A word in a word: social perceptions of expletive-infixation
A word in a word: social perceptions of expletive-infixation
Despite being one of the most ‘offensive’ swearwords in the English language, fuck (and its various derivations) is also, paradoxically, one of the most frequently uttered swearwords (Beers Fägersten 2012). A possible reason for this is that fuck can express a range of different pragmatic functions (McEnery & Xiao 2004) and social meanings (see Author 1, 2022 for a review), depending on language-external factors such as speaker gender (DeFrank & Kahlbaugh, 2019). Comparatively underexplored is the role of language-internal factors in the social meanings of fuck. This chapter examines the effect of expressive morphology (Zwicky & Pullum 1987), in the form of infixation, on how fuck is socially evaluated. The research aims to inform our understanding of how the social meanings associated with particular words can depend on their form and integration with other words. The chapter details a visual matched-guise task in which 139 participants rated hypothetical speakers on scales of funny, sarcastic, happy, and rude. Results suggest that the presence and well-formedness of swearing infixation influenced responses across all scales. The chapter discusses these findings in relation to previous work linking the attribution of social meanings like funny to a word’s structural markedness (Dingemanse & Thompson 2020).
Hunt, Matthew
bbe04f7d-80d0-4e89-ab04-56c4f8bab134
Stockall, Linnaea
ab0adfbd-e484-41d2-8475-1f21393b3cda
Hunt, Matthew
bbe04f7d-80d0-4e89-ab04-56c4f8bab134
Stockall, Linnaea
ab0adfbd-e484-41d2-8475-1f21393b3cda
Hunt, Matthew and Stockall, Linnaea
(2024)
A word in a word: social perceptions of expletive-infixation.
In,
Sandow, Rhys and , Natalie Braber
(eds.)
Sociolinguistic Approaches to Lexical Variation.
Routledge.
(In Press)
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
Despite being one of the most ‘offensive’ swearwords in the English language, fuck (and its various derivations) is also, paradoxically, one of the most frequently uttered swearwords (Beers Fägersten 2012). A possible reason for this is that fuck can express a range of different pragmatic functions (McEnery & Xiao 2004) and social meanings (see Author 1, 2022 for a review), depending on language-external factors such as speaker gender (DeFrank & Kahlbaugh, 2019). Comparatively underexplored is the role of language-internal factors in the social meanings of fuck. This chapter examines the effect of expressive morphology (Zwicky & Pullum 1987), in the form of infixation, on how fuck is socially evaluated. The research aims to inform our understanding of how the social meanings associated with particular words can depend on their form and integration with other words. The chapter details a visual matched-guise task in which 139 participants rated hypothetical speakers on scales of funny, sarcastic, happy, and rude. Results suggest that the presence and well-formedness of swearing infixation influenced responses across all scales. The chapter discusses these findings in relation to previous work linking the attribution of social meanings like funny to a word’s structural markedness (Dingemanse & Thompson 2020).
Text
Infixing_chapter_resubmitted_draft
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 March 2026.
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 September 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494225
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494225
PURE UUID: b082f474-8289-46ba-850e-e9abb399788a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Oct 2024 16:41
Last modified: 01 Oct 2024 16:41
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Matthew Hunt
Author:
Linnaea Stockall
Editor:
Rhys Sandow
Editor:
Natalie Braber
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics