The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Predicting COVID-19 infection risk in lymphoma by immune monitoring

Predicting COVID-19 infection risk in lymphoma by immune monitoring
Predicting COVID-19 infection risk in lymphoma by immune monitoring
Introduction: patients with B-cell lymphoma have poorer antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines compared to patients with other malignancies. However, the immune responses are heterogeneous and its association with clinical outcomes are poorly understood. Here, we study the association between antibody and cellular responses with the outcomes from COVID-19 infection from the PROSECO study.

Methods: THE UK PROSECO study is a prospective observational cohort study evaluating COVID-19 vaccine response in people with lymphoma. Peripheral blood antibody titres (anti-spike (S) IgG by Mesoscale Discovery), antibody avidity (surface plasmon resonance) and IFNγ T-cell responses (ELISpot) against spike protein after two to four COVID-19 vaccines, and clinical outcomes data were collected.

Results: 524 patients (92 Hodgkin lymphoma, 180 aggressive B non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), 234 indolent B-NHL and 18 peripheral T-cell lymphoma) were included: 334 (84·3%), 315 (79·5%) and 266 (67·1%) participants were eligible for post-two, three and four vaccine dose analysis, respectively. Breakthrough infections (BTI) occurred in 20 (5.9%), 40 (12.7%) and 36 (13.5%) participants after two, three and four vaccine doses. Of 96 participants with BTI, 12 (12.5%) needed hospitalisation. No deaths were observed due to COVID-19 infection. No differences were observed in T-cell responses between BTI and non-BTI groups, but 4/9 (44.5%) hospitalised BTI cases had undetectable cellular and antibody responses. There was no association between antibody titres and infection episodes after two vaccine doses, but antibody titres were associated with lower BTI risk after three or four vaccine doses on multivariable analysis. Intriguingly, the antibody threshold associated with infection risk was lower after four than three vaccine doses (41 vs. 820 BAU/mL). We also observed stronger antibody binding avidity to SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) proteins from Wuhan and Omicron BQ.1 variants, with increasing vaccine doses, i.e., fourth versus third dose: 10-fold increase (p: <0.01); fourth versus second dose:100-fold-increase than the second dose (p: <0.0001) (see Figure).

Conclusion: anti-S antibody titres can predict the risk of COVID-19 infection after three or more vaccine doses in patients with lymphoma. Repeated COVID-19 vaccination drives antibody affinity maturation and consequently improves the strength of antibody binding to virus spike proteins. Nearly half of participants who required hospitalisation for COVID-19 had undetectable antibody and cellular immunity to vaccination. Altogether, these data show the importance of booster vaccine doses and immune monitoring post COVID-19 vaccination to identify lymphoma patients who still continue to be at risk from severe COVID-19, and thus the best prophylactic and therapeutic strategies.
0278-0232
606-607
Wijaya, R.
03dbd605-74df-4a5b-ad44-d04f7b17f5f4
Campbell, N.
fde07dcf-4874-4bab-ab3a-c3bc3c0015da
Johnson, M.
31dbf674-cb49-4db5-9465-1c27df5d85dc
Stuart, B.
4670b0f0-fa9f-458c-9fa1-50baf10c27d4
Kelly, A.
f1934867-f5b4-4894-9336-4f6f878206c2
Tipler, N.
26959e6c-3a73-441e-9c7d-dfc3264cd81f
Coleman, A.
49cf504d-6f2b-422b-9c3a-17eb5d5d6a85
Turaj, A.
fbbc48ea-28cf-4db7-ae4a-c16ce7b3857a
Menne, T.
c6321e46-2fc2-456e-a7aa-b39104d08eb6
Ahearne, M.
0a31f292-03ba-4d74-b485-321222dcb84b
Willimott, V.
4889fc95-6610-423f-bfc9-8a9617f8fc32
Al-Naeeb, A. Bowzyk
b89240a6-bf76-46d6-8ac6-dbe2ade1c2c1
Fox, C.P.
56f823d1-e1a5-4c16-9977-002229cd9a17
Collins, G.P.
450338cb-2bb0-4cef-90a7-7bcd47a12e2f
O'Callaghan, A.
e9a494fb-76e9-49bd-b186-2a5286bb3f37
Davies, A.J.
0fe6a40a-10d1-4ade-a7e6-d1dceb2470af
Goldblatt, D.
3f9d26e2-06f2-4778-a3d8-1a88bbed9c0f
Lim, S.H.
1afe5aa1-61a4-4a7b-927f-5e671f885196
Wijaya, R.
03dbd605-74df-4a5b-ad44-d04f7b17f5f4
Campbell, N.
fde07dcf-4874-4bab-ab3a-c3bc3c0015da
Johnson, M.
31dbf674-cb49-4db5-9465-1c27df5d85dc
Stuart, B.
4670b0f0-fa9f-458c-9fa1-50baf10c27d4
Kelly, A.
f1934867-f5b4-4894-9336-4f6f878206c2
Tipler, N.
26959e6c-3a73-441e-9c7d-dfc3264cd81f
Coleman, A.
49cf504d-6f2b-422b-9c3a-17eb5d5d6a85
Turaj, A.
fbbc48ea-28cf-4db7-ae4a-c16ce7b3857a
Menne, T.
c6321e46-2fc2-456e-a7aa-b39104d08eb6
Ahearne, M.
0a31f292-03ba-4d74-b485-321222dcb84b
Willimott, V.
4889fc95-6610-423f-bfc9-8a9617f8fc32
Al-Naeeb, A. Bowzyk
b89240a6-bf76-46d6-8ac6-dbe2ade1c2c1
Fox, C.P.
56f823d1-e1a5-4c16-9977-002229cd9a17
Collins, G.P.
450338cb-2bb0-4cef-90a7-7bcd47a12e2f
O'Callaghan, A.
e9a494fb-76e9-49bd-b186-2a5286bb3f37
Davies, A.J.
0fe6a40a-10d1-4ade-a7e6-d1dceb2470af
Goldblatt, D.
3f9d26e2-06f2-4778-a3d8-1a88bbed9c0f
Lim, S.H.
1afe5aa1-61a4-4a7b-927f-5e671f885196

Wijaya, R., Campbell, N., Johnson, M., Stuart, B., Kelly, A., Tipler, N., Coleman, A., Turaj, A., Menne, T., Ahearne, M., Willimott, V., Al-Naeeb, A. Bowzyk, Fox, C.P., Collins, G.P., O'Callaghan, A., Davies, A.J., Goldblatt, D. and Lim, S.H. (2023) Predicting COVID-19 infection risk in lymphoma by immune monitoring. Hematological Oncology, 41 (S2), 606-607. (doi:10.1002/hon.3164_456).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Introduction: patients with B-cell lymphoma have poorer antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines compared to patients with other malignancies. However, the immune responses are heterogeneous and its association with clinical outcomes are poorly understood. Here, we study the association between antibody and cellular responses with the outcomes from COVID-19 infection from the PROSECO study.

Methods: THE UK PROSECO study is a prospective observational cohort study evaluating COVID-19 vaccine response in people with lymphoma. Peripheral blood antibody titres (anti-spike (S) IgG by Mesoscale Discovery), antibody avidity (surface plasmon resonance) and IFNγ T-cell responses (ELISpot) against spike protein after two to four COVID-19 vaccines, and clinical outcomes data were collected.

Results: 524 patients (92 Hodgkin lymphoma, 180 aggressive B non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), 234 indolent B-NHL and 18 peripheral T-cell lymphoma) were included: 334 (84·3%), 315 (79·5%) and 266 (67·1%) participants were eligible for post-two, three and four vaccine dose analysis, respectively. Breakthrough infections (BTI) occurred in 20 (5.9%), 40 (12.7%) and 36 (13.5%) participants after two, three and four vaccine doses. Of 96 participants with BTI, 12 (12.5%) needed hospitalisation. No deaths were observed due to COVID-19 infection. No differences were observed in T-cell responses between BTI and non-BTI groups, but 4/9 (44.5%) hospitalised BTI cases had undetectable cellular and antibody responses. There was no association between antibody titres and infection episodes after two vaccine doses, but antibody titres were associated with lower BTI risk after three or four vaccine doses on multivariable analysis. Intriguingly, the antibody threshold associated with infection risk was lower after four than three vaccine doses (41 vs. 820 BAU/mL). We also observed stronger antibody binding avidity to SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) proteins from Wuhan and Omicron BQ.1 variants, with increasing vaccine doses, i.e., fourth versus third dose: 10-fold increase (p: <0.01); fourth versus second dose:100-fold-increase than the second dose (p: <0.0001) (see Figure).

Conclusion: anti-S antibody titres can predict the risk of COVID-19 infection after three or more vaccine doses in patients with lymphoma. Repeated COVID-19 vaccination drives antibody affinity maturation and consequently improves the strength of antibody binding to virus spike proteins. Nearly half of participants who required hospitalisation for COVID-19 had undetectable antibody and cellular immunity to vaccination. Altogether, these data show the importance of booster vaccine doses and immune monitoring post COVID-19 vaccination to identify lymphoma patients who still continue to be at risk from severe COVID-19, and thus the best prophylactic and therapeutic strategies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 9 June 2023
Published date: 9 June 2023
Venue - Dates: 17th ICML International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma, Palazzo dei Congressi, Lugano, Switzerland, 2023-06-13 - 2023-06-17

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494001
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494001
ISSN: 0278-0232
PURE UUID: 4901b8c8-7437-4d97-b8a2-d8d17e68118f
ORCID for N. Campbell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-5434
ORCID for A.J. Davies: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-6938

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Sep 2024 16:44
Last modified: 21 Sep 2024 01:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R. Wijaya
Author: N. Campbell ORCID iD
Author: M. Johnson
Author: B. Stuart
Author: A. Kelly
Author: N. Tipler
Author: A. Coleman
Author: A. Turaj
Author: T. Menne
Author: M. Ahearne
Author: V. Willimott
Author: A. Bowzyk Al-Naeeb
Author: C.P. Fox
Author: G.P. Collins
Author: A. O'Callaghan
Author: A.J. Davies ORCID iD
Author: D. Goldblatt
Author: S.H. Lim

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×