The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A word in a word: social perceptions of expletive-infixation

A word in a word: social perceptions of expletive-infixation
A word in a word: social perceptions of expletive-infixation
Despite being one of the most ‘offensive’ swearwords in the English language, fuck (and its various derivations) is also, paradoxically, one of the most frequently uttered swearwords (Beers Fägersten 2012). A possible reason for this is that fuck can express a range of different pragmatic functions (McEnery & Xiao 2004) and social meanings (see Author 1, 2022 for a review), depending on language-external factors such as speaker gender (DeFrank & Kahlbaugh, 2019). Comparatively underexplored is the role of language-internal factors in the social meanings of fuck. This chapter examines the effect of expressive morphology (Zwicky & Pullum 1987), in the form of infixation, on how fuck is socially evaluated. The research aims to inform our understanding of how the social meanings associated with particular words can depend on their form and integration with other words. The chapter details a visual matched-guise task in which 139 participants rated hypothetical speakers on scales of funny, sarcastic, happy, and rude. Results suggest that the presence and well-formedness of swearing infixation influenced responses across all scales. The chapter discusses these findings in relation to previous work linking the attribution of social meanings like funny to a word’s structural markedness (Dingemanse & Thompson 2020).
Routledge
Hunt, Matthew
bbe04f7d-80d0-4e89-ab04-56c4f8bab134
Stockall, Linnaea
ab0adfbd-e484-41d2-8475-1f21393b3cda
Sandow, Rhys
, Natalie Braber
Hunt, Matthew
bbe04f7d-80d0-4e89-ab04-56c4f8bab134
Stockall, Linnaea
ab0adfbd-e484-41d2-8475-1f21393b3cda
Sandow, Rhys
, Natalie Braber

Hunt, Matthew and Stockall, Linnaea (2024) A word in a word: social perceptions of expletive-infixation. In, Sandow, Rhys and , Natalie Braber (eds.) Sociolinguistic Approaches to Lexical Variation. Routledge. (In Press)

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Despite being one of the most ‘offensive’ swearwords in the English language, fuck (and its various derivations) is also, paradoxically, one of the most frequently uttered swearwords (Beers Fägersten 2012). A possible reason for this is that fuck can express a range of different pragmatic functions (McEnery & Xiao 2004) and social meanings (see Author 1, 2022 for a review), depending on language-external factors such as speaker gender (DeFrank & Kahlbaugh, 2019). Comparatively underexplored is the role of language-internal factors in the social meanings of fuck. This chapter examines the effect of expressive morphology (Zwicky & Pullum 1987), in the form of infixation, on how fuck is socially evaluated. The research aims to inform our understanding of how the social meanings associated with particular words can depend on their form and integration with other words. The chapter details a visual matched-guise task in which 139 participants rated hypothetical speakers on scales of funny, sarcastic, happy, and rude. Results suggest that the presence and well-formedness of swearing infixation influenced responses across all scales. The chapter discusses these findings in relation to previous work linking the attribution of social meanings like funny to a word’s structural markedness (Dingemanse & Thompson 2020).

Text
Infixing_chapter_resubmitted_draft - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 March 2026.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 September 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494225
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494225
PURE UUID: b082f474-8289-46ba-850e-e9abb399788a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Oct 2024 16:41
Last modified: 01 Oct 2024 16:41

Export record

Contributors

Author: Matthew Hunt
Author: Linnaea Stockall
Editor: Rhys Sandow
Editor: Natalie Braber

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×