabolic responses during moderate-intensity and maximal velocity swimming, are similar between FC and BR strokes.

Text
Physiological Reports - 2022 - Lomax - Oxygen uptake kinetics and ventilatory and metabolic parameters do not differ - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (814kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 May 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 June 2022
Published date: 27 June 2022
Keywords: flume, muscle metabolism, swimming, O2 kinetics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493830
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493830
PURE UUID: 4f61f5c1-cfe6-43f8-a195-c57b08128dfd
ORCID for Zoe Saynor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-8477

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Sep 2024 16:50
Last modified: 14 Sep 2024 02:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mitch Lomax
Author: Joshua T. Royal
Author: Kapus Jernej
Author: Heather Massey
Author: Zoe Saynor ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×