The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization: international multicentre study

Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization: international multicentre study
Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization: international multicentre study

Background: laparoscopic liver surgery is increasingly used for more challenging procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization. 

Methods: this was an international retrospective multicentre study of patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent open or laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy after portal vein embolization between 2004 and 2020. The perioperative and oncological outcomes for patients who underwent laparoscopic and open approaches were compared using propensity score matching. 

Results: of 338 patients, 84 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure and 254 patients underwent an open procedure. Patients in the laparoscopic group less often underwent extended right hepatectomy (18% versus 34.6% (P = 0.004)), procedures in the setting of a two-stage hepatectomy (42% versus 65% (P < 0.001)), and major concurrent procedures (4% versus 16.1% (P = 0.003)). After propensity score matching, 78 patients remained in each group. The laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operating and Pringle times (330 versus 258.5 min (P < 0.001) and 65 versus 30 min (P = 0.001) respectively) and a shorter length of stay (7 versus 8 days (P = 0.011)). The R0 resection rate was not different (71% for the laparoscopic approach versus 60% for the open approach (P = 0.230)). The median disease-free survival was 12 (95% c.i. 10 to 20) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 20 (95% c.i. 13 to 31) months for the open approach (P = 0.145). The median overall survival was 28 (95% c.i. 22 to 48) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 42 (95% c.i. 35 to 52) months for the open approach (P = 0.614). 

Conclusion: the advantages of a laparoscopic over an open approach for (extended) right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization are limited.

Aged, Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology, Embolization, Therapeutic/methods, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hepatectomy/methods, Humans, Laparoscopy/methods, Length of Stay, Liver Neoplasms/secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Portal Vein/surgery, Propensity Score, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome
0007-1323
Bozkurt, Emre
663ca3d5-c9e6-4698-8c50-8605602d4055
Sijberden, Jasper P.
9d954519-5768-4cc9-a6c4-2cb3a051a212
Langella, Serena
7bb52936-5e41-4834-996d-9d71b5c762f7
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Collado-Roura, Francesc
1fe0ca5a-7cdf-4354-9b40-d58874ac44cd
Morrison-Jones, Victoria
42607321-18d8-4e4f-b66f-7ab3f54697b7
Görgec, Burak
57ac6eda-4ee2-474e-8369-a74ec4f6ca35
Zozaya, Gabriel
03afd1a9-3bea-4fee-b5c0-5410bc12f71c
Lanari, Jacopo
ac1a25d8-50ec-494c-a14e-47fe751da1a3
Aghayan, Davit
2d7a4b1a-57d9-4344-8a1a-40ab85d85276
De Meyere, Celine
549a67ce-5710-4589-b434-60dae9f55e0c
Fuks, David
8136736e-aa17-490c-8d7f-86ccd7b25906
Zimmiti, Giuseppe
98a65aa2-0fce-4ecf-a8f0-63b974ca1496
Ielpo, Benedetto
e7699c60-2945-45fb-ae80-4006b3d6c23f
Efanov, Mikhail
ceefe17f-20c9-4add-837c-0d9a3edca254
Sutcliffe, Robert P.
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Russolillo, Nadia
a793d6f6-8078-49a2-bbc5-6f101c58c4e1
Gomez-Artacho, Miquel
080e19e5-16d4-4575-9404-7088ea87f07b
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
D'Hondt, Mathieu
dad5077e-c50f-45dc-a433-f5e327566bb6
Edwin, Bjørn
b04994d3-928a-49ad-8bdf-183c7e7a08d2
Cillo, Umberto
3b5d8132-098f-4e0c-8507-51f35311d119
Rotellar, Fernando
a7de9d5e-65f1-49fa-99e9-d8ba1e46bd55
Besselink, Marc G.
45b5ed26-b8ed-4706-902f-b36907ed0994
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Lopez-Ben, Santi
1d320565-b395-4108-9044-b989bef1b420
Aldrighetti, Luca A.
a4b19d20-4a6e-4b98-9267-f76edcd689a0
Ferrero, Alessandro
0cb0b38c-30c5-44f9-996c-27e9ef37b62f
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
95c65fb5-6e7a-4592-bedd-443e96cbdaae
et al.
Bozkurt, Emre
663ca3d5-c9e6-4698-8c50-8605602d4055
Sijberden, Jasper P.
9d954519-5768-4cc9-a6c4-2cb3a051a212
Langella, Serena
7bb52936-5e41-4834-996d-9d71b5c762f7
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Collado-Roura, Francesc
1fe0ca5a-7cdf-4354-9b40-d58874ac44cd
Morrison-Jones, Victoria
42607321-18d8-4e4f-b66f-7ab3f54697b7
Görgec, Burak
57ac6eda-4ee2-474e-8369-a74ec4f6ca35
Zozaya, Gabriel
03afd1a9-3bea-4fee-b5c0-5410bc12f71c
Lanari, Jacopo
ac1a25d8-50ec-494c-a14e-47fe751da1a3
Aghayan, Davit
2d7a4b1a-57d9-4344-8a1a-40ab85d85276
De Meyere, Celine
549a67ce-5710-4589-b434-60dae9f55e0c
Fuks, David
8136736e-aa17-490c-8d7f-86ccd7b25906
Zimmiti, Giuseppe
98a65aa2-0fce-4ecf-a8f0-63b974ca1496
Ielpo, Benedetto
e7699c60-2945-45fb-ae80-4006b3d6c23f
Efanov, Mikhail
ceefe17f-20c9-4add-837c-0d9a3edca254
Sutcliffe, Robert P.
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Russolillo, Nadia
a793d6f6-8078-49a2-bbc5-6f101c58c4e1
Gomez-Artacho, Miquel
080e19e5-16d4-4575-9404-7088ea87f07b
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
D'Hondt, Mathieu
dad5077e-c50f-45dc-a433-f5e327566bb6
Edwin, Bjørn
b04994d3-928a-49ad-8bdf-183c7e7a08d2
Cillo, Umberto
3b5d8132-098f-4e0c-8507-51f35311d119
Rotellar, Fernando
a7de9d5e-65f1-49fa-99e9-d8ba1e46bd55
Besselink, Marc G.
45b5ed26-b8ed-4706-902f-b36907ed0994
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Lopez-Ben, Santi
1d320565-b395-4108-9044-b989bef1b420
Aldrighetti, Luca A.
a4b19d20-4a6e-4b98-9267-f76edcd689a0
Ferrero, Alessandro
0cb0b38c-30c5-44f9-996c-27e9ef37b62f
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
95c65fb5-6e7a-4592-bedd-443e96cbdaae

Bozkurt, Emre, Sijberden, Jasper P. and Langella, Serena , et al. (2024) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization: international multicentre study. The British journal of surgery, 111 (8), [znae181]. (doi:10.1093/bjs/znae181).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: laparoscopic liver surgery is increasingly used for more challenging procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization. 

Methods: this was an international retrospective multicentre study of patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent open or laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy after portal vein embolization between 2004 and 2020. The perioperative and oncological outcomes for patients who underwent laparoscopic and open approaches were compared using propensity score matching. 

Results: of 338 patients, 84 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure and 254 patients underwent an open procedure. Patients in the laparoscopic group less often underwent extended right hepatectomy (18% versus 34.6% (P = 0.004)), procedures in the setting of a two-stage hepatectomy (42% versus 65% (P < 0.001)), and major concurrent procedures (4% versus 16.1% (P = 0.003)). After propensity score matching, 78 patients remained in each group. The laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operating and Pringle times (330 versus 258.5 min (P < 0.001) and 65 versus 30 min (P = 0.001) respectively) and a shorter length of stay (7 versus 8 days (P = 0.011)). The R0 resection rate was not different (71% for the laparoscopic approach versus 60% for the open approach (P = 0.230)). The median disease-free survival was 12 (95% c.i. 10 to 20) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 20 (95% c.i. 13 to 31) months for the open approach (P = 0.145). The median overall survival was 28 (95% c.i. 22 to 48) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 42 (95% c.i. 35 to 52) months for the open approach (P = 0.614). 

Conclusion: the advantages of a laparoscopic over an open approach for (extended) right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization are limited.

Text
znae181 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (392kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 July 2024
Published date: 13 August 2024
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords: Aged, Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology, Embolization, Therapeutic/methods, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hepatectomy/methods, Humans, Laparoscopy/methods, Length of Stay, Liver Neoplasms/secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Portal Vein/surgery, Propensity Score, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494042
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494042
ISSN: 0007-1323
PURE UUID: b3e71b83-8d2b-4517-9f3e-09e158c069e0
ORCID for John N. Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Sep 2024 16:33
Last modified: 21 Sep 2024 01:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emre Bozkurt
Author: Jasper P. Sijberden
Author: Serena Langella
Author: Federica Cipriani
Author: Francesc Collado-Roura
Author: Victoria Morrison-Jones
Author: Burak Görgec
Author: Gabriel Zozaya
Author: Jacopo Lanari
Author: Davit Aghayan
Author: Celine De Meyere
Author: David Fuks
Author: Giuseppe Zimmiti
Author: Benedetto Ielpo
Author: Mikhail Efanov
Author: Robert P. Sutcliffe
Author: Nadia Russolillo
Author: Miquel Gomez-Artacho
Author: Francesca Ratti
Author: Mathieu D'Hondt
Author: Bjørn Edwin
Author: Umberto Cillo
Author: Fernando Rotellar
Author: Marc G. Besselink
Author: Santi Lopez-Ben
Author: Luca A. Aldrighetti
Author: Alessandro Ferrero
Author: Mohammad Abu Hilal
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×