The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

In situ synchrotron computed tomography study of nanoscale interlaminar reinforcement and thin-ply effects on damage progression in composite laminates

In situ synchrotron computed tomography study of nanoscale interlaminar reinforcement and thin-ply effects on damage progression in composite laminates
In situ synchrotron computed tomography study of nanoscale interlaminar reinforcement and thin-ply effects on damage progression in composite laminates
In situ X-ray synchrotron radiation computed tomography (SRCT) of carbon fiber composite laminates reveals the first-ever qualitative and quantitative comparisons of 3D progressive damage effects introduced by two mechanical enhancement technologies: aligned nanoscale fiber interlaminar reinforcement and thin-ply layers. The technologies were studied individually and in combination, using aerospace-grade unidirectional prepreg standard-thickness (‘std-ply’) and thin-ply composite laminates. The relatively weak interlaminar regions of the laminates were reinforced with high densities of aligned carbon nanotubes (A-CNTs) in a hierarchical architecture termed ‘nanostitching’. Quasi-isotropic double edge-notched tension (DENT) laminates were tested and simultaneously 3D-imaged via SRCT at various load steps, revealing a progressive 3D network of damage micro-mechanisms that were segmented according to modality and extent. For load steps of 0%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of baseline ultimate tensile strength (UTS), intralaminar matrix cracking and fiber/matrix interfacial debonding are found to be the dominant damage mechanisms, common to all laminate types. For both std-ply and thin-ply, nanostitched laminates had qualitatively and quantitatively similar matrix damage modality and extent compared to the baseline laminates through 90% UTS, including relatively few delaminations, despite an ~9% increase in std-ply nanostitched UTS over the std-ply baseline. Complementary finite element-based modeling of damage predicts greater delamination extent in std-ply vs. thin-ply laminates that manifests only between 90% and 100% UTS, offering an explanation for the observed positive nanostitch effect in the std-ply, which is known to be more susceptible to delamination formation and growth than the thin-ply laminates. Thin-ply, with and without nanostitch, intrinsically suppresses matrix damage, as expected from past work and evidenced here by 6.5X less overall matrix damage surface area vs. std-ply baseline laminates averaged over all load steps. These findings contribute new insights from high-resolution experimental mapping of composite damage states that can guide and inform mechanical enhancement approaches and improved damage models.
1879-1069
Ni, Xinchen
36d96458-0c72-4d23-85d9-822e4429a27c
Kopp, Reed
b5a801fe-f1e2-406c-a070-73bac41796b3
Kalfon-Cohen, Estelle
f23be8fb-88db-46e4-b258-c49fd977b87b
Furtado, Carolina
c76c5f54-d539-42f7-8d2d-55fd32ea43e7
Lee, Jeonyoon
15cdbdea-8e97-482b-b683-8e858016a5e8
Arteiro, Albertino
dcfdf34b-22d8-429d-8a17-15ee46ef7eeb
Borstnar, Gregor
4b0498bf-6b1c-4e11-bd0a-7be326e8e837
Mavrogordato, Mark N.
f3e0879b-118a-463a-a130-1c890e9ab547
Helfen, Lukas
29f093fe-3507-407b-a539-48fa3439a549
Sinclair, Ian
6005f6c1-f478-434e-a52d-d310c18ade0d
Spearing, S. Mark
9e56a7b3-e0e8-47b1-a6b4-db676ed3c17a
Camanho, Pedro P.
c96e1716-188d-43ca-b2a2-ce6b3e2d79e7
Wardle, Brian L.
a79e14c1-4da6-49fa-9eaf-d13fd4f0f85e
Ni, Xinchen
36d96458-0c72-4d23-85d9-822e4429a27c
Kopp, Reed
b5a801fe-f1e2-406c-a070-73bac41796b3
Kalfon-Cohen, Estelle
f23be8fb-88db-46e4-b258-c49fd977b87b
Furtado, Carolina
c76c5f54-d539-42f7-8d2d-55fd32ea43e7
Lee, Jeonyoon
15cdbdea-8e97-482b-b683-8e858016a5e8
Arteiro, Albertino
dcfdf34b-22d8-429d-8a17-15ee46ef7eeb
Borstnar, Gregor
4b0498bf-6b1c-4e11-bd0a-7be326e8e837
Mavrogordato, Mark N.
f3e0879b-118a-463a-a130-1c890e9ab547
Helfen, Lukas
29f093fe-3507-407b-a539-48fa3439a549
Sinclair, Ian
6005f6c1-f478-434e-a52d-d310c18ade0d
Spearing, S. Mark
9e56a7b3-e0e8-47b1-a6b4-db676ed3c17a
Camanho, Pedro P.
c96e1716-188d-43ca-b2a2-ce6b3e2d79e7
Wardle, Brian L.
a79e14c1-4da6-49fa-9eaf-d13fd4f0f85e

Ni, Xinchen, Kopp, Reed, Kalfon-Cohen, Estelle, Furtado, Carolina, Lee, Jeonyoon, Arteiro, Albertino, Borstnar, Gregor, Mavrogordato, Mark N., Helfen, Lukas, Sinclair, Ian, Spearing, S. Mark, Camanho, Pedro P. and Wardle, Brian L. (2021) In situ synchrotron computed tomography study of nanoscale interlaminar reinforcement and thin-ply effects on damage progression in composite laminates. Composites Part B: Engineering, 217, [108623]. (doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108623).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In situ X-ray synchrotron radiation computed tomography (SRCT) of carbon fiber composite laminates reveals the first-ever qualitative and quantitative comparisons of 3D progressive damage effects introduced by two mechanical enhancement technologies: aligned nanoscale fiber interlaminar reinforcement and thin-ply layers. The technologies were studied individually and in combination, using aerospace-grade unidirectional prepreg standard-thickness (‘std-ply’) and thin-ply composite laminates. The relatively weak interlaminar regions of the laminates were reinforced with high densities of aligned carbon nanotubes (A-CNTs) in a hierarchical architecture termed ‘nanostitching’. Quasi-isotropic double edge-notched tension (DENT) laminates were tested and simultaneously 3D-imaged via SRCT at various load steps, revealing a progressive 3D network of damage micro-mechanisms that were segmented according to modality and extent. For load steps of 0%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of baseline ultimate tensile strength (UTS), intralaminar matrix cracking and fiber/matrix interfacial debonding are found to be the dominant damage mechanisms, common to all laminate types. For both std-ply and thin-ply, nanostitched laminates had qualitatively and quantitatively similar matrix damage modality and extent compared to the baseline laminates through 90% UTS, including relatively few delaminations, despite an ~9% increase in std-ply nanostitched UTS over the std-ply baseline. Complementary finite element-based modeling of damage predicts greater delamination extent in std-ply vs. thin-ply laminates that manifests only between 90% and 100% UTS, offering an explanation for the observed positive nanostitch effect in the std-ply, which is known to be more susceptible to delamination formation and growth than the thin-ply laminates. Thin-ply, with and without nanostitch, intrinsically suppresses matrix damage, as expected from past work and evidenced here by 6.5X less overall matrix damage surface area vs. std-ply baseline laminates averaged over all load steps. These findings contribute new insights from high-resolution experimental mapping of composite damage states that can guide and inform mechanical enhancement approaches and improved damage models.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 January 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 January 2021
Published date: 21 April 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494058
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494058
ISSN: 1879-1069
PURE UUID: 06f6b540-b491-469e-811c-ea98013e18ab
ORCID for S. Mark Spearing: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3059-2014

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Sep 2024 17:00
Last modified: 21 Sep 2024 01:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Xinchen Ni
Author: Reed Kopp
Author: Estelle Kalfon-Cohen
Author: Carolina Furtado
Author: Jeonyoon Lee
Author: Albertino Arteiro
Author: Gregor Borstnar
Author: Lukas Helfen
Author: Ian Sinclair
Author: Pedro P. Camanho
Author: Brian L. Wardle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×