Is engaging in evidence-informed practice in education rational? What accounts for discrepancies in teachers' attitudes towards evidence use and actual instances of evidence use in schools?
Is engaging in evidence-informed practice in education rational? What accounts for discrepancies in teachers' attitudes towards evidence use and actual instances of evidence use in schools?
Whilst beneficial, the consistent and regular use of evidence to improve teaching and learning in schools is proving difficult to achieve in practice. This paper attempts to shed new light on this issue by examining the applicability of a model of rational behaviour as it relates to the notion of evidence-informed practice (EIP). Specifically, exploring the question: ‘if EIP is rational behavior, why aren't all teachers engaged in it?’, we examine whether the beliefs and perspectives of teachers in relation to EIP, align with their evidence-use behaviours. We then assess what factors (if any) prevent teachers/schools who wish to engage in EIP from doing so. To examine beliefs, instances of, and barriers to evidence use, we employ a Gradient Boosted Tree predictive model to analyse data from a survey of 696 practitioners in 79 schools. Our findings suggest that, should they wish to increase EIP within their schools, school leaders need to: 1) promote the vision for evidence-use (i.e. actively encourage its use); 2) illustrate how research and evidence can be effectively employed to enhance aspects of teaching and learning; and 3) establish effective learning environments, in which learning conversations around the use of evidence, can flourish. Simultaneously we caution that evidence use will never be fully or meaningfully realised unless school leaders prioritise EIP as a school commitment. Simultaneously, it is unlikely that such prioritisation will occur until EIP forms part of any education system's accountability regime.
accountability, evidence informed practice, evidence use, gradient boosted tree, optimal rationality
780-801
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Zhang, Dell
ae078ed1-bc72-431f-a6c9-eaaf9c73e946
1 October 2016
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Zhang, Dell
ae078ed1-bc72-431f-a6c9-eaaf9c73e946
Brown, Chris and Zhang, Dell
(2016)
Is engaging in evidence-informed practice in education rational? What accounts for discrepancies in teachers' attitudes towards evidence use and actual instances of evidence use in schools?
British Educational Research Journal, 42 (5), .
(doi:10.1002/berj.3239).
Abstract
Whilst beneficial, the consistent and regular use of evidence to improve teaching and learning in schools is proving difficult to achieve in practice. This paper attempts to shed new light on this issue by examining the applicability of a model of rational behaviour as it relates to the notion of evidence-informed practice (EIP). Specifically, exploring the question: ‘if EIP is rational behavior, why aren't all teachers engaged in it?’, we examine whether the beliefs and perspectives of teachers in relation to EIP, align with their evidence-use behaviours. We then assess what factors (if any) prevent teachers/schools who wish to engage in EIP from doing so. To examine beliefs, instances of, and barriers to evidence use, we employ a Gradient Boosted Tree predictive model to analyse data from a survey of 696 practitioners in 79 schools. Our findings suggest that, should they wish to increase EIP within their schools, school leaders need to: 1) promote the vision for evidence-use (i.e. actively encourage its use); 2) illustrate how research and evidence can be effectively employed to enhance aspects of teaching and learning; and 3) establish effective learning environments, in which learning conversations around the use of evidence, can flourish. Simultaneously we caution that evidence use will never be fully or meaningfully realised unless school leaders prioritise EIP as a school commitment. Simultaneously, it is unlikely that such prioritisation will occur until EIP forms part of any education system's accountability regime.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 October 2016
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 British Educational Research Association
Keywords:
accountability, evidence informed practice, evidence use, gradient boosted tree, optimal rationality
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494172
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494172
ISSN: 0141-1926
PURE UUID: 5104ec8c-5279-49f0-b4e0-ab91bc2b29bc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Sep 2024 16:48
Last modified: 01 Oct 2024 02:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Chris Brown
Author:
Dell Zhang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics