Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence
Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence
The authors review and evaluate various explanations for the tendency of intergroup relations to be more competitive, or less cooperative, than interindividual relations (the discontinuity effect). They distinguish between two general perspectives, each comprising a set of explanations for the discontinuity effect. The fear and greed perspective assumes that intergroup relations are characterised by greater fear and greed than are interindividual relations. The group decision-making perspective assumes a crucial role for group discussion in facilitating rational comprehension of mixed-motive situations. In general, explanations from the fear and greed perspective were found to be more consistent with the empirical record than explanations from the group decision-making perspective. The authors propose that a complete understanding of the discontinuity effect is yet to be achieved.
discontinuity effect, intergroup conflict, intergroup relations, interindividual-intergroup discontinuity, prisoner's dilemma game
175-211
Wildschut, T.
4452a61d-1649-4c4a-bb1d-154ec446ff81
Insko, C.A.
17fe5fab-930c-46f0-87aa-53b0324e4c0f
26 October 2007
Wildschut, T.
4452a61d-1649-4c4a-bb1d-154ec446ff81
Insko, C.A.
17fe5fab-930c-46f0-87aa-53b0324e4c0f
Wildschut, T. and Insko, C.A.
(2007)
Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence.
European Review of Social Psychology, 18 (1), .
(doi:10.1080/10463280701676543).
Abstract
The authors review and evaluate various explanations for the tendency of intergroup relations to be more competitive, or less cooperative, than interindividual relations (the discontinuity effect). They distinguish between two general perspectives, each comprising a set of explanations for the discontinuity effect. The fear and greed perspective assumes that intergroup relations are characterised by greater fear and greed than are interindividual relations. The group decision-making perspective assumes a crucial role for group discussion in facilitating rational comprehension of mixed-motive situations. In general, explanations from the fear and greed perspective were found to be more consistent with the empirical record than explanations from the group decision-making perspective. The authors propose that a complete understanding of the discontinuity effect is yet to be achieved.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 26 October 2007
Keywords:
discontinuity effect, intergroup conflict, intergroup relations, interindividual-intergroup discontinuity, prisoner's dilemma game
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 49397
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/49397
ISSN: 1046-3283
PURE UUID: 7df624c9-543d-4652-b9ec-83d222722e9c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Nov 2007
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
C.A. Insko
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics