How judges make decisions on difficult asylum cases
How judges make decisions on difficult asylum cases
When judges assess difficult asylum cases, what guides their decision-making? Drawing on a new study, Katerina Glyniadaki shows how judges can experience a conflict between their role and their personal identity when dealing with “grey area” asylum cases.
Glyniadaki, Katerina
88fdefb3-8694-431c-98ff-e16419f19b4a
28 February 2024
Glyniadaki, Katerina
88fdefb3-8694-431c-98ff-e16419f19b4a
Katerina Glyniadaki (Author)
(2024)
How judges make decisions on difficult asylum cases
Abstract
When judges assess difficult asylum cases, what guides their decision-making? Drawing on a new study, Katerina Glyniadaki shows how judges can experience a conflict between their role and their personal identity when dealing with “grey area” asylum cases.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 28 February 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494205
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494205
PURE UUID: 342da36b-95fd-4e10-a6a9-608c4cd7878a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Sep 2024 14:39
Last modified: 15 Oct 2024 02:10
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Katerina Glyniadaki
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics