The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The development and internal pilot trial of a digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention (Kidney BEAM) for people with chronic kidney disease

The development and internal pilot trial of a digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention (Kidney BEAM) for people with chronic kidney disease
The development and internal pilot trial of a digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention (Kidney BEAM) for people with chronic kidney disease
This trial assessed the feasibility and acceptability of Kidney BEAM, a physical activity and emotional well-being self-management digital health intervention (DHI) for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which offers live and on-demand physical activity sessions, educational blogs and videos, and peer support. In this mixed-methods, multicentre randomised waitlist-controlled internal pilot, adults with established CKD were recruited from five NHS hospitals and randomised 1:1 to Kidney BEAM or waitlist control. Feasibility outcomes were based upon a priori progression criteria. Acceptability was primarily explored via individual semi-structured interviews (n = 15). Of 763 individuals screened, n = 519 (68%, 95% CI 65 to 71%) were eligible. Of those eligible, n = 303 (58%, 95% CI 54-63%) did not respond to an invitation to participate by the end of the pilot period. Of the 216 responders, 50 (23%, 95% CI 18-29%) consented. Of the 42 randomised, n = 22 (10 (45%) male; 49 ± 16 years; 14 (64%) White British) were allocated to Kidney BEAM and n = 20 (12 (55%) male; 56 ± 11 years; 15 (68%) White British) to the waitlist control group. Overall, n = 15 (30%, 95% CI 18-45%) withdrew during the pilot phase. Participants completed a median of 14 (IQR 5-21) sessions. At baseline, 90-100% of outcome data (patient reported outcome measures and a remotely conducted physical function test) were completed and 62-83% completed at 12 weeks follow-up. Interview data revealed that remote trial procedures were acceptable. Participants' reported that Kidney BEAM increased their opportunity and motivation to be physically active, however, lack of time remained an ongoing barrier to engagement with the DHI. An randomised controlled trial of Kidney BEAM is feasible and acceptable, with adaptations to increase recruitment, retention and engagement.Trial registration NCT04872933. Date of first registration 05/05/2021.
2045-2322
Young, Hannah M.L.
36e9f554-b090-4cb4-92e3-756f49456bcd
Castle, Ellen M.
a512670e-edb9-4ccc-9eff-a39ac719287d
Briggs, Juliet
69eadf14-75a6-4dec-9cca-bc8beb5af3e3
Walklin, Christy
513bba64-15dd-470a-80df-485019f7a9e1
Billany, Roseanne E.
0a4a773b-8d2e-4309-91cc-c352537b8a37
Asgari, Elham
ec640525-527f-43b6-a355-25be08d8188c
Bhandari, Sunil
94f58ff7-38b5-45af-bf7a-7648ab77b094
Bishop, Nicolette
1ea56797-bdb1-4ad3-ab11-0c6e57ef964b
Bramham, Kate
195dd9af-e91c-4fb2-8ee8-37bfb80e83a3
Burton, James O.
07e54a9c-016c-4990-8c81-cf13711b5cbb
Campbell, Jackie
e6328bfb-7ef4-4f25-a33f-357f8a1a7d00
Chilcot, Joseph
8629be02-350f-4ad4-afaf-11879b2c38a2
Cooper, Nicola
3cafdcda-6e1c-40a0-9b8f-5fe9a027245b
Deelchand, Vashist
c39e02b5-4770-4503-8ffd-06ba6d048f0e
Graham-Brown, Matthew P. M.
7b7f8cba-95a0-44e0-8a06-6f43e3d91bc3
Haggis, Lynda
6045df05-e4b5-4758-a0a6-595b6800f1e9
Hamilton, Alexander
5cb13681-f7d7-47a9-85ed-c6faa2e48c86
Jesky, Mark
0500316b-cd7b-4023-8d0f-c0a10efff924
Kalra, Philip A.
4278013c-f46e-4757-b46f-4e0251cfde4a
Koufaki, Pelagia
2f643b23-8b17-4ba8-8aef-0a878f12803b
Macdonald, Jamie
eda4c010-298d-42ac-8fc7-47f015f3e0eb
McCafferty, Kieran
b958049e-7b96-45cd-b384-32fde4d84aaf
Nixon, Andrew C.
8935e1f4-01c5-4c97-8789-a92984dc976f
Noble, Helen
65485329-4bed-4f9b-96c1-26e7f91e531f
Saynor, Zoe L.
a4357c7d-db59-4fa5-b24f-58d2f7e74e39
Taal, Maarten W.
10eeea62-a2fc-43b6-b5af-359e75c501ea
Tollitt, James
12d804da-1991-4d48-b7f0-26329a06ea84
Wheeler, David C.
7ba656e2-c874-4520-9d6e-a5fde2921ee8
Wilkinson, Thomas J.
8f14bc99-2507-4ab1-9ad8-0b8dc63ecd76
Greenwood, Sharlene A.
1c2ec67b-3837-4ddd-b0cc-57c5168c276c
et al.
Young, Hannah M.L.
36e9f554-b090-4cb4-92e3-756f49456bcd
Castle, Ellen M.
a512670e-edb9-4ccc-9eff-a39ac719287d
Briggs, Juliet
69eadf14-75a6-4dec-9cca-bc8beb5af3e3
Walklin, Christy
513bba64-15dd-470a-80df-485019f7a9e1
Billany, Roseanne E.
0a4a773b-8d2e-4309-91cc-c352537b8a37
Asgari, Elham
ec640525-527f-43b6-a355-25be08d8188c
Bhandari, Sunil
94f58ff7-38b5-45af-bf7a-7648ab77b094
Bishop, Nicolette
1ea56797-bdb1-4ad3-ab11-0c6e57ef964b
Bramham, Kate
195dd9af-e91c-4fb2-8ee8-37bfb80e83a3
Burton, James O.
07e54a9c-016c-4990-8c81-cf13711b5cbb
Campbell, Jackie
e6328bfb-7ef4-4f25-a33f-357f8a1a7d00
Chilcot, Joseph
8629be02-350f-4ad4-afaf-11879b2c38a2
Cooper, Nicola
3cafdcda-6e1c-40a0-9b8f-5fe9a027245b
Deelchand, Vashist
c39e02b5-4770-4503-8ffd-06ba6d048f0e
Graham-Brown, Matthew P. M.
7b7f8cba-95a0-44e0-8a06-6f43e3d91bc3
Haggis, Lynda
6045df05-e4b5-4758-a0a6-595b6800f1e9
Hamilton, Alexander
5cb13681-f7d7-47a9-85ed-c6faa2e48c86
Jesky, Mark
0500316b-cd7b-4023-8d0f-c0a10efff924
Kalra, Philip A.
4278013c-f46e-4757-b46f-4e0251cfde4a
Koufaki, Pelagia
2f643b23-8b17-4ba8-8aef-0a878f12803b
Macdonald, Jamie
eda4c010-298d-42ac-8fc7-47f015f3e0eb
McCafferty, Kieran
b958049e-7b96-45cd-b384-32fde4d84aaf
Nixon, Andrew C.
8935e1f4-01c5-4c97-8789-a92984dc976f
Noble, Helen
65485329-4bed-4f9b-96c1-26e7f91e531f
Saynor, Zoe L.
a4357c7d-db59-4fa5-b24f-58d2f7e74e39
Taal, Maarten W.
10eeea62-a2fc-43b6-b5af-359e75c501ea
Tollitt, James
12d804da-1991-4d48-b7f0-26329a06ea84
Wheeler, David C.
7ba656e2-c874-4520-9d6e-a5fde2921ee8
Wilkinson, Thomas J.
8f14bc99-2507-4ab1-9ad8-0b8dc63ecd76
Greenwood, Sharlene A.
1c2ec67b-3837-4ddd-b0cc-57c5168c276c

Young, Hannah M.L., Castle, Ellen M. and Briggs, Juliet , et al. (2024) The development and internal pilot trial of a digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention (Kidney BEAM) for people with chronic kidney disease. Scientific Reports, 14 (1), [700]. (doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50507-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This trial assessed the feasibility and acceptability of Kidney BEAM, a physical activity and emotional well-being self-management digital health intervention (DHI) for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which offers live and on-demand physical activity sessions, educational blogs and videos, and peer support. In this mixed-methods, multicentre randomised waitlist-controlled internal pilot, adults with established CKD were recruited from five NHS hospitals and randomised 1:1 to Kidney BEAM or waitlist control. Feasibility outcomes were based upon a priori progression criteria. Acceptability was primarily explored via individual semi-structured interviews (n = 15). Of 763 individuals screened, n = 519 (68%, 95% CI 65 to 71%) were eligible. Of those eligible, n = 303 (58%, 95% CI 54-63%) did not respond to an invitation to participate by the end of the pilot period. Of the 216 responders, 50 (23%, 95% CI 18-29%) consented. Of the 42 randomised, n = 22 (10 (45%) male; 49 ± 16 years; 14 (64%) White British) were allocated to Kidney BEAM and n = 20 (12 (55%) male; 56 ± 11 years; 15 (68%) White British) to the waitlist control group. Overall, n = 15 (30%, 95% CI 18-45%) withdrew during the pilot phase. Participants completed a median of 14 (IQR 5-21) sessions. At baseline, 90-100% of outcome data (patient reported outcome measures and a remotely conducted physical function test) were completed and 62-83% completed at 12 weeks follow-up. Interview data revealed that remote trial procedures were acceptable. Participants' reported that Kidney BEAM increased their opportunity and motivation to be physically active, however, lack of time remained an ongoing barrier to engagement with the DHI. An randomised controlled trial of Kidney BEAM is feasible and acceptable, with adaptations to increase recruitment, retention and engagement.Trial registration NCT04872933. Date of first registration 05/05/2021.

Text
s41598-023-50507-4 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 December 2023
Published date: 6 January 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493854
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493854
ISSN: 2045-2322
PURE UUID: d44b10c3-9019-4379-8182-5c990f6f404e
ORCID for Zoe L. Saynor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-8477

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2024 16:34
Last modified: 17 Sep 2024 02:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Hannah M.L. Young
Author: Ellen M. Castle
Author: Juliet Briggs
Author: Christy Walklin
Author: Roseanne E. Billany
Author: Elham Asgari
Author: Sunil Bhandari
Author: Nicolette Bishop
Author: Kate Bramham
Author: James O. Burton
Author: Jackie Campbell
Author: Joseph Chilcot
Author: Nicola Cooper
Author: Vashist Deelchand
Author: Matthew P. M. Graham-Brown
Author: Lynda Haggis
Author: Alexander Hamilton
Author: Mark Jesky
Author: Philip A. Kalra
Author: Pelagia Koufaki
Author: Jamie Macdonald
Author: Kieran McCafferty
Author: Andrew C. Nixon
Author: Helen Noble
Author: Zoe L. Saynor ORCID iD
Author: Maarten W. Taal
Author: James Tollitt
Author: David C. Wheeler
Author: Thomas J. Wilkinson
Author: Sharlene A. Greenwood
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×